It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
marg6043
reply to post by ~Lucidity
I believe it changed when most manufacturing left the state, in the last 15 years, now they are working on legislation to legalize medicinal marijuana to bring more income, If this is approved I imagine that it will open the door for more.
www.wsbtv.com...
TownCryer
reply to post by TrueAmerican
[m
Federal laws trump state laws. This is likely just a puplicity stunt for GOPers to raise more donations. Money grab - won't change anything. The harder these states that don't like Obama try to squeeze out the Federal government, the faster they bring about the very changes they're trying to avoid.
buster2010
Georgia reminds me of the girl suing her parents for college funds and living expenses. We want to do as we please but keep paying our bills for us. If Georgia really wanted to lead other states then make an example and pay your own way instead of begging the government for so much aid. They are part of the reason why we have so much debt because the government has to take care of their people instead of Georgia taking care of them themselves. So until they so this anything they pass against the governments spending is just a joke.
bbracken677
buster2010
Georgia reminds me of the girl suing her parents for college funds and living expenses. We want to do as we please but keep paying our bills for us. If Georgia really wanted to lead other states then make an example and pay your own way instead of begging the government for so much aid. They are part of the reason why we have so much debt because the government has to take care of their people instead of Georgia taking care of them themselves. So until they so this anything they pass against the governments spending is just a joke.
The situation you describe is easily the situation the federal govt likes. Dependent states, dependent populace...less likely to revolt, no?
Does not prevent a revolt though, just less likely.
bbracken677
The situation you describe is easily the situation the federal govt likes. Dependent states, dependent populace...less likely to revolt, no?
Does not prevent a revolt though, just less likely.
buster2010
marg6043
reply to post by buster2010
I tell you what, we could do better if all the manufacturing jobs were still here, but since I became a resident of the state of GA, back in 96 in my small town alone we have lost 8 big manufacturing businesses, to name a few or the big names, Merck, Cooper tires, Bob candy, one side of Proctor and Gamble, uniforms, ect.
Now you tell me what we have done wrong that these businesses feel that moving to Mexico and China is better than keeping jobs in the state, and this is just in my small town, the town went from manufactures to welfare recipients.
Do not blame the states, most welfare states now are the product of bad businesses in Washington policies that benefits the pockets of politicians while screwing the working class in the states.
When Washington benefactors benefits from tax payer dollars the states suffer.
Did the government move these jobs overseas? No they didn't blame the people that own the companies for doing that. You can't say taxes were the cause because taxes are lower now than ever so it was nothing more than greed that caused these companies to move.
Gryphon66
Some of you buy into this "smaller government" sloganeering so completely, and yet, you don't even think for a moment what it would be like to live in a world without the unified force that is the US. Do you think that Tennessee or Oregon would have been able to stand up to Hitler or Stalin or Mao?
edit on 0Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:04:09 -050014p122014366 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)