The Answer

reply to post by Krahzeef_Ukhar


This sounds like confusion, no offence.
I agree we know sh!t, but I disagree that Sh1t can be quantified by another.

UltraverseMaximus
reply to post by Krahzeef_Ukhar

 

This sounds like confusion, no offence.
I agree we know sh!t, but I disagree that Sh1t can be quantified by another.

I'm pretty hard to offend don't worry.

I'm not trying to quantify, if anything it is showing that those who do are full of S....unshine.

Not confusion. I believe confusion is a handful of answers and not knowing which is the right one.
What I'm saying is accepting that they are all likely wrong.

Ignorance is a good thing and it's the only way to be sure you are right.

reply to post by UltraverseMaximus


Fair enough. Keep up the good search and hey if you decide to make a thread, maybe I'll stop by.

Itisnowagain

UltraverseMaximus

Itisnowagain
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

Life is not the only important thing in existence - life is existence. Life is not 'in' existence.
Existence IS life.
Aliveness IS.

Whatever Rene

We could play semantics until the cows come home but what is the point. Are you even going somewhere with this?

##SNIPPED##

"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet".

A rose by any other name to me means this. Rosicrucians pretend to be the rose when they are the thorn.
Pretend to be the scent when they are the sting, shall I continue?
Yes name changed, ATS couldn't handle that someone could actually be named that I guess.

Krahzeef_Ukhar

UltraverseMaximus
reply to post by Krahzeef_Ukhar

 

This sounds like confusion, no offence.
I agree we know sh!t, but I disagree that Sh1t can be quantified by another.

I'm pretty hard to offend don't worry.

I'm not trying to quantify, if anything it is showing that those who do are full of S....unshine.

Not confusion. I believe confusion is a handful of answers and not knowing which is the right one.
What I'm saying is accepting that they are all likely wrong.

Ignorance is a good thing and it's the only way to be sure you are right.

There does come a point when indecision can be leveraged, confusion becomes someone else's window and ignorance is no longer blissful. When the veil is removed it is very depressing interacting with organic robots who quite literally just obey and react.

Krahzeef_Ukhar
The only thing we can be sure of is our own existence.

There is nothing seeing existence.

That which does not appear to exist is what is real.

Regardless of the world we believe we live in, we will only ever be sure of a tiny percentage.

The world is nothing but a bunch of ideas.

It is 'that' which the ideas form out of and fall back into which is real.

The formless is forming all that is.

UltraverseMaximus
There does come a point when indecision can be leveraged, confusion becomes someone else's window and ignorance is no longer blissful. When the veil is removed it is very depressing interacting with organic robots who quite literally just obey and react.

I've gotta say I don't know what that means. I'll try and please correct me.

I am not pushing indecision. Like confusion it implies that there is a correct answer.
Nor am I saying ignorance is bliss.
Obeying and reacting? My completely unworthy assessment believes that people do obey and react. And that at the very least my answer will allow those that do to question their servtitude and reactions.

I look forward to hearing how I misinterpreted that.

Itisnowagain

Krahzeef_Ukhar
The only thing we can be sure of is our own existence.

There is nothing seeing existence.

That which does not appear to exist is what is real.

Regardless of the world we believe we live in, we will only ever be sure of a tiny percentage.

The world is nothing but a bunch of ideas.

It is 'that' which the ideas form out of and fall back into which is real.

The formless is forming all that is.

edit on 14-3-2014 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)

I don't want to add to the "off topic" mystery posts but could you be more legible?

As a drunkard myself I can understand but could you try again?

reply to post by Krahzeef_Ukhar


'That' which is seeing 'that which is appearing as existence' cannot be seen.
'That' which is real does not appear to exist.

Can you see what is seeing?

Seek that which is seeing.

Can the dreamer of the dream ever be seen? Or is it just the dream scene that is seen?

Without the dreamer (which never makes an appearance) can the dream be?

Life is but a dream - existence is dream stuff.

Removed post

Itisnowagain
reply to post by Krahzeef_Ukhar

 

'That' which is seeing 'that which is appearing as existence' cannot be seen.
'That' which is real does not appear to exist.

Can you see what is seeing?

Seek that which is seeing.

Can the dreamer of the dream ever be seen? Or is it just the dream scene that is seen?

edit on 14-3-2014 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)

'That' which is seeing 'that which is appearing as existence' cannot be seen.?

That is all that can be seen.

We may never know if the dream is really seen. Or if we seem to believe the scene we have seen.
Before I start channeling Dr Seuss I should probably stop.

Before the scene that I seen effects my poor spleen.

maybe it isn't the answer you have to worry about
its the question

reply to post by Krahzeef_Ukhar


There appears to be colour and sound and then a thought appears that says I see I hear.
Is there a 'who'??
'Who' could possibly know?

Krahzeef_Ukhar
Therefore the safest belief is to believe that nothing is absolutely true or false.

I cast my vote for that text above.

Danbones
maybe it isn't the answer you have to worry about
its the question

Most questions are loaded.

By not clarifying the question I believe you get a more honest answer.

And as far as I can tell so far, the answer is correct.