Radical science curriculum exposed for stating biological sex isn't binary

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: ancientlight

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Muldar

"The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."

OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Do you have a Y chromosome? No? Then you're a woman, otherwise you're a man. It's that simple. Nothing inbetween , just yes/no . You may feel attracted to the same gender, but that has NOTHING to do with biologics , which is chromosomes.

They believe there is a third chromosome as it seems.

It would be a shame not to teach the accepted medical science in high schools as that will disadvantage students going forward should they wish a profession in the medical field.

Teaching sex characteristics based on a male-female binary is inaccurate and outdated. We’ve also shown it negatively influences the healthcare of intersex individuals.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

Inclusive teaching and knowledge of sex variation can be transformative beyond anatomy.

Teaching sex characteristics as a continuum will increase the visibility and understanding of intersex. Removing the stigma associated with sex (and other) variations in anatomy, and medical and health education is essential for optimal health, well-being, belonging and connection for everyone.The Conversation

www.uow.edu.au...

edib.harvard.edu...

originally posted by: midicon

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Muldar

This "curriculum" is like right out of the communist playbook. A former KGB said this sort of stuff was what they used during Stalin's time to subvert the spiritual freedom of the people to demoralize people so they submit to the state and not a higher power that gives them moral integrity.

It's really hard to believe that people in authority and academia could ever be this stupid and foolish.

We don't need the 'spiritual', state or 'higher power'' to give us moral integrity.

In this particular instance, all we need is a little common sense.

Oh but you keep showing NO common sense so your little plan isn't working.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: ancientlight

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Muldar

"The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."

OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Do you have a Y chromosome? No? Then you're a woman, otherwise you're a man. It's that simple. Nothing inbetween , just yes/no . You may feel attracted to the same gender, but that has NOTHING to do with biologics , which is chromosomes.

They believe there is a third chromosome as it seems.

It would be a shame not to teach the accepted medical science in high schools as that will disadvantage students going forward should they wish a profession in the medical field.

Teaching sex characteristics based on a male-female binary is inaccurate and outdated. We’ve also shown it negatively influences the healthcare of intersex individuals.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

Inclusive teaching and knowledge of sex variation can be transformative beyond anatomy.

Teaching sex characteristics as a continuum will increase the visibility and understanding of intersex. Removing the stigma associated with sex (and other) variations in anatomy, and medical and health education is essential for optimal health, well-being, belonging and connection for everyone.The Conversation

www.uow.edu.au...

edib.harvard.edu...

That's not science but propaganda written by activists.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone


OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Science can be proven. This cannot, as it's all based on feelings. This isn't science, it's opinion and wrong opinion at that. Just more proof that idiots are the cause of all this. Congrats.

We all need to read that textbook and then read the cited sources, then decide if the science shows truth. Anyone actually read the textbook? No?

the theory that's being proposed here, is that the textbook is wrong. So no, I won't try to learn from it, I'll stick to the Biology and Science that has been proven true over my lifetime, and not even entertain a fringe idea brought by a political spat.

That's exactly what all of this narrative is, a theory not based in any facts.

You mean the transgender ideology.
Good we agree on something.

Now, you forgot to answer how many sexes are there? And what determines sex?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: ancientlight

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Muldar

"The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."

OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Do you have a Y chromosome? No? Then you're a woman, otherwise you're a man. It's that simple. Nothing inbetween , just yes/no . You may feel attracted to the same gender, but that has NOTHING to do with biologics , which is chromosomes.

They believe there is a third chromosome as it seems.

It would be a shame not to teach the accepted medical science in high schools as that will disadvantage students going forward should they wish a profession in the medical field.

Teaching sex characteristics based on a male-female binary is inaccurate and outdated. We’ve also shown it negatively influences the healthcare of intersex individuals.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

Inclusive teaching and knowledge of sex variation can be transformative beyond anatomy.

Teaching sex characteristics as a continuum will increase the visibility and understanding of intersex. Removing the stigma associated with sex (and other) variations in anatomy, and medical and health education is essential for optimal health, well-being, belonging and connection for everyone.The Conversation

www.uow.edu.au...

edib.harvard.edu...

These links you're presenting are far from being accepted science but personal opinions on some University websites.

Intersex is a sex development disorder and not a new sex.

It's a serious disorder in a few words.

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone


OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Science can be proven. This cannot, as it's all based on feelings. This isn't science, it's opinion and wrong opinion at that. Just more proof that idiots are the cause of all this. Congrats.

We all need to read that textbook and then read the cited sources, then decide if the science shows truth. Anyone actually read the textbook? No?

the theory that's being proposed here, is that the textbook is wrong. So no, I won't try to learn from it, I'll stick to the Biology and Science that has been proven true over my lifetime, and not even entertain a fringe idea brought by a political spat.

That's exactly what all of this narrative is, a theory not based in any facts.

You mean the transgender ideology.
Good we agree on something.

Now, you forgot to answer how many sexes are there? And what determines sex?

You know what I was referring to. Your questions can all be answered by reading the textbook.

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: ancientlight

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Muldar

"The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."

OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Do you have a Y chromosome? No? Then you're a woman, otherwise you're a man. It's that simple. Nothing inbetween , just yes/no . You may feel attracted to the same gender, but that has NOTHING to do with biologics , which is chromosomes.

They believe there is a third chromosome as it seems.

It would be a shame not to teach the accepted medical science in high schools as that will disadvantage students going forward should they wish a profession in the medical field.

Teaching sex characteristics based on a male-female binary is inaccurate and outdated. We’ve also shown it negatively influences the healthcare of intersex individuals.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

Inclusive teaching and knowledge of sex variation can be transformative beyond anatomy.

Teaching sex characteristics as a continuum will increase the visibility and understanding of intersex. Removing the stigma associated with sex (and other) variations in anatomy, and medical and health education is essential for optimal health, well-being, belonging and connection for everyone.The Conversation

www.uow.edu.au...

edib.harvard.edu...

These links you're presenting are far from being accepted science but personal opinions on some University websites.

Intersex is a sex development disorder and not a new sex.

It's a serious disorder in a few words.

It's not their opinions if they are actually using the science as teaching aids.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: ancientlight

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Muldar

"The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."

OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Do you have a Y chromosome? No? Then you're a woman, otherwise you're a man. It's that simple. Nothing inbetween , just yes/no . You may feel attracted to the same gender, but that has NOTHING to do with biologics , which is chromosomes.

They believe there is a third chromosome as it seems.

It would be a shame not to teach the accepted medical science in high schools as that will disadvantage students going forward should they wish a profession in the medical field.

Teaching sex characteristics based on a male-female binary is inaccurate and outdated. We’ve also shown it negatively influences the healthcare of intersex individuals.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

Inclusive teaching and knowledge of sex variation can be transformative beyond anatomy.

Teaching sex characteristics as a continuum will increase the visibility and understanding of intersex. Removing the stigma associated with sex (and other) variations in anatomy, and medical and health education is essential for optimal health, well-being, belonging and connection for everyone.The Conversation

www.uow.edu.au...

edib.harvard.edu...

These links you're presenting are far from being accepted science but personal opinions on some University websites.

Intersex is a sex development disorder and not a new sex.

It's a serious disorder in a few words.

It's not their opinions if they are actually using the science as teaching aids.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

The science doesn't support the nonsensical claims made by the trans lobby.

There is no science of a third sex.

And intersex is just a name for a serious disorder.

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: ancientlight

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Muldar

"The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."

OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Do you have a Y chromosome? No? Then you're a woman, otherwise you're a man. It's that simple. Nothing inbetween , just yes/no . You may feel attracted to the same gender, but that has NOTHING to do with biologics , which is chromosomes.

They believe there is a third chromosome as it seems.

It would be a shame not to teach the accepted medical science in high schools as that will disadvantage students going forward should they wish a profession in the medical field.

Teaching sex characteristics based on a male-female binary is inaccurate and outdated. We’ve also shown it negatively influences the healthcare of intersex individuals.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

Inclusive teaching and knowledge of sex variation can be transformative beyond anatomy.

Teaching sex characteristics as a continuum will increase the visibility and understanding of intersex. Removing the stigma associated with sex (and other) variations in anatomy, and medical and health education is essential for optimal health, well-being, belonging and connection for everyone.The Conversation

www.uow.edu.au...

edib.harvard.edu...

These links you're presenting are far from being accepted science but personal opinions on some University websites.

Intersex is a sex development disorder and not a new sex.

It's a serious disorder in a few words.

It's not their opinions if they are actually using the science as teaching aids.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

The science doesn't support the nonsensical claims made by the trans lobby.

There is no science of a third sex.

And intersex is just a name for a serious disorder.

Whatever it is, it is teaching chromosomal variances which any person contemplating a profession in the medical field needs to learn.

First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: ancientlight

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Muldar

"The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."

OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.

Do you have a Y chromosome? No? Then you're a woman, otherwise you're a man. It's that simple. Nothing inbetween , just yes/no . You may feel attracted to the same gender, but that has NOTHING to do with biologics , which is chromosomes.

They believe there is a third chromosome as it seems.

It would be a shame not to teach the accepted medical science in high schools as that will disadvantage students going forward should they wish a profession in the medical field.

Teaching sex characteristics based on a male-female binary is inaccurate and outdated. We’ve also shown it negatively influences the healthcare of intersex individuals.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

Inclusive teaching and knowledge of sex variation can be transformative beyond anatomy.

Teaching sex characteristics as a continuum will increase the visibility and understanding of intersex. Removing the stigma associated with sex (and other) variations in anatomy, and medical and health education is essential for optimal health, well-being, belonging and connection for everyone.The Conversation

www.uow.edu.au...

edib.harvard.edu...

These links you're presenting are far from being accepted science but personal opinions on some University websites.

Intersex is a sex development disorder and not a new sex.

It's a serious disorder in a few words.

It's not their opinions if they are actually using the science as teaching aids.

Both the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales are developing inclusive anatomy curricula within their medicine and health degrees. Harvard Medical School and University of British Columbia are also developing online, accessible resources to promote inclusive anatomical representation in medical education.

The science doesn't support the nonsensical claims made by the trans lobby.

There is no science of a third sex.

And intersex is just a name for a serious disorder.

Whatever it is, it is teaching chromosomal variances which any person contemplating a profession in the medical field needs to learn.

Yes, I am sure they will.
But I am also sure nobody entertains the multiple sexes theories apart from the trans activists. Even they know sex is binary.

originally posted by: Annee
First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

This study only addresses sexual behaviour from their genome nothing for transgendered expression.

It is worth keeping in mind that this study only covers some types of sexuality — gay, lesbian and cis-straight — but doesn’t offer many insights into gender identity. In other words, the team only looked at the “LGB” within the acronym LGBTQIA+.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” said Ben Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute who led the study. “Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behavior.”

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee
First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

This study only addresses sexual behaviour from their genome.

It is worth keeping in mind that this study only covers some types of sexuality — gay, lesbian and cis-straight — but doesn’t offer many insights into gender identity. In other words, the team only looked at the “LGB” within the acronym LGBTQIA+.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” said Ben Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute who led the study. “Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behavior.”

I know.

Point is science can not prove it scientifically.

There are too many variables.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee
First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

This study only addresses sexual behaviour from their genome.

It is worth keeping in mind that this study only covers some types of sexuality — gay, lesbian and cis-straight — but doesn’t offer many insights into gender identity. In other words, the team only looked at the “LGB” within the acronym LGBTQIA+.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” said Ben Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute who led the study. “Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behavior.”

I know.

Point is science can not prove it scientifically.

There are too many variables.

The "radical" science curriculum as is the topic of this thread only shows chromosomal variances (intersex) and everyone is up in arms.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee
First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

This study only addresses sexual behaviour from their genome nothing for transgendered expression.

It is worth keeping in mind that this study only covers some types of sexuality — gay, lesbian and cis-straight — but doesn’t offer many insights into gender identity. In other words, the team only looked at the “LGB” within the acronym LGBTQIA+.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” said Ben Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute who led the study. “Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behavior.”

What does transgenderism has to do with science and the number of sexes.

Transgenderism is a debunked pseudo-philosophy.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee
First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

This study only addresses sexual behaviour from their genome.

It is worth keeping in mind that this study only covers some types of sexuality — gay, lesbian and cis-straight — but doesn’t offer many insights into gender identity. In other words, the team only looked at the “LGB” within the acronym LGBTQIA+.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” said Ben Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute who led the study. “Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behavior.”

I know.

Point is science can not prove it scientifically.

There are too many variables.

The "radical" science curriculum as is the topic of this thread only shows chromosomal variances (intersex) and everyone is up in arms.

If you understood what chromosomal variance is then you wouldn't be taking part in these discussions claiming there are more than 2 sexes.

originally posted by: quintessentone

The "radical" science curriculum as is the topic of this thread only shows chromosomal variances (intersex) and everyone is up in arms.

If you can't scientifically prove the simple -- heterosexuality.

Don't throw "science" at me to prove the complex.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee
First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

This study only addresses sexual behaviour from their genome.

It is worth keeping in mind that this study only covers some types of sexuality — gay, lesbian and cis-straight — but doesn’t offer many insights into gender identity. In other words, the team only looked at the “LGB” within the acronym LGBTQIA+.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” said Ben Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute who led the study. “Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behavior.”

I know.

Point is science can not prove it scientifically.

There are too many variables.

When gender ideologues speak about what science can prove or not, is at this point you understand the level of confusion within the gender identity ideology.

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee
First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

This study only addresses sexual behaviour from their genome.

It is worth keeping in mind that this study only covers some types of sexuality — gay, lesbian and cis-straight — but doesn’t offer many insights into gender identity. In other words, the team only looked at the “LGB” within the acronym LGBTQIA+.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” said Ben Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute who led the study. “Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behavior.”

I know.

Point is science can not prove it scientifically.

There are too many variables.

When gender ideologues speak about what science can prove or not, is at this point you understand the level of confusion within the gender identity ideology.

If prestigious universities such as Harvard will be using this science as a teaching tool, then there is no confusion for me.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Muldar

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Annee
First -- prove scientifically what makes a person heterosexual.

Has nothing to do with physical parts.

There is no ‘gay gene.’ There is no ‘straight gene.’ Sexuality is just complex, study confirms

Sexuality cannot be pinned down by biology, psychology or life experiences, this study and others show, because human sexual attraction is decided by all these factors.

www.pbs.org...

This study only addresses sexual behaviour from their genome.

It is worth keeping in mind that this study only covers some types of sexuality — gay, lesbian and cis-straight — but doesn’t offer many insights into gender identity. In other words, the team only looked at the “LGB” within the acronym LGBTQIA+.

“It’s effectively impossible to predict an individual’s sexual behavior from their genome,” said Ben Neale, a geneticist at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Broad Institute who led the study. “Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behavior.”

I know.

Point is science can not prove it scientifically.

There are too many variables.

When gender ideologues speak about what science can prove or not, is at this point you understand the level of confusion within the gender identity ideology.

If prestigious universities such as Harvard will be using this science as a teaching tool, then there is no confusion for me.

Harvard doesn't teach the transgender nonsense. Nor does it teach there are multiple sexes. These are nonsense coming from the trans lobby