It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
'
WordsAreAvenues
My question in all of this is why disappear a whole plane full of passengers instead of dealing with these few employees in a more discrete manner?
Stealthbomber
reply to post by fullofmoxie
If a transponder malfunctions it can cause problems for ATC by sort of acting like a jammer and therefore would need to be turned off, and also planes turn off their transponders when they're on the ground as 100 planes on the ground all squawking would cause massive radio frequency noise.
Stealthbomber
reply to post by fullofmoxie
It's as simple as turning a knob to standby mode, that'll make it stop transmitting it's flight ID and altitude.
This doesn't turn the plane into a stealth jet or anything radar can still track it assuming your in radar range.
Stealthbomber
reply to post by jazz10
The pilots would notice if the plane was going off course, so for them to have let that happen then they'd have to be in on it but that just makes flying it remotely (even though you can't) stupid because why not just get the pilots to fly it if they're in on it.
Stealthbomber
reply to post by fullofmoxie
Sure they could do your paper cup thing but then whose going to turn it on if the cockpits been compromised, they wouldn't exactly be able to go and leave to get a cup?
Phage
reply to post by learnatic
So the answer would be no.
Radio jamming is not the same as remote control and, in fact, one might tend to exclude the other.
edit on 3/16/2014 by Phage because: (no reason given)