It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
St0rD
I strongly believe that in the beginning we were all one with the ultimate source of energy. The reason why we decided to separate can be interpreted and debated in a lot of ways.
Where I find my own personnal answer is in one important lesson life teaches us very quickly in life: the importance of appreciating what we have... because you know, we tend not to appreciate what we acquire and tend to desire what we don't possess.
So that lead me to start to believe that before the universe of matter came to birth, we were all perfection. Maybe we weren't really able to value the importance of what we had, because it was infinite and perfect. That might be one of the reason that matter decided to split and distance itselfs from the ultimate source. To go learn and remember how beautiful life and creation is.
But the main goal is to go back to this source.
KellyPrettyBear
reply to post by Serdgiam
A scientist would say that everything which has unfolded
is a result of initial conditions after the 'big bang' and
also throw in quantum fluctuations to throw in even
more randomness as well as the laws of thermodynamics
(entropy in this case) to 'wind everything down'.
Using that model, no decisions are made; just a continuing
dynamic process. No need to anthropomorphize matter..
Mystics and religious people would say all sorts of stuff..
nearly all of which would require anthropomorphizing
the the laws of nature.. and since humans aren't the
center of the universe, that would seem to be a poor
strategy.... it's very hard to speak credibly on this
subject, due to 'selection bias' and other logical
errors that we are all so prone to make.
All that said, I msyelf have a model that would answer
your question in less rigid terms than pure reductionist
materialism, mysticism or religion, but I don't share it.
Serdgiam
Would you mind clarifying how you feel that pertains to the OP?
akushla99
When it started to...mind...
Then things started to...matter...
Å99
Itisnowagain
akushla99
When it started to...mind...
Then things started to...matter...
Å99
Totally agree.
To mind is to matter.
akushla99
When it started to...mind...
Then things started to...matter...
Å99
Serdgiam
KellyPrettyBear
reply to post by Serdgiam
A scientist would say that everything which has unfolded
is a result of initial conditions after the 'big bang' and
also throw in quantum fluctuations to throw in even
more randomness as well as the laws of thermodynamics
(entropy in this case) to 'wind everything down'.
Using that model, no decisions are made; just a continuing
dynamic process. No need to anthropomorphize matter..
I am actually doing the reverse, though it is subtle. I am including ourselves as simply different forms of matter, since we are.
Mystics and religious people would say all sorts of stuff..
nearly all of which would require anthropomorphizing
the the laws of nature.. and since humans aren't the
center of the universe, that would seem to be a poor
strategy.... it's very hard to speak credibly on this
subject, due to 'selection bias' and other logical
errors that we are all so prone to make.
I am not seeking answers, but discussion. If you do not wish to share, then why mention anything at all? You tease!
I am not seeking answers, but discussion. If you do not wish to share, then why mention anything at all? You tease!
Serdgiam
akushla99
When it started to...mind...
Then things started to...matter...
Å99
If so, then when did that happen and what were the processes leading up to it?
Serdgiam
akushla99
When it started to...mind...
Then things started to...matter...
Å99
If so, then when did that happen and what were the processes leading up to it?
Serdgiam
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Perhaps I should have posted in the science forum to make the context a bit more clear..
Serdgiam
akushla99
When it started to...mind...
Then things started to...matter...
Å99
If so, then when did that happen and what were the processes leading up to it?
KellyPrettyBear
You are wise to include us as just 'different forms of matter',
because that is correct. Now in this case 'matter' means a
little more than a closed-minded materialist would think.
As a matter of fact, big tease that I am, I'll flat out say, that
when one understands the very topic you are discussing..
then a million other things suddenly fall into place and then
you can be a huge tease.
From my view.. providing some information and feedback,
but leaving some things unsaid and 'teasing' is a very valid
way to propel a convesation foreward, yes? It gets people
thinking "just what is that teasing asshole saying"? That
thinking which is caused is actually more valuable than
any information which may be provided.
But yes.. your initial post was pretty obscure.. perhaps
you can take another go at it.