It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Is there another you reading this article at this exact moment in a parallel universe? Dr. Brian Greene, author of The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos, believes that this freakish quirk of nature may exist; and he discusses its amazing possibilities in this 3-minute TV interview.
A growing number of cosmologists agree with Greene that we are but one of many universes and at least one of these other worlds lies close to ours, maybe only a millimeter away. We can’t see this world, because it exists in a type of space different from the four dimensions of our everyday reality. MIT’s Max Tegmark believes this multiverse model of ‘many universes’ is grounded in modern physics and will eventually be testable, predictive and disprovable. “This is not sci-fi,” he says, “its real science.” As research at the CERN Large Hadron Collider progresses, scientists are talking increasingly of a “new physics” on the horizon, which promise to help researchers understand more of the unknowns about our universe. This new approach includes developing a better understanding of dark energy, a mystery force that some forward thinkers believe indicates that a ‘sister’ universe lurks in our neighborhood. Strange happenings have been observed by cosmologists such as the Andromeda galaxy, 2.2 million light-years away speeding towards the Milky Way at 200,000 mph. This phenomenon makes sense logically if gravity leaking from an invisible universe were pulling the two galaxies together. Researchers at the WMAP space telescope recently discovered a force 10,000 times larger than the Milky Way, which they believe offers powerful evidence that a parallel universe may be in the area.
Alundra
What many people theorized and/or believed may become a reality soon, personally I think parallel "worlds" (or dimensions) exist.
Alundra
reply to post by HanzHenry
Interesting. Could it maybe have been a lucid dream ?
en.wikipedia.org...
HanzHenry
Alundra
reply to post by HanzHenry
Interesting. Could it maybe have been a lucid dream ?
en.wikipedia.org...
I did not feel as if I was dreaming. And the city looked like futuristic one with weird shaped shiny metallic buildings and there was a war going on. One time thing I will always remember, kind of wish I could get hypnotized and have an artist draw what I describe. Was curious if anyone else has been to this place, the night had a reddish sunset glow in the sky instead of dark black like on earth. And the boats were a dark blue, along with the uniforms we were wearing.
The canals were approx. 100ft wide, the buildings were typical height for a big city. the weirdest part was the gunwales of the ship were unsually high, along with the bow. I woke up with that feeling you get after being on the water all day and you are in bed. That rocking motion, I swear I was there.
OP.....
what if some other parallel world stole our 1980's paradise and gave us their Bizarro 'just following orders' tyranny?
AND I THINK the parallel worlds would be a lot like Sliders. And there could really be CroMags.
maybe that was the war!.
AliceBleachWhite
reply to post by Alundra
I'm not so sure these are already extent, but, alternatives will certainly be created as a result of Time Travel in consideration that once something is observed, it stays observed and indestructible.
In other words, you can go back in time and save JFK, or change 'history' any which way one desires, but, the originating timeline remains in-tact while any changes enacted create an alternative.
So, yes, one could save JFK and then come back to their original point of reference without any changes in evidence, or, choose to follow that alternative to whatever conclusion.
MichiganSwampBuck
IMO, an alternate universe literally doesn't exist in our reality and you would have to cease existing in our universe if you somehow passed into another.
TheDualityExperience
Hypothetically how does a person come back to the original point of reference if the lines diverge the moment a change is made?
If something stays "observed and indestructible", how does this rule apply to a person if they did make it back to the original point of reference where the said changes have not occurred? Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you are trying to articulate.