It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On August 14th, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) unveiled a system for giving non-technical names to exoplanets that involves public input, reversing its opinion on the public’s role in naming planets (see this Universe Today article). In a previous statement this spring, the IAU announced that it only endorsed the technical naming scheme that has been common practice in the scientific community, resulting in names such as Kepler-16 b (the “Tatooine” planet with two suns) and GJ 1214 b (a potential water world).
The IAU’s reversal of opinion on public involvement in naming exoplanets seems to stem directly from this criticism. However, the IAU’s colloquial naming scheme comes with a list of rules. For instance, a planet name cannot be the same an existing name for an astronomical object, nor can it be profane or offensive. (See this XKCD comic for some bad ideas.)
One criterion is that the discoverers must approve the proposed planet name. While this seems reasonable, large, modern planet surveys (such as the Kepler Mission) require follow-up observations from many different teams to confirm the existence of a planet. Usually, many scientists study and characterize a planet before the scientific community accepts its planetary status. In these cases, who is the main “discoverer” of the planet who gets to approve the public’s chosen name? Also, this criterion can be at odds with the IAU’s other planet naming rules. For instance, Xavier Dumusque, the principal author on the discovery paper of Alpha Centauri Bb, endorsed Uwingu’s naming competition. However, the IAU’s current naming policy does not allow fundraisers as a means of generating planet names, in direct contradiction with Dumusque’s desire.
0bserver1
reply to post by JadeStar
Cool,and only for 4, 99 a piece. Its bargain for naming a planet after yourself."
Public naming campaigns are also “sanctioned” given they follow a set of rules:
1. Prior to any public naming initiative, often a vote (hereafter “the process”), the IAU should be contacted from the start by Letter of Intent sent to the IAU General Secretary;
2. The process should be submitted in the form of a proposal to the IAU by an organization. Scientists or science communicators may be involved in the process;
3. The organization should list its legal or official representatives and its goals, and explain the reasons for initiating the process for naming a particular object or set of objects;
4. The process cannot request nor make reference to any revenues, for whatever purpose;
5. The process must guarantee a wide international participation;
6. The public names proposed (whether by individuals or in a naming campaign)should follow the naming rules and restrictions adopted for Minor Bodies of the Solar System, by the IAU and by the Minor Planet Center.
Among other rules are that proposed names should be 16 characters or less in length, pronounceable in as many languages as possible, non-offensive in any language or culture, and that names of individuals, places or events principally known for political or military activities are unsuitable.
Also, the names must have the formal agreement of the discoverers.
Read more: www.universetoday.com...
Aleister
reply to post by JadeStar
Dude!
No, not the OP, that's what a planets name should be.
Dude!
That one is for the OP. Nice thread. By the time they're done planets should be named for every character and actor in "Star Trek", authors Heinlein, Bradbury, Bova, and Burroughs (among many), and for Anne Hathaway. To name just a few.
-- Aleister
No, not me. A planet!
dodol
reply to post by JadeStar
how about renaming a planet?
planet earth sounds urrgghly...
jk
anyway nice post, brother
Nyiah
You know Trekkies worldwide have already, umpteen times, suggested Andoria, Vulcan, Risa, Romulus & Remus, Breen, Q'onos, Forcas, Khitomer, Rura Penthe, Nimbus, Cardassia, Bajor, Lissepia, Ferenginar, Luria, Trill, Benzar, Bolarus, Betazed, Iconia, Nausicaa, Tarkalea, Tellar and endless others. I can get behind naming a couple of cold icebox planets Andoria & Rura Penthe
According to science writer Govert Schilling, Brown initially wanted to call the object "Lila", after a concept in Hindu mythology that described the cosmos as the outcome of a game played by Brahma. The name was very similar to "Lilah", the name of Brown's newborn daughter.
Brown was mindful of not making his name public before it had been officially accepted. He had done so with Sedna a year previously, and had been heavily criticised. However, he listed the address of his personal web page announcing the discovery as /~mbrown/planetlila and in the chaos following the controversy over the discovery of Haumea, forgot to change it. Rather than needlessly anger more of his fellow astronomers, he simply said that the webpage had been named for his daughter and dropped "Lila" from consideration.
Brown had also speculated that Persephone, the wife of the god Pluto, would be a good name for the object.
The name had been used several times in science fiction,and was popular with the public, having handily won a poll conducted by New Scientist magazine ("Xena", despite only being a nickname, came fourth).
However, this was not possible once the object was classified as a dwarf planet, because there is already an asteroid with that name, 399 Persephone.
Because IAU regulations require a name from creation mythology for objects with orbital stability beyond Neptune's orbit, the team had also been considering such possibilities.
With the dispute resolved, the discovery team proposed Eris on September 6, 2006. On September 13, 2006 this name was accepted as the official name by the IAU.[39][40] Brown decided that, because the object had been considered a planet for so long, it deserved a name from Greek or Roman mythology, like the other planets. However, the asteroids had taken the vast majority of Graeco-Roman names. Eris, whom Brown described as his favourite goddess, had fortunately escaped inclusion. The name in part reflects the discord in the astronomical community caused by the debate over the object's (and Pluto's) nature.
JadeStar
And sorry I don't think we'll see a planet named Ear or a planet named after any body part because that would set up a slippery slope to distastefull names as I am sure you can imagine.
JadeStar
And sorry I don't think we'll see a planet named Ear or a planet named after any body part because that would set up a slippery slope to distasteful names as I am sure you can imagine.
edit on 9-12-2013 by JadeStar because: (no reason given)
kingears
JadeStar
And sorry I don't think we'll see a planet named Ear or a planet named after any body part because that would set up a slippery slope to distasteful names as I am sure you can imagine.
edit on 9-12-2013 by JadeStar because: (no reason given)
Ear is a tad different to penis or vagina. I don't really get your point here