It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I feel I can observe, or objectify, any one of these parts of self, by identifying with another part.
In cases of imbalance or conflict between them, yes, I do think that one part can desire and clamor for "killing" or eliminating another part.
To talk with any authority about the ego, one must know what an ego is. Therein lies the difficulty.
Discovering the ego for the sake of examination is actually quite impossible.
At least to my knowledge, nothing called an ego has ever been witnessed, and I would wager that no such entity or substance exists to be discovered. Yet, perhaps I am blind, because there is quite the dogma surrounding the idea that everyone, including myself, is endowed with this entity or substance, and that we should go to great lengths to suppress, and sometimes kill, this illusive spirit.
What is it that we label “ego”?
The only thing we ever point at in regards to an ego is to ourselves. This can be proven by trying to point out one’s own ego. Even when we think about our ego, we are really only thinking about ourselves. When we think of a friend’s ego, we really only think of that friend, or at least, the experiences we’ve had of them. We have yet to behold or perceive anything other than these beings.
Souls, selves, egos, bodies, spirits, minds, consciousnesses, humans, Homo Erectus, I, me, she, we—there is really only one entity found beneath these labels at all times. However, what we choose to call this being is entirely up to the one speaking.
The ego is also synonymous with personal identity, which really amounts to no more than how we look, how we talk, how we dress and, sometimes, how we think. When we are speaking about identity, we are once again only really talking about ourselves, our clothes, our names and whatever other baubles and fancies we’ve gathered along the course of our lives. Is the ego our clothing? Is the ego our name?
Suppose one wanted to do away with the “ego”, and in doing so changed his name, chose to wore rags, grew a beard and began to wander the earth as a sage. Has he killed or in any harmed an ego? He hasn’t.
The sage merely looks different and chooses, by the power of his own faculties, to think of certain things and act a certain way. If anything, the ego in this instance has triumphed, as only egotism would inspire one to change his appearance.
When one tells me I should check my ego, I get the odd feeling that they don’t like the way I act, and they would rather see that I instead act like them, as their "ego" would.
When one tells me to kill my ego, they must offend themselves by my very sight, enough so to want to see me remove my clothes, my name, and my identity, my "ego", so that I may instead, once again, act like them
They therefore must hold themselves in higher regard than I to state this with such conviction. Well...isn't that a glaring instance of egotism?
Sadly, I cannot find any ego to critique, as end up only critiquing myself, and others.
Just want to add, I hope we can make this discussion very civil, equal, honest, and respectful.
There is no difficulty. There are branches of thought, philosophy, esoteric religions which are experts in matters of the ego. We can always start with authority on the subject.
A monk who has spent the last 30 years observing and knowing the ego and all of its aspects will be much more of an authority than you or I. Just like an accredited doctor, scientists, mechanic with 30+ years of experienced in their own fields are much more experts in their chosen field of expertise than either one of us.
Not according to all the branches of thought I mentioned above. In my own practice, it has been quite easy to observe, examine, and learn about my own ego after reading the right materials that point out what to do and how to do it.
You refer to yourself as "I" and witness how your very own ego superimposes ideas and concepts over reality, labeling things with conceptual thought. That is the ego and now that it has been pointed out, you can now witness it.
It is that which thinks, thinker of thoughts, labeler of things, concepts, day dreamer, illusions, self reference mechanism, etc.
I don't perceive myself as one whole complete entity. I perceive a body, an ego, a witness, 5 senses, a subconscious, various connections to an Absolute reality which I am also part of, and many other aspects. When I perceive "friends", I see them as a conglomerate of these aspects as well, that's why when they do/say something stupid, I can forgive, because I know the genuine part of them, not the ego or things done when drunk, mad, sad, jealous, etc
What is this One entity beneath all these labels then?
Ego is only the self referenced thinker of thoughts. Whatever you think of your self image, clothing, looks, names is all ego.
How do you know? Have you found somebody like this, were able to crawl inside their subjective experience, and see for yourself if their ego has really died? No you haven't, and therefore you are announcing a relative opinion.
There are literally thousands of testimonies on the internet of people experiencing ego death, temporarily, and maybe a hundred or few dozen who testify that there is a permanent ego death based on various systems and blueprints that allow you to do this.
I've told plenty of people to check their ego, and check on mine daily. That doesn't mean that I want you to "act" like me. I simply say this because know that there is a real you that is prior to the ego that is loving, caring, brilliant, spacious, expansive, and has access to its Source.
Some People say this, because they know that the cause of all wars, rapes, murders, pillage, corruption, thievery, and all the worlds ills is due to the ego. IF you get rid of your own by using one of or a combo of the 100's of methods tht are out there, then you find peace, Love, Contentment, compassion, and no longer have the need to say anything cause its all seen and figured out.
Perhaps you haven't looked in the correct place. I found that I can be with ego, or be with no ego (especially in meditation when there is no thought), and remember as a child when there was still no Ego in me. Clearly it is something that forms eventually and is added unto you, a thing which was not there before.
In me there is not only a distance between ME as witness, and the Ego that I witness, but I also see it is attached to a rich subconscious, and also the ego has a source from which it comes from. I've found the inner chnanel the ego uses to travel through the body, where it goes when deep sleep arrives, have found my own soul in the heart, rich with memories of my life prior to being born on earth, and have rich/deep knowledge of myself which most don't have.
So it seems you are coming from a place of not knowing, therefore assuming and projecting. Am I wrong?
Appealing to authority is somewhat of a fallacy. Because someone who believes they know more than I does not negate my arguments.
I see no problem, however, if you were to use their arguments against mine.
According to me it is. I still believe there is nothing inside or outside of us that we can call an ego. These materials, I think, are lacking in anything concrete, and are entirely riddled with verbal swindles and fantasy. Of course, this is opinion, but so is the opposite.
I mentioned in the OP that when we try to point out an ego, we merely point to ourselves.
Yes, it is true that humans conceive, refer to themselves through the use of pronouns, that I agree. But to say that it is an ego, and not this being refering to itself, is to label a reality with conceptual thought.
Egos don't have thoughts, nor can they say words for they do not possess a mouth. Or human an ego are one and the same.
Yes, a human being does do this; but it is the human being, and not anything called an ego that operates in this manner. Egos could only do this if they had thoughts, a mouth, a brain. If they do, then ego and human are one and the same.
Maybe that is where we differ. I see myself as a complete being and others as complete beings. I can confirm this with both my thoughts and my senses.
Nothing but books and words have tried to say otherwise.
For me, it is this complete being, the human being, that is the entity beneath all of these labels. Whatever we call it, whether human or ego, is entirely up to the one talking about it.
The one that thinks thoughts is the human being. To say that it is an ego that thinks, and not this human being, is to say egos think thoughts. If egos think thoughts, the ego and human are one and the same.
Whatever we call it, whether human or ego, is entirely up to the one talking about it.
The one that thinks thoughts is the human being. To say that it is an ego that thinks, and not this human being, is to say egos think thoughts. If egos think thoughts, the ego and human are one and the same.
Well, as I have understood the ego, this is merely another word and concept for the being that utters these words and concepts, as you yourself pointed out. This being, is still alive, and therefore we can still call him "ego", and whatever other names we wish.
There are also thousands of testimonies on the internet of people seeing Jesus in a peice of toast.
This is assuming that I am not loving, caring, and brilliant right now. Such an assumption is merely conception, perhaps by an ego, but let's be honest, most likely by you.
Only the human being is capable of war, rape and murder. Consquently, only the human being is capable of love, contentment and compassion. No ego is capable of raising a finger, for it has none. If it does, then human and ego are one and the same. What name shall we choose today?
As a being with eyes and capable of thought and judgement, I have completely observed myself for a long number of years. Where else should I look?
I hear you call yourself I, ego, soul, Me, witness, subconscious, source, the body, soul, myself, and still I can only imagine one thing saying these words.
I am also reminded of your earlier statement: "You refer to yourself as "I" and witness how your very own ego superimposes ideas and concepts over reality, labeling things with conceptual thought. That is the ego and now that it has been pointed out, you can now witness it. "
There is no ego. End of story. If there was, I'm sure we could find out what it is and discuss its properties. But what is it we are actually talking about?
It is tied to nothing because it is nothing. Egos, being nothing, are incapable of deciding, or serving itself, because there is nothing there to serve. It is nothing but a bogey man, ....
So......to summarize , you are spiritually superior to Ninja here? And it is important to you that he understand that, as well as any other people who might be reading along?
This topic always ends up in the same place. .
dominicus
It does? WHat place is that? If you take note, I have note once claimed to be better or superior. Have only claimed to posses knowledge & experiences which most people do not have. Just like a master mechanic possesses knowledge/experiences which I also do not have. No biggie
To claim possess knowledge which most people do not have is to claim superiority over said "most people" in that specific area.
Your posts claim spiritual superiority.
But that is where discussions about ego usually end up- spiritual dick measuring matches.
One of the things I personally like about ego? The ability to say "this is mine, not anyone elses." That allows one to remain loyal to their specific perception of reality , while also not imposing it on others!
It does negate your argument because those "experts" who have found this "ego death" have left behind blueprints on how they got there, saying: "Don't merely believe it, go see and check for yourself if it is real as a direct living experience beyond mere belief, opinion, ideas, concepts."
I have experienced myself may of these things, so direct experience most definitely defies and in many ways negates your critique. Now we can turn the question around and ask, have you studied these blueprints and found the same thing as these other experts have found?
If the answer is "no, I've never followed these blueprints," then we can conclude that you are coming from a place of assumptions and projections.
Yes, that's what I'm doing. Are you anger? Or does anger arise, stay for a while, then eventually subside? Are you lust? Or does lust arise, stay for a while until something is done about it, then subside?
Perhaps the material that's out there has flown entirely over your head and you just don't get it.
For me, personally, I can give you my own example. In my circle of friends, family, etc I am known as someone who has a very well formed and articulate intellect, but it still took me roughly 10 years of study and practice to comprehend the depths of the ego.
And I have experienced Ego death and separation from it 3 ways:
1. Got deep into Christianity, practiced the precepts, got Baptised, and then eventually a Mystical Grace visited me and shattered me, killed me, and it was as if I was born again with higher spiritual faculties and my old self reference had died.
2. Some fragments of ego remained, then years later read a Zen Koan, wrestled with it, and within 20 minutes shifted into the Observer/Witnessed state which is prior to ego/mind/thinker of thoughts/self reference. A direct experience of a shift occured, but did not stabilize nor remain that way.
3. Became friends with a Buddhist who is stabilized in the Witness and detached from Ego, and he merely leaned over to me to say something, his consciousness effected mine, and immediately I shifted again into Witness and stayed there this time, stabilizing the state.
IF you have no idea or never had any of these experiences, how can I possibly even continue to have this conversation with you? Whereas I have met maybe roughly 50 or more people in my life on retreat, in certain circles, all of who have also experienced these things.
WHat is "ourselves"? Are you thoughts? Anger? Happiness? The Debater of this thread? Or does these aspects arise then fall away?
YEs we are both "labeling reality with conceptual thought" for the sake of debate. But what I am saying, is that there is a real you prior to an ego that does exist, and when you find that real you, it will lead you to an experiential absolute reality prior to all conceptual thought.
When you look at a tree there is a number of items happening. There is a tree, there is you, there is eyes that are seeing, then the ego labels that image that eyes see and digs into memory to retrieve the word for it, called "tree", thinks the word, can add more to it like nice, or big, or green tree, and can even decide to say the word "tree". There is a number of processes going on here. Behind all of these processes, if you learn to be mindful, is a witness who is aware of these processes, but is not itself a process.
When there is an urge that arises to urinate, is it you that has to pee, or is the bladder sending a signal using the nervous system, up to the brain, letting the brain know that it has a feeling of fullness and needs expelling? Which one is it?
Are you your limbs? Or do you refer to them as yours? "My leg itches." My arm hurts." Note how veterans come back without limbs, yet still exist. We can take this further to discussing the thinking mind.
Sit there, for example for an our straight in one position, trying not to think. Guess what happens? A flood of thoughts continues to emerge and you have absolutely no control what-so-ever to stop any of it. If you do, you'll be lucky to get a second of no-thought in, if even that.
Ask 100 people if they feel complete, and to be honest, and chances are the majority will say no.
Do you feel complete, do you desire anything, do you want, are you a master of yourself, can you stop the mind from thinking, withstand 5 days with no food, have you found the source of thought within, are you content?
Yet you yourself have used books and words via education, are the key things that allow you to formulate this very thread.
I remember before I was born, existing as consciousness, without a body, without an ego, and know a handful of people, some here on ATS as well, who also remember prior to being born. So yes, perhaps we are human beings, here, now. But we have a past that comes before being human, and will have a future that transcends it as well.
Within those "blueprints" must be some sort of proof that what these experts are finding ways around actually exists.
Please bring it forward if you wish. But saying I am wrong because others claim they are right do not negate my arguments.
As I've said, I directly experience myself every minute of every day. Out of that experience I have never found an ego. All you've been able to do is assert, without argument or reason, that there is one. Blueprints are not required in order to experience oneself.
Like everyone, I am capable of anger and lust, yes. Do I consist of anger and lust? No.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that this actually happened as you relate. But anecdotal evidence of these strange entities proves nothing of their existence.
These aren't aspects. They are instances, images and articulations of me functioning in different ways.
You've simply called me different names. It is word-salad, used to garnish the main course.
They are instances, images and articulations of me functioning in different ways.
Or perhaps it is void of meaning.
Then where? Yes I was once a child but no longer. Where is this "prior" me? Are newborns and the yet-to-be-alive our prior selves?
Once again, you are describing a human being. Sooner or later we might have to be honest and relate what it actually is we're talking about.
They are instances, images and articulations of me functioning in different ways.
I am a complete being, so I am that which composes this being. The limbs are a part of me yes. Once they are removed, they are no longer.
Only the dead do not think.
I am not the majority of people. Why would one want to stop thinking and stop eating? What benefit is to gain from these vain desires?
I never denied this. I am not the one claiming I am without ego. I am claiming that there is no ego there to be without.
Once again I will afford you the benefit of the doubt. But the same things have been said by the mentally disturbed and charlatans alike.
AsherahoftheSea
reply to post by KellyPrettyBear
KPB, I know real evil exists, as I have encountered it. It will not change and it will not stop until it has achieved what it wants. You cannot fight it by submitting to the universe or giving it love. Love is but a weakness to it. It's either it or us.
***
i don't think you know what your talking about.