It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
UPDATE – 2:20 PM EST: It is now being reported by Reuters that a wedding convoy was mistaken for an al Qaeda convoy in a drone attack that killed fifteen people.
Ten were killed in the initial attack, according to Yemen security officials. Five injured died at a hospital. Five more were injured. No details on what happened to the al Qaeda convoy that was supposed to be attacked but escaped a drone, which President Barack Obama has touted as being “very precise.”
If the CIA or Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) intended to hit an al Qaeda convoy but hit a wedding convoy instead—by mistake, where is the al Qaeda convoy now? Or, was a drone attack launched with bad intelligence that suggested the wedding convoy was the al Qaeda convoy?
PlanetXisHERE
Do strikes like this actually accomplish the aims of the "War on Terror", or do they breed more fanatics? I like to think of myself as a fairly rational and calm person, though if this happened to my family I'd probably not rest till the end of my days to bring retribution to the culprits, and I'm not even a religious fundamentalist, and I don't think religion actually has anything to do with it.
jude11
reply to post by CoolStoryMan
"US Drone Mistakes Wedding Convoy..."
It's not the drone that makes the mistake but rather the trigger happy psychopaths at the controls playing their little video game without consequences.
AutumnWitch657
reply to post by CoolStoryMan
Come back when it's reported by a news agency with some credentials.
This site sayings Reuters is reporting it does not mean Reuters is really reporting it.
I just checked their site And I didn't see the story. You're welcome to check yourself. Which you might have done before you posted this.
www.reuters.com...
peck420
Reuters
Huffington Post
Fox News
BBC
Washington Post
beezzer
This will get zero play in America or the west.
Now ten years from now, when a wedding party is leaving the church in Plainsville, Nebraska and is struck by an armed drone, people will get all upset and wonder why people don't do anything.
It's gonna happen people.
Brotherman
America one day will not be the only power in the world that will control stealth drones, it is only a matter of time before someone else will build a low orbit earth drone that has precision strike capability. I am afraid to say it because the implications are high but depending on who gets one I believe there will be some to pay the piper.
It is reasons like these I have always did not like drones because I know some twit and his buddies huddle around a computer like a game in some AF Base flying these things from 1000s of miles away high fiveing each other when things like this happens. It is cruel deceptive and heartless, I understand war for the guys on the ground is cruel and deceptive, but it isnt heartless. Lots of the guys on the ground often suffer for the rest of their lives due to the element that they are human and were there to see smell hear and feel what transpired on the battlefield, ultimate losses even when the battle is won these guys learn eventually they never really won anything. The guy at the computer is alot less likely to care, I know some drone "pilots" do not always feel this way and become very depressed and sad some suffer ptsd. In my opinion if this is true about the marriage convoy it is a blatant violation of the rules of engagement particularly that first part that tells you that you cannot kill anyone without proper target identification, I was always taught in the USMC to know your target and what lays beyond. This disheartend me a little bit more reading this.
AutumnWitch657
reply to post by CoolStoryMan
Come back when it's reported by a news agency with some credentials.
This site sayings Reuters is reporting it does not mean Reuters is really reporting it.
I just checked their site And I didn't see the story. You're welcome to check yourself. Which you might have done before you posted this.
www.reuters.com...
Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar of human life and that free men do not forfeit their security, contrary to Bush's claim that we hate freedom.
If so, then let him explain to us why we don't strike for example - Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters don't possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 - may Allah have mercy on them.
No, we fight because we are free men who don't sleep under oppression. We want to restore freedom to our nation, just as you lay waste to our nation. So shall we lay waste to yours.
No one except a dumb thief plays with the security of others and then makes himself believe he will be secure. Whereas thinking people, when disaster strikes, make it their priority to look for its causes, in order to prevent it happening again.
Full transcript of bin Ladin speech
beezzer
This will get zero play in America or the west.
Now ten years from now, when a wedding party is leaving the church in Plainsville, Nebraska and is struck by an armed drone, people will get all upset and wonder why people don't do anything.
It's gonna happen people.