It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Its not going to be the end of the world fact. Yes you could very well get a nasty outbreak but Its not going to turn in to a world ending pandemic like the doom porners on here predict.
intrptr
I don't know where you are getting this information from but it is inaccurate and misleading
intrptr
.Please do some research on this subject before you post.
Ebola is a nasty virus but unlikely to cause the next global pandemic to kill millions.
intrptr
Surely a contender. Anything capable of airborne transmission is. It keeps rearing its ugly head in micro breaks, too.
ketsuko
Sorry, my husband has been a professional microbiologist working in pharma with things that can kill for over a decade, and his experiences agrees with ewok's.
ketsuko
Ebola is not airborn and kills too quickly to become a global pandemic threat. It would need to mutate from its present state in order become that kind of killer. It would either need to slow down its virulence so that victims would have more time to walk around and infect people before becoming incapacitated or it would need to become airborn or both or perhaps mutate to become passed through a vector like a mosquito or flea.
Perhaps you are thinking of other hemorrhagic fevers? Ebola isn't the only one.
And yet it always seems to be contained.
Sorry, my husband has been a professional microbiologist working in pharma with things that can kill for over a decade, and his experiences agrees with wok's.
Ebola is not airborne and kills too quickly to become a global pandemic threat.
If a Pandemic that's going to kill millions is going to emerge it will be on the line of SARS, Influenza or another HIV like virus.
Foo_Lovers
Not sure if it's been mentioned yet but there has been a case today found in Cananda it was from a person who has flown in from the effected area. They have been put into isolation. And officials said that at the time the person was on the plane they would not have been infectious. Will look for a link but this was reported on sky ( I think ) www.bbc.co.uk...edit on 25-3-2014 by Foo_Lovers because: (no reason given)
Foo_Lovers
Not sure if it's been mentioned yet but there has been a case today found in Cananda it was from a person who has flown in from the effected area. They have been put into isolation. And officials said that at the time the person was on the plane they would not have been infectious. Will look for a link but this was reported on sky ( I think ) www.bbc.co.uk...edit on 25-3-2014 by Foo_Lovers because: (no reason given)
texasgirl
[
The officials in Conakry say it's not Ebola. If it's not then what is it? Does it mean it could be airborne? That's a little concerning.
intrptr
Pleas inform me if newer methods are utilized to decrease the time it takes to identify which virus they are dealing with?
texasgirl
reply to post by crazyewok
I was hoping no one would say Marburg. That scares me. It was highly contagious and airborne.
Canada is too close for comfort.