Beijing-bound MAS plane carrying 239 people missing as of 20 mins ago.

some guy on twitter reported he tagged 11 back packs???

One of the crowd source draw backs...

The res is 1 pixel = 1/2 meter. I would think a back pack is one pixel.

reply to post by xavi1000


Sorry, thought it might have been, have only just got back in for the day and yowsers how many posts are we on now?!

The site isn't lagging or freezing for me, can't see anything suspect on the images, then again my eyesight isn't the best

reply to post by civpop


bottom pic: "uruskan beg mayat sejumlah" is I think "need a number of body bags"?

TLDM is the royal malaysian navy

reply to post by civpop


I guess the person above answered... TDLM is the Royal Malaysian Navy

The language is malay..

I tried that site the other day and all I got was blank squares then some random squares had a smaller square of cloud or sea, today it's not loading.

reply to post by inshel


Oh dear don't know where it has come from just saw it and posted it.

TOMNOD is working right now! Or at least for me.

Searching...

NeoSpace
[email protected] was the email, may be deleted for using profanities but it looks like this

F##k you oc tower

and the passport number does not look right 888818

edit on 12-3-2014 by NeoSpace because: (no reason given)

That alias does look suspicious. I would assume Google looked into the account to see if it is new and probably some sick internet warrior's work.

Bilk22

Leonidas

Bilk22

research100
reply to post by Bilk22

 

on the 11pm news right now..newscaster says the families are calling and the phones are still ringing...still talking about the pilot having pretty ladies in the cockpit on an earlier flight....that's all they said

Yeah I don't think this wreck will be found until things cool off and it's almost forgotten. Then they can put a junker out there somewhere and claim it was this flight. Well that is if it's even necessary at that point. We all might be preoccupied with something else a bit more troubling by then. But if anyone finds it now, it will be the Chinese.

That is ridiculous to think a "junker" would fool anyone, no matter when it is found.

And do you get 60 hours of battery life with your cellphone? Do you know anyone that does?

International roaming often leads to a phone ringing even when the phone is off or not in range of service.

You cannot fool air investigators with any-old-airframe to be a B-777.

Are you speculating, or stating fact? Please make that clear.

I'm saying someone will take a picture of a plane coming out of the water and then they'll lie thru their teeth to us. Is that plain and simple enough?

Airliners and their engines are made of parts that have serial numbers all over them that cannot reasonably be counterfeited.

A phantom Jet lurking in the water is not going to fool anyone. It will have to be a B777. Then the serial numbers will prove which specific 777 it is, without doubt whether that jet is intact or in parts.

reply to post by civpop


It looks like they are thinking they found something... don't know why its on twitter by individuals before its anywhere else though... we might wait for some official word as twitter has a lot of falsehood going on surrounding this.

Libertygal
reply to post by DrHammondStoat

 

My question is who would that benefit? In this day and age of manipulating false flags, why would an Iranian terrorist link be hushed up if there was one? Wouldn't it be more probable that it would be used in the MSM as more propaganda?

Thanks for asking, and I will do my best to answer.

..........
The terrorism front has not just been downplayed in the US, but other countries are following our lead. The mental health aspect has been a broadbased discussion across many countries.

An article was even linked, just recently, above this response. When I read that article, which I admittedly browsed, I got to one point where it was even stated that if it was deemed to be terrorism, some of the insurance wouldn't get paid. Thereby, they have even more motivation to change the optics to the mental illness vision. I will link the article and quote pertinent sections.

With the Fort Hood incident, it was the opposite. The government would have been held more responsible, and the payouts would have been higher for the victims' families. This was the reason for the outrage after the attack.

There are multiple reasons to downplay the terrorism aspect, and draw attention to the mental health aspect.

Also, please note that sheer accidental death is the *last* thing on the list, because this would denote at least some extent on someones' behalf, of negilgence. Either in repairs and upkeep, or some failure of a responsible party to do something, and failed to do it.

Mental illness leaves everyone free of responsibility, how could we know? He seemed so normal! He was such a nice guy, we never saw this coming! It's the easiest, cleanest, and least costly way for all involved. Best of all, the pilot is no longer here to defend himself.

Hoping this makes sense. Now for that article:

www.ecns.cn...

Further compensation from Malaysia
Airlines depends on the reason for the
accident. If it is established that the disaster
resulted from a mistake by the airline, the
compensation could be huge, said Hao.

"If it turns out to be a terrorist attack, some
travel insurance policies may not apply. But
the families of those who purchased life or
accident policies would get compensation
under any circumstances," Hao said.

edit on 12-3-2014 by Libertygal because: (no reason given)

I understand your theory thanks, it's interesting.

At this stage with no wreckage, no credible terrorist organisations claiming responsibility and all the confusion over the last sightings of the plane, I'm not convinced it was terrorism, obviously this would change if the evidence comes out. Also the families of the victims getting payouts won't be relevant in supporting your theory because they can't in any way influence who is held responsible for this tragedy. I would have thought the airline would still be sued if the pilot was mentally unstable as it would be their responsibility to monitor their pilots?
I can imagine that the authorities may want to minimise their responsibilities in either an accident or terrorist incident though.

reply to post by OpinionatedB


If his screen name is any hint...psycho_path...

Cosmocow
reply to post by OpinionatedB

 

If his screen name is any hint...psycho_path...

Lol that's why I put crackpot?

reply to post by civpop


Oh I know... Just wanted to state it in case others weren't noticing. This guy is a scam...

reply to post by Cosmocow


It seems they had the idea from a recorded conversation? Does the Royal Navy in Malaysia record themselves often?

Doesn't sound right...

Your right, the screen name doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

reply to post by xavi1000

Very interesting letter you posted there.

1. Someone must have seen something somewhere.

2. I really wish they hadn't allowed that guys name and passport number to be transmitted across the world on that letter. That can't be good.

reply to post by Libertygal


I've been a lurker here for 6 years and I've never felt more compelled to sign up to tell someone that they have such an unhealthy obsession and self-aggrandment via the use of the word "OPTICS"

reply to post by MRuss


I believe news media have now called that false.

Cosmocow
reply to post by civpop

 

Oh I know... Just wanted to state it in case others weren't noticing. This guy is a scam...

well at least he went out of his way a bit to be a psychopath. if you want to find him on twitter you have to add in a couple extra underscores

Got to get to sleep now it's late here, I really hope for the families sake, we wake to some news on what has happened, they need some sort of closure and answers whatever that may be.

Night all.