It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MotherMayEye
Couple this theory with today's news that the Royal Thai Air Force saw the plane on radar in the Maldives...
Pakd-on-mystery
reply to post by xmaddness
Best explanation I've heard upto date...
however, Maledives-island residents claim to have seen a white jumbo jet flying from north to south-east, which is the opposite direction of Langkawi airport.
source:Maledives residents report sighting of 'low flying jet'edit on 18/3/2014 by Pakd-on-mystery because: source
SandGod
reply to post by xmaddness
Holy crap. Someone on ATS just posted a "simplest explanation". Hell doth froze ovah....
AugustusMasonicus
MotherMayEye
Couple this theory with today's news that the Royal Thai Air Force saw the plane on radar in the Maldives...
Post a link that the Thai military saw the aircraft in the Maldives. Being that the Maldives are over 1,500 miles from Thailand I would suspect this is inaccurate.
But Goodfellow's theory has been disputed. If the course was changed during a major emergency, one might expect it to be done using manual control. But the left turn was the result of someone in the cockpit typing "seven or eight keystrokes into a computer on a knee-high pedestal between the captain and the first officer, according to officials"
ilikeboringthings
Noticed a rebuttal of Chris Goodfellow's theory on BBC news (apologies if this argument has already been mentioned).
But Goodfellow's theory has been disputed. If the course was changed during a major emergency, one might expect it to be done using manual control. But the left turn was the result of someone in the cockpit typing "seven or eight keystrokes into a computer on a knee-high pedestal between the captain and the first officer, according to officials"
Theory 5 - Missing Malaysia plane: 10 theories examined www.bbc.co.uk...
Libertygal
So, can you couple this theory with the allegations made that the co-pilot, and not the pilot, after, I think it was stated, radioed in, "All right, goodnight all."
www.telegraph.co.uk...
They did firmly state this was the co-pilot, and not the pilot.
It was stated that he gave no indication of a problem. Would this be considered then, a clue as in, I am pretending there is no trouble, but you know there is, I know there is, hence, this is a veiled signal?
edit on 18-3-2014 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)