It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
vivid1975
In a court of law, people have been tried and killed through the testimony of multiple witnesses alone. Here we have testimony of a pilot in close proximity for 15 minutes, sunbathers at a local beach and a control tower. You also have written evidence in the communication with the military that will have to have been documented. This is all "evidence".
The transparency of the Dairylea Debunkers is sooooo obvious its laughable. (Can I ask all members to make a log of all the debunkers that despite testimony. .totally bypass the facts such as an object moving at mach 10 and comparing it with a hot air balloon. .or *facepalms* ..a mountain. This way we can mount a case to eradicate these paid idiots to have a sensible discussion. This however doesn't mean anyone who simply disagrees..just the blatant regular debunkers with zero intelligence).
Great find OP. I hadn't seen this case before thank you!
vivid1975
It is evident to me that once you acknowledge the 300,000 reported UFO sightings per year (not counting all the unreported ones) and testimonials from Astronauts and Canadian Mod, and high ranking military personnel and pilots etc. You can finally say, yes Extraterrestrials exist..and they are here.
Aliensun
reply to post by AliceBleachWhite
Jim? Are you there? Anyway, you sound like Oberg in that whatever it was, it couldn't have been a UFO because they don't exist.
So the experienced pilot was absolutely totally wrong in what he saw at close quarters and flew around, he didn't see anything startling that happened with the object and then the thing couldn't have vanished from his view in a blink because it was a balloon....and, and, oh, yeah, the three experienced witnesses on the ground that probably knew that it was a balloon and were going along with the pilot just to get themselves into the newspapers. Solved. Case closed.
Westendorff approached the ship, and during the second lap around it, used the radio from the cockpit to inform the control room of the Brazilian Company of Airport Infrastructure (Infraero) of Pelotas airport on what was happening. Asked the operator Infraero Airton Mendes da Silva, 40, what he saw in the east sector toward the runway 15/33. "I looked out and saw an object on the horizon, in the form of a gray triangle with rounded edges," says the operator. In 11 years of working at the airport, Silva ensures never having seen anything like it. With him were the auxiliary port services Gilberto Martins dos Santos, 50 years old and 14 on-site service, and Jorge Renato S. Dutra, 31 years old and ten service, together they tried to identify the flying object. "He looked to the naked eye, the size of a high-voltage tower, compare Gilberto.'s Biggest surprise, however, came when they saw the ship moving in the vertical direction. Unaware aircraft on Earth that moves vertically as moved the object before disappearing into the clouds, "attests Airton. "I'd never seen a monster that size flying," says Jorge.
www.prufon.net...
The Ministry of Aviation maintains an undercover investigation on the ship sighted by Westendorff. A sergeant of the Canoas Air Force Base traveled to Pelotas to collect the testimony of the businessman and of the Infraero officials. The sergeant asked for anonymity, but spent an afternoon at the airfield where he heard the eyewitness accounts and took knowledge of the episode.
kingofthecouch
Maybe this has been mentioned already, but does anyone else notice the similarity between the drawings and the old NASA return capsules?