It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The pro-Russian activists occupied the Donbas railway junction of regional importance - Debaltseve city. This is reported by Ukrainian news agency.
After Debaltseve are most potyahivpivdenno-east. Also in the city - the two largest thermal power plant - Vuglegirska and Myronivska.
According to reports, armed men seized the city council.
KIEV, Ukraine — The last time Oleg Tyagnibok was a member of Ukraine’s Parliament, his colleagues kicked him out over a fiery speech in which he described how Ukrainians, during World War II, bravely fought Muscovites, Germans, Jews “and other scum,” and then used slurs to refer to the “Jewish-Russian mafia, which rules in Ukraine.”
Eight years later, Mr. Tyagnibok is preparing to return to Parliament, not as a lone member of a broader coalition, as he was when he was ejected, but as the leader of Svoboda, the ultranationalist, right-wing party that will control 38 of 450 seats, or about 8.5 percent of the national legislature.
Svoboda’s surprising show of strength in the Oct. 29 election — polls had predicted that the party would fail to meet the 5 percent threshold to enter Parliament — has stirred alarm, including warnings from Israel about the rise of anti-Semitism and xenophobia in Ukraine, a former Soviet republic and a place with a firsthand knowledge of ethnic violence and genocide.
But in an interview in the downtown office building that Svoboda shares with an insurance company and a dental clinic named Smile, Mr. Tyagnibok said that fear of his party was misplaced and the accusations of racism and extremism unfounded.
“Svoboda is not an anti-Semitic party,” he said, seated behind a desk, a sport jacket stretched by his barrel-sized chest, his huge hands folded in front of him, speaking slowly and firmly in Ukrainian. “Svoboda is not a xenophobic party. Svoboda is not an anti-Russian party. Svoboda is not an anti-European party. Svoboda is simply and only a pro-Ukrainian party. And that’s it.”
Of course, that was not it.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Agent_USA_Supporter
a reply to: dragonridr
NATO has being claiming that Russia would attack Europe since the end of 1949 and the end of World War yet whenever NATO Expands further on Russia's soil thats fine right?
Again false narative Russia was taken off NATOs agenda in fact they were a partner until recently they were allowed to even participate in NATO activities. Again you appear to be attempting to re write history. You do know that Russia had offices in NATO until ther were expelled over Ukraine dont you?
originally posted by: SurrenderingAmerica
***Flashback Tuesday***
Ukraine’s Ultranationalists Show Surprising Strength at Polls
KIEV, Ukraine — The last time Oleg Tyagnibok was a member of Ukraine’s Parliament, his colleagues kicked him out over a fiery speech in which he described how Ukrainians, during World War II, bravely fought Muscovites, Germans, Jews “and other scum,” and then used slurs to refer to the “Jewish-Russian mafia, which rules in Ukraine.”
Eight years later, Mr. Tyagnibok is preparing to return to Parliament, not as a lone member of a broader coalition, as he was when he was ejected, but as the leader of Svoboda, the ultranationalist, right-wing party that will control 38 of 450 seats, or about 8.5 percent of the national legislature.
Svoboda’s surprising show of strength in the Oct. 29 election — polls had predicted that the party would fail to meet the 5 percent threshold to enter Parliament — has stirred alarm, including warnings from Israel about the rise of anti-Semitism and xenophobia in Ukraine, a former Soviet republic and a place with a firsthand knowledge of ethnic violence and genocide.
But in an interview in the downtown office building that Svoboda shares with an insurance company and a dental clinic named Smile, Mr. Tyagnibok said that fear of his party was misplaced and the accusations of racism and extremism unfounded.
“Svoboda is not an anti-Semitic party,” he said, seated behind a desk, a sport jacket stretched by his barrel-sized chest, his huge hands folded in front of him, speaking slowly and firmly in Ukrainian. “Svoboda is not a xenophobic party. Svoboda is not an anti-Russian party. Svoboda is not an anti-European party. Svoboda is simply and only a pro-Ukrainian party. And that’s it.”
Of course, that was not it.
click link for rest of article.
The Russian Defense Ministry is planning to deploy additional forces in Crimea as part of beefing up the Black Sea fleet under a $2.5 billion program. The need for new deployment emerged after the formerly Ukrainian peninsula joined Russia.
Based on the results of yesterday's fighting under Slavic, were killed 5 pro fighters , two of whom were commanders of groups. 13 separatists were injured. It was in his Twitter told reporters the Russian newspaper " Komsomolskaya Pravda " Alexander Kotz , citing Russian saboteur Hirkina ( call - Stryelok ).
' Strelkov just us, my losses yesterday - five killed , 13 wounded. My 800 was not there , only about 50. Of the five victims - two commanders of groups, some of the most experienced and battle '- written by a journalist.
Kotz is with the separatists , known as ' militias ' , and the actions of the Ukrainian army , using the terminology of the Russian government , says ' punitive action ', as is evident from the titration video.
originally posted by: Matt1951
And Asen is still missing in action.
Pierre Crom @PierreCrom
Shooting in center #sloviansk Street empty in seconds #ukraine
C.J. Chivers @cjchivers
Gunfire in center of Slovyansk, near SBU building. People fleeing. #ukraine
Really a partner ? Why weren't they allowed to participate in they Defense Shield then ? Oh that's right it was put there to threaten their Russian Partners. With friends like that who needs enemies.
The Russian Foreign Ministry has continually insisted on legally binding guarantees that US missile defenses are not aimed at it and that would allow Russia access to sensitive aspects of the system. Russia has also threatened to deploy a range of countermeasures against NATO’s missile defenses, including tactical nuclear missile deployment in Kaliningrad and improvements to its strategic nuclear missile arsenal to make it capable of evading missile defense. Whether EPAA is aimed at Russia or technically capable of even potentially intercepting Russian missiles, however, are very different considerations. But the Russians seem to ignore that simple truth that the technology is limited by physics and engineering, not political considerations.
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: 13th Zodiac
Really a partner ? Why weren't they allowed to participate in they Defense Shield then ? Oh that's right it was put there to threaten their Russian Partners. With friends like that who needs enemies.
Actually it wasn't...
The Russian Foreign Ministry has continually insisted on legally binding guarantees that US missile defenses are not aimed at it and that would allow Russia access to sensitive aspects of the system. Russia has also threatened to deploy a range of countermeasures against NATO’s missile defenses, including tactical nuclear missile deployment in Kaliningrad and improvements to its strategic nuclear missile arsenal to make it capable of evading missile defense. Whether EPAA is aimed at Russia or technically capable of even potentially intercepting Russian missiles, however, are very different considerations. But the Russians seem to ignore that simple truth that the technology is limited by physics and engineering, not political considerations.
breakingdefense.com...
But hey what does the truth matter when it comes to Russia as they are the ones everybody picks on.
Order disbanding hundred head Self gave Maidana Andrew Paruby . Anyone who wants to defend the country , go to the army or Natsgvardiyu .
Self Maidana reformat battalions , said the commander of the newly created territorial defense battalion of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Taras bearded .
According to the military , after activists Self will act in the ranks of the National Guard, the special units of the MIA and military battalions of the Territorial Defence . Also create reserve units , which would be coordinated Self staffs in each regional center and will be united by a single central headquarters.
" In the context of military aggression , such structures as " hundreds "are no longer operational. We quantity, staffing no longer coincides with the military structures , very difficult for us to join them . Therefore, it is now very important. Indeed , when we have infuse , have to reformat them , "- explained Bearded changes in self-defense.
The ranks of the new units will only accept those who are in one time or another been in the ranks of self-defense, explained the military. The main tasks of associations - the protection of the territorial integrity and independence of Ukraine .
Also military said in Odessa regional administration building local guards battalion " Kyiv -1" , where activists are just self-defense.
Reformatting the last 10 days. According to the orders of the head of Andrei Self Parubiya , all who do not comply will not be more irrelevant to self-defense.
Bearded man said that during the revolution were barricades on the Maidan . " Now our barricades in the east. We stand on the barricades . Our guys in the Armed Forces , National Guard battalion . Stand today on the barricades where necessary to protect Ukraine. Those nudyatsya here on the Maidan, it would be better not shout ," Give us arms we will go to war . " When they found a mechanism how to give weapons wishing appears every day less. they feel comfortable to live here on the barricades in the rear ," - he said.
On the Independence will maydanovtsev formed from the 11th Battalion of the territorial defense of Kiev . Homebase is Ukrainian House .
Putin Accidentally Posts Real Crimean Election Results; Only 15% Voted For Annexation
Comment Now Follow Comments
The website of the “President of Russia’s Council on Civil Society and Human Rights” posted a blog that was quickly taken down as if it were toxic radioactive waste. According to the Council’s report about the March referendum to annex Crimea, the turnout was a maximum 30%. And of these, only half voted for annexation – meaning only 15 percent of Crimean citizens voted for annexation.
The fate of Crimea, therefore, was decided by the 15 percent of Crimeans, who voted in favor of unification with Russia (under the watchful eye of Kalashnikov-toting soldiers).
The official Crimean election results, as reported widely in the Western press, showed a 97 percent vote in favor of annexation with a turnout of 83 percent. No international observers were allowed. This pro-Russia election pressure would have raised the already weak vote in favor of annexation.
To make sure no one misses this:
Official Kremlin results: 97% for annexation, turnout 83 percent, and percent of Crimeans voting in favor 82%.
President’s Human Rights Council results: 50% for annexation, turnout 30%, percent of Crimeans voting in favor 15%.
How Putin Is Reinventing Warfare
Posted by BMT Editor in Russia
The Kremlin, according to Barack Obama, is stuck in the "old ways," trapped in Cold War or even 19th century mindsets. But look closer at the Kremlin's actions during the crisis in Ukraine and you begin to see a very 21st century mentality, manipulating transnational financial interconnections, spinning global media, and reconfiguring geo-political alliances. Could it be that the West is the one caught up in the "old ways," while the Kremlin is the geopolitical avant-garde, informed by a dark, subversive reading of globalization?