It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The alleged theft is one of the largest since bitcoin was created four years ago.
Bitcoin has no central authority and is not backed by governments or banks.
A bitcoin user who calls himself TradeFortress told ABC more than 4,100 bitcoins worth about $1.1million (£585,000) were stolen from him.
He says he is not much older than 18 and he knows the chances of getting any of the digital currency back is unlikely because all bitcoin transactions cannot be reversed.
As the transactions are all anonymous, speculation has arisen that this was an inside job and TradeFortress took the coins for himself.
However, the young man strenuously denied the allegations - but admitted he was unlikely to report the theft to police.
TKDRL
reply to post by PhoenixOD
Would be a terribly stupid thing for an insider to do. I am not the smartest guy in the world, even I could see the high possibility of the currency value plummeting to rock bottom when everyone sees the theft.
TKDRL
Well that puts a serious damper on things..... I thought you would need a NSA sized processor farm to do that? Hmmmmm, maybe that's exactly who did it.
rigel4
TKDRL
Well that puts a serious damper on things..... I thought you would need a NSA sized processor farm to do that? Hmmmmm, maybe that's exactly who did it.
Most likely was the NSA.. in an attempt to discredit bit-coin.
Questions should be asked even so.. because it demonstrates that bit-coin
is vulnerable.
edit on 10-11-2013 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)
PhoenixOD
rigel4
TKDRL
Well that puts a serious damper on things..... I thought you would need a NSA sized processor farm to do that? Hmmmmm, maybe that's exactly who did it.
Most likely was the NSA.. in an attempt to discredit bit-coin.
Questions should be asked even so.. because it demonstrates that bit-coin
is vulnerable.
edit on 10-11-2013 by rigel4 because: (no reason given)
It demonstrates that the site might have been vulnerable IF it was an out side hacker. But if it was an inside job it doesn't demonstrate anything.
Either way it doesnt demonstrate that bitcoin is vulnerable.
Erongaricuaro
Why am I not terribly surprised? I would not rule out the alphabet agencies too quickly either. Not everyone is all that friendly about new currencies that are not bankster-owned.
Eryiedes
Hola,
I personally don't subscribe to digital currencies.
I never have and never will do financial transactions over the internet for any reason.
If it isn't physically in your hand...you don't own it.
IMO, the only thing a person with a lot of bitcoins should do is buy physical silver, gold, platinum and/or palladium and take demand delivery of those assets.
Computerized money is the only thing easier to steal than fiat either by being hacked, betrayed or just having your computer or laptop physically stolen.
At least in a vault (as in the case of PM's) you'd still have it guarded by a man with a gun and a REALLY big metal door. Meanwhile what's protecting your laptop? A cat...a bird...a goldfish...an aloe plant...a roomie with chronic insomnia?
Think I'll just stay with PM's.
-Amitabha-