It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MessageforAll
reply to post by DJW001
Interesting, why do you think that? Sincere question.
MessageforAll
reply to post by DJW001
I see, that's a possibility I guess, don't you think the Top brass of Russia wants to restore the old USSR?
MysterX
You think it's a coincidence that Ukraine is suddenly in turmoil as soon as the EU is told to take a hike and the deal is off with Ukraine joining the EU, but you somehow think this is a Russian land grab?
That's ridiculous.
Putin knows that America is weak. Syria showed him that the Obama administration was going to do nothing militarily. It emboldened him, to do whatever he wanted to do with the Ukraine. End of story.
TrueBrit
reply to post by MessageforAll
It is not just the simple fact that they put boots on the ground, but the fact that the troops they sent were not wearing their national colours, which is a VERY shady way to work no matter which way you slice it.
Personally, I do not think it would be nearly as bad if the Russians had shown that they were serious enough to actually put their flag on this cluster copulation.
andy1972
MysterX
You think it's a coincidence that Ukraine is suddenly in turmoil as soon as the EU is told to take a hike and the deal is off with Ukraine joining the EU, but you somehow think this is a Russian land grab?
That's ridiculous.
Im not the only one thinking it's strange that after they accept a 15 billion bailout from the Russians and give the EU and NATO the finger, three weeks later all hell breaks loose and the pro Russian government is ousted..ummm, strange.
edit on AM6Sat20141972 by andy1972 because: (no reason given)
All the dominoes are tumbling now. Moments after the Russian upper house of parliament approved the decision to use Russian troops in the Ukraine as expected, Ukraine's acting president called an emergency meeting of security chiefs according to his spokeswoman. Oleksander Turchinov summoned his Security Council after Russian President Vladimir Putin sought parliamentary approval to deploy Russian forces in the Ukrainian region of Crimea. At this point the biggest and perhaps final wildcard is whether NATO does or does not get involved. If it does, and if Russia does not back off - which it has clearly telegraphed it won't - futures may be looking at a limit down open on Sunday.
andy1972
Asking for boots on the ground and actually INVADING, to stabilise the situacion are two different things.
He' asking for the power to do it..
deviant300
US President Barack Obama has warned Russia there will be "costs" for any military intervention in Ukraine.
The takeover of power in Kiev by the mainstream opposition is a coup that has been executed by force, which overlooks the opinions of at least half of the Ukrainian population. Yet, you would not know this from listening to such media outlets and networks as CNN or Fox News or reading the headlines being produced by Reuters and the state-owned British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). The events in Kiev are misleadingly being billed and framed by these media sources and the so-called “Western” governments they support, either directly or indirectly, as the triumph of people power and democracy in Ukraine.
Utter hypocrisy is at work. When similar protests and riots broke out in Britain and France, the positions taken and the tones used by the above actors was very different. These actors framed the protests and riots in Britain and France as issues of law and order, using language very favourable to the British and French governments. Where were the statements of concern about the rights and safety of protesters from the US government and the European Commission when force was used by the British and French governments or when protesters died?
www.globalresearch.ca... /5370479
While not overlooking, disregarding, or devaluing the loss of life in Kiev, the roots of the violence there need to be discussed honestly and traced back. On the same note, it has to be understood that members of the Ukrainian opposition and their supporters were agitating for a violent confrontation against the Ukrainian government. There is no argument here against the right of citizens to protest, but rioting or taking up arms with the intent to oust a democratically-elected government is a different matter that no government in the US or the EU would accept on their own territory.
Best thing the USA could try and do is broker a deal.
Ukraine cedes Crimea to Russia (after a refreremdum in the crimea is done) and Ukraine gets it debts cancelled.