It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The findings from the Institute for Fiscal Studies conclude that those born in the 60’s and 70’s ‘are facing a triple whammy of meagre pay rises, inadequate pensions and soaring property prices’. All of which means that they will have less financial security in their old age, than their parents or those born in the decades before them.
There is a very simple reason for that.
Rather than extending the benefits, rights and freedoms won by UK citizens in the post WWII period, subsequent generations sold them away instead.
Freeborn
I'd suggest a good dose of Dickens for those who wish to see what the future might have in store for this country
Family Allowances Act 1945, National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act 1946, National Insurance Act 1946, National Health Service Act 1946, Pensions (Increase) Act 1947, Landlord and Tenant (Rent Control) Act 1949, National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act 1948, National Insurance Act 1949.
i have said it before-the country is now 1 big stafford hospital,. www.telegraph.co.uk...
yorkshirelad
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
The current "reducing the defecit" is a smokescreen for the real activity, namely, the ideology of rolling back of all state institutions back to the victorian days. Over 100 years of social progress dumped in order to ensure the rich get ever richer.
To any die hard tories please explain this : If the purpose of the current government financial policy is to improve the "purse strings" why are they intent on privatising the east coast railway? Reminder : ALL private franchises that ran that line failed, made a loss, poor service and cost the taxpayer money. The current public railway company is for the first time making money, improving the service and giving money back to the taxpayer! There is only one reason to privatise : Ideology.
The ONLY reason a private company is better than a public one is that a public one MUST publish a true account of itself, everything is on the table for all to see. A private company hides details behind corporate policy making it look better than it is. Hence the "shock and suprise" when a supposed profitable company suddenly goes bust having made real losses for years ......
symptomoftheuniverse
Only the white british are labled scrounging chavs but immigrants are double plus good.
All the ills on this thread just happen to occur with the influx of immigrants. Foodbank charities are already advertising on T.V.
Why and who are they doing this to us,because whoever it is ,they are not British.
Who have told you that? I invite you to take a bus ride through sheffield. Thousands of immigrants stood about all day,sitting and drinking till the sun goes down. You never saw indiginous people do this. Everyone in sheffield have seen them have you? www.abovetopsecret.com...
Painterz
symptomoftheuniverse
Only the white british are labled scrounging chavs but immigrants are double plus good.
All the ills on this thread just happen to occur with the influx of immigrants. Foodbank charities are already advertising on T.V.
Why and who are they doing this to us,because whoever it is ,they are not British.
To be honest I think I disagree with that. The portrayal of immigrants in the media is pretty awful, you'd think they were a legion of Hitlers coming to Steal Our Women from what the papers all say about the evil layabout immigrants coming here to sponge off our benefits.
I think the truth of the matter is, and there's pretty solid economic data to back this up, that immigration actually nets a positive effect into the governments coffers. Most immigrants come here, work, pay taxes, and as a result immigrants pay more into the system than they take out.