ITCCS: Eyewitness to 1987 ritual say's “I Saw Joseph Ratzinger Murder Little Girl”

They claim Ratzinger was found guilty for crimes against humanity in common law court...

Soon after his historic resignation from office last February 11, Joseph Ratzinger was convicted of Crimes against Humanity on February 25, 2013 by the Brussels-based International Common Law Court of Justice, and a global citizens arrest warrant was issued against him. Since then, he has evaded arrest within Vatican City under a decree of the present Pope Francis.

Monday, October 28, 2013 The criminal prosecution of yet another Pope came closer to reality this month as Italian politicians agreed to work with the ITCCS in a common law court action against the papacy for its haboring of a wanted fugitive from justice: deposed Pope Benedict, Joseph Ratzinger. The agreement came after a new eyewitness confirmed the involvement of Ratzinger in a ritual child sacrifice in Holland in August of 1987. “I saw Joseph Ratzinger murder a little girl at a French chateau in the fall of 1987″ stated the witness, who was a regular participant in the cult ritual torture and killing of children.

itccs.org...
www.youtube.com...

ITCCS claim a group of Italian Politicians have agreed to work with them in confronting the Papacy....

“We are looking at revising if not abolishing our country’s Lateran Treaty with the Vatican, whose actions in harboring child rapists certainly meet the definition of a Transnational Criminal Organization under international law” stated a spokesman for one of the politicians.

They also claim that their web site has been under attack from the Vatican....

Paid operatives sabotaged ITCCS work in Holland and Ireland during that week, and on October 14, the main ITCCS website was destroyed by the same saboteurs. Political sources in Rome have revealed that these attacks were paid for and coordinated through the Office of the Vatican espionage agency known as the “Holy Alliance” or The Entity, and its affiliated “dirty ops” bureau, the Sodalitium Pianum, established in Rome in 1913. They also involved the agents of the Papal Nuncio to Holland, Archbishop Andre Dupuy, who made direct contact with two of the saboteurs, “Mel and Richard Ve”, and with the Archbishop of Dublin, Diarmuid Martin, who likewise paid bribes to disrupt ITCCS work in Ireland.

It will be very interesting to see how all of this pans out. The corruption inside the Vatican is obscene. Personally i think it is on it's last leg's, it's downfall seems inevitable and it wont be a pretty sight.

FYI:

The ITCCS is not a real organization. It's pretty much one guy: Kevin D. Annett in Canada.

Here's an ATS thread about it: Some Things to Know About ITCCS

The ITCCS has been agitating for the arrest of world leaders for charges of War Crimes, and many other such for awhile.
It's an opinion driven organization that essentially makes up sensationalist stories and claims regarding near any and every personality in a political position from The Queen of England, The Pope, Presidents Bush and Obama, as well as anyone and everyone else this little operation thinks or imagines should be visited with charges.

ITCCS is not a legally recognized organization and pretty much adds up to some guy in a basement foaming at the mouth in front of his computer.

ITCCS isn't shy about making things up, and blowing its horn for everyday people to serve out citizen arrest warrants over imaginary crimes.

One of these days some nutter that actually believes and takes stock in the ITCCS claims is going to get hurt.


EDIT: ATS Staff - Regardless the legitimacy or more appropriately the questionability of such with ITCCS, as prolific as Kevin D. Annett is in making these wild claims (and fooling ATS members into believing them as coming from real legal authority), I'm making formal request we have a separate forum for ITCCS (and similar organizations like Westboro) claims.

AliceBleachWhite
FYI:

The ITCCS is not a real organization. It's pretty much one guy: Kevin D. Annett in Canada.

Here's an ATS thread about it: Some Things to Know About ITCCS

The ITCCS has been agitating for the arrest of world leaders for charges of War Crimes, and many other such for awhile.
It's an opinion driven organization that essentially makes up sensationalist stories and claims regarding near any and every personality in a political position from The Queen of England, The Pope, Presidents Bush and Obama, as well as anyone and everyone else this little operation thinks or imagines should be visited with charges.

ITCCS is not a legally recognized organization and pretty much adds up to some guy in a basement foaming at the mouth in front of his computer.

ITCCS isn't shy about making things up, and blowing its horn for every day people to serve out citizen arrest warrants over imaginary crimes.

One of these days some nutter that actually believes and takes stock in the ITCCS claims is going to get hurt.

edit on 10/30/2013 by AliceBleachWhite because: (no reason given)

The op in that post also say's..........."I am not claiming to have all the answers... or know everything about the ITCCS and Kevin Annet. In fact, I have never heard of this guy until today".

So i think we can safely disregard that!

Did you watch the video? I find the woman credible, just my opinion of course, you are entitled to your own opinion also. And of course it isn't just one guy if you read the web site.
Why did the Pope stand down? Any ideas? It just seems so unusual there must be a good reason behind it don't you think?
Also i am prepared for the flak that is going to come with this post, that's fine. I just don't understand how people can defend this organization! If God is in you heart, that's great, it doesn't matter which religion to me but to defend the action's of the people in the Vatican, i find it very strange.

reply to post by AliceBleachWhite

It's an opinion driven organization that essentially makes up sensationalist stories and claims regarding near any and every personality in a political position from The Queen of England, The Pope, Presidents Bush and Obama, as well as anyone and everyone else this little operation thinks or imagines should be visited with charges.

I was waiting for the punchline there, is there really no one in that list above that you can think of that can be charged with a crime?? No one??
And believe me its not just an "opinion", imagination or sensationalism, its fact.

Peace, NRE.

ITCCS, isn't that the nutty group who convicts everyone they don't like in absentia in a court that no one recognizes, for publicity. Oh yeah.

I better shut up though, them and Ben Fulford with the White Dragon Ninja Army might come after me…

reply to post by NoRegretsEver


By no means am I making any defense against any accused by Kevin Annett.

I am, however, looking at the source of the claims.

Kevin Annett

Kevin Annett is a defrocked priest who had taken-up a second career as a con-artist/grifter. Annett has convinced a bunch of unwitting people that he is the saviour of Indigenous people everywhere, and the only person who is working on their behalf. This is not true- rather, he is using their cause for his own personal gain.

Kevin is most famous for his faking of the discovery of a ‘mass grave’ at the Six Nations Reserve in Brandford, Ontario. Apparently, he is pulling the same con at other reserves- one has to feel sorry for all of the people who he is building false hope for.

Testamonials against Kevin Annett

... he has been using survivors of the residential school system for his own purposes, and using their recorded testimonies to publish articles about them without their permission. I have seen enough untruths in Kevin Annett’s own E-Mail writings to indicate outright deception, or someone who is seriously out of reality. I have also seen evidence and heard reports of his controlling and domineering behavior towards Indians which is really another unacceptable form of abuse. I can also say, to the best of my knowledge of the Indian community in Vancouver, that he does not speak for any group nor does he have support from any organization or individuals since he has betrayed the trust which people had given him. In other words, he does not have credibility where it counts.

Enough looking around, and anyone interested can find information about his defrauding the First Nations peoples under the guise of helping them, and many others.

He's a grifter that gains your confidence through appealing to your own moral sense of injustices in the world.
It's really only a matter of time before he's doing time, either behind bars, or, under below ground after he's finished playing out one too many cons on people suddenly dawning to awareness how they've been played.

reply to post by AliceBleachWhite


I am in no way defending this man either, the difference here is that for everyone person that has spoke out, as I am sure 99% of ATS users have their favorite whistleblower/conspiracy theorist there is tons of dirt.

We get tangled up in who said what, I could care less, whats important is that stories are getting ignored because people are worried about who has the best track record... and if thats what people are looking for, then good luck.

Everyday we are scaring people that want to come out about horrific things, by either saying we will take their freedom, or we will destroy their name. Frankly, I would be happy to hear from someone who is willing to say something and has a spotty background, then someone who is squeaky clean, and not because squeaky clean is bad, but if your on the right track, then your reputation will be worse.

BTW, sorry if it seems like I am sticking up for this person, I just kills me to see things like this get over looked because someone is nuts.... were all nuts

Peace, NRE.

AliceBleachWhite
reply to post by NoRegretsEver

 

By no means am I making any defense against any accused by Kevin Annett.

I am, however, looking at the source of the claims.

Kevin Annett

Kevin Annett is a defrocked priest who had taken-up a second career as a con-artist/grifter. Annett has convinced a bunch of unwitting people that he is the saviour of Indigenous people everywhere, and the only person who is working on their behalf. This is not true- rather, he is using their cause for his own personal gain.

Kevin is most famous for his faking of the discovery of a ‘mass grave’ at the Six Nations Reserve in Brandford, Ontario. Apparently, he is pulling the same con at other reserves- one has to feel sorry for all of the people who he is building false hope for.

Testamonials against Kevin Annett

... he has been using survivors of the residential school system for his own purposes, and using their recorded testimonies to publish articles about them without their permission. I have seen enough untruths in Kevin Annett’s own E-Mail writings to indicate outright deception, or someone who is seriously out of reality. I have also seen evidence and heard reports of his controlling and domineering behavior towards Indians which is really another unacceptable form of abuse. I can also say, to the best of my knowledge of the Indian community in Vancouver, that he does not speak for any group nor does he have support from any organization or individuals since he has betrayed the trust which people had given him. In other words, he does not have credibility where it counts.

Enough looking around, and anyone interested can find information about his defrauding the First Nations peoples under the guise of helping them, and many others.

He's a grifter that gains your confidence through appealing to your own moral sense of injustices in the world.
It's really only a matter of time before he's doing time, either behind bars, or, under below ground after he's finished playing out one too many cons on people suddenly dawning to awareness how they've been played.

edit on 10/30/2013 by AliceBleachWhite because: (no reason given)

You could be right about him NoRegretsEver, i don't know. What it do know is this documentary..

www.youtube.com...


Winner: Best International Documentary at the 2006 Los Angeles Independent Film Festival.
Winner: Best Director for an International Documentary at the 2006 New York International Film Festival.
It seems truthful enough to me.

He maybe be a bit nuts or going through a smear campaign but sometimes the message can have truth's through out it. i.e. The documentary.

And of course he was defrocked for exposing the abominable treatment of the Native Americans in the Indian Residential schools. The Vatican must have thought, let's defrock and smear him and maybe the people will forget the atrocities! Well, i didn't. If he did what you said then he should be held accountable, absolutely, shoot the messenger if he deserves it but let's not forget the message!!!

reply to post by DrunkYogi

shoot the messenger if he deserves it but let's not forget the message!!!

Thanks, thats what I meant to say.

Peace, NRE.

reply to post by DrunkYogi


reply to post by NoRegretsEver


While this guy's 'Message' might be worthy of some notice, the nature of the message is the very basis of his con game.

Example: If for instance, the message was "Stop Rape", it's an easy cause to get behind. Thing is though, the vehicle and driver of the cause is entirely corrupt, taking advantage of and even abusing those supposedly being represented, and causing more harm than help.

In the First Nations Peoples case, he faked the discovery of a mass grave (that never existed. His Time and most importantly his money wasn't spent on heavy equipment digging holes that found nothing, but someone's was), and if I'm not mistaken, even made a film about it, exploiting First Nations Peoples interviews out of context, and laughed all the way to the bank.

While on the broader scale messages like Politician X Y Z, and World Leader 1 2 3, Public Figure So-in-So are "criminals", might be "TRUE" and deserving of the public ire, and attention, there's no real handle to hold, and ever where possibly so, contaminations by sorts like Kevin Annett not only exploit victims, but, may even jeopardize legitimate concerns and investigations by poisonous association, and funnelling funds and time into this guy's pockets that could be spent in real pursuit all the while statutes of limitations are ticking away too.

Further, any victim concerns might be poisoned from accepting assistance by, or talking to legitimate victims rights and aid associations after getting scammed by this guy which, in turn, could effectively silence a cause that could have gotten real attention.

Thus, regardless the righteousness of the 'message', giving this crook the face time and any popular attention that translates into false credibility supports his criminal exploitation of people more so than doing any actual good in respect for the message used as a smokescreen for his operation.

reply to post by DrunkYogi


I think there's FAR tooooooooooo much smoke for there to be nothing to such narratives . . . and . . . I agree, the personal narratives typically come across to me as earnest and honest.

Regardless . . .

Many Christians who study such things with an open and informed mind . . . realize

that

1. The script calls for a satanic world government to rule the world within a generation of Israel becoming a nation again [1948].

2. Satanic world leaders have NOT been playing nice rocking horse and piggy back games with children for decades . . . at least . . . not in various venues protected for their hideous satanic activities.

3. imho, the rest is so many details. Some specifics may or may not be true. The gist of the realities is that such stuff DOES go on . . . and with folks in the news on a more or less daily basis.

Just realize the end game context and realities and work back . . . if one has the stomach for it.

I usually don't . . . on this issue.

Thus, regardless the righteousness of the 'message', giving this crook the face time and any popular attention that translates into false credibility supports his criminal exploitation of people more so than doing any actual good in respect for the message used as a smokescreen for his operation.

reply to post by AliceBleachWhite


Wrong! The message is much more important. If he done wrong he done wrong, but two wrong's don't make a right. So let's forget him and concentrate on the Vatican's obscene fake religious pantomime that covers heinous crime's they have been committing for hundred's of years. Especially on the children of the World.

DrunkYogi

The op in that post also say's..........."I am not claiming to have all the answers...

"Hey...I dont have all the answers, Im just engaging in slanderous character assassination of a public figure without providing a shred of evidence. Just voicing my opinion! Just saying that the Pope rapes and murders little girls! Its free speech, innit?"

Skyfloating

DrunkYogi

The op in that post also say's..........."I am not claiming to have all the answers...

"Hey...I dont have all the answers, Im just engaging in slanderous character assassination of a public figure without providing a shred of evidence. Just voicing my opinion! Just saying that the Pope rapes and murders little girls! Its free speech, innit?"

Did you read the post, i said claims, three times! Yes it is free speech, if people disagree then they can add their free speech to the debate saying so!

www.dailymail.co.uk...


www.sott.net...

Victims of clerical sex abuse have reacted furiously to Pope Benedict's claim yesterday that paedophilia wasn't considered an "absolute evil" as recently as the 1970s. In his traditional Christmas address yesterday to cardinals and officials working in Rome, Pope Benedict XVI also claimed that child pornography was increasingly considered "normal" by society. "In the 1970s, paedophilia was theorised as something fully in conformity with man and even with children," the Pope said. "It was maintained - even within the realm of Catholic theology - that there is no such thing as evil in itself or good in itself. There is only a 'better than' and a 'worse than'. Nothing is good or bad in itself."

I guess pedophilia isn't so bad after all!!! Who the hell would make such a statement, seriously, i ask you? He's such a grand old guy, you just couldn't believe any of the rumors could you?

But outraged Dublin victim Andrew Madden last night insisted that child abuse was not considered normal in the company he kept. Mr Madden accused the Pope of not knowing that child pornography was the viewing of images of children being sexually abused, and should be named as such. He said: "That is not normal. I don't know what company the Pope has been keeping for the past 50 years." Pope Benedict also said sex tourism in the Third World was "threatening an entire generation".

Yeah! who's company has the Pope been keeping for the past 50yrs to consider this normal.

www.theguardian.com...

A letter written in 1985, when the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was the head of the Vatican's doctrinal unit, resists a request for the defrocking of an American priest with a record of molesting children, for the "good of the universal Church".

The good of the Universal Church!!!


How anyone can defend these abominations is beyond me, honestly, i despair!

reply to post by DrunkYogi


Get out of jail free card eh!

pope complicit child abuse say victims

www.theguardian.com...
www.independent.co.uk... -richard-dawkins-work-as-science-fiction-8839015.html
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Pope: Pedophilia Was “Fully In Conformity With Man And Even With Children”

thenewcivilrightsmovement.com...

He's such a nice old guy too. Who would ever believe such thing's? Fully in conformity etc, my God he's putting it right in front of people's eye's and they still refuse to believe! Shame on these people i say....Shame!!!

There is apparently a 3 hour testimony video but we've only seen the short version. She says and i quote - Prince Bernhard (husband of Dutch Queen Juliana) and Cardinal Alfrink (Utrecht, Netherlands) - so we will have to wait for the full version to objectively analyze her story about Ratzinger.

One more thing, the woman is flinching as if the guy beside her is administering small electric shocks. When i look at the dynamic in the video i see a handler, sorry. Maybe i am wrong.

These satanic abuse rings are nothing new here in the Netherlands and other EU countries. Prince Bernhard and castles in the Netherlands were mentioned before by other abuse victims. Books are written about it and a couple of documentary's exist already.

reply to post by BO XIAN


I agree Bo Xian, there's just too much happening for it all to be BS. Some people refuse to believe any information from any source regarding the subject. They can run and hide from the situation if they so wish but i will remind these people that while they are doing so, children are being hurt by members of the Catholic Church. This a verifiable fact! That's why i say SHAME on them, if you are intentional blind to the matter then you are in fact condoning them. Condoning pedophilia, absolutely disgusting!!!

DrunkYogi

You could be right about him NoRegretsEver, i don't know. What it do know is this documentary..

www.youtube.com...


Winner: Best International Documentary at the 2006 Los Angeles Independent Film Festival.
Winner: Best Director for an International Documentary at the 2006 New York International Film Festival.
It seems truthful enough to me.

I was a bit bored and decided to try and verify this info.

First off... Winner: Best International Documentary at the 2006 Los Angeles Independent Film Festival.

I actually couldn't find this festival at all. With a bit more searching I discovered...

Source
The LA Film Fest.

The festival began as the Los Angeles Independent Film Festival (LAIFF) in 1995. The LAIFF ran for six years, until it was absorbed into Film Independent in 2001. At its height, the LAIFF attracted 19,000 attendees. Today, the Los Angeles Film Festival attracts more than 90,000.

So, technically speaking, the "Los Angeles Independent Film Festival" only existed from '95-'01, not in 2006, but I figured I'd give him the benefit of the doubt and visit the LA Film Fest's website directly since the festival was absorbed in '01. Unfortunately, there's no mention of a category for "Best International Documentary" even existing in their 2006 archives. There's also no listing for Unrepentant in their 2006 festival film guide. hmmmm...

Well, I figured after that dead end I'd give the "Best Director for an International Documentary at the 2006 New York International Film Festival" a try, and to my surprise...

Source

Best Director (Documentary)- Louie Lawless for Unrepentent: Kevin Annett and Canada's Genocide

We have a winner!!! Or do we...

Along the search I found this little gem

Source

Controversy

The festival, which caters to independent filmakers, has struggled with public perceptions. It was criticized by The Village Voice in 1997, and IndieWire in 1999[4] for its open policy of accepting nearly every submission, as well as its $300 entry fee.[5] The Internet Movie Database accepted the festival for years[6] but, according to its website, NYIIFVF no longer meets its criteria for inclusion.

So it appears this Festival has a pretty open policy that... as long as you pay your film will play. Certainly not standard practice for credible film festivals; however, they did give Louie Lawless a Directorial award for the film which most who payed their fee can't claim.

I also verified at IMDB that...

And some specific non-qualifying events that don't fit the above categories:

New York International Independent Film and Video Festival: We accepted this event for a number of years, but have since become convinced that this does not meet our criteria for selectiveness.

So the prestige of these "awards", much like other claims by Annett, are dubious at best.

In the second quote in the op it says:

"The agreement came after a new eyewitness confirmed the involvement of Ratzinger in a ritual child sacrifice in Holland in August of 1987. “I saw Joseph Ratzinger murder a little girl at a French chateau in the fall of 1987″"

So which is it? Holland or France?

NoRegretsEver
reply to post by DrunkYogi

 

shoot the messenger if he deserves it but let's not forget the message!!!

Thanks, thats what I meant to say.

Peace, NRE.

However, if the message is completely made up, it is a false message. Just because some people want such accusations to be true, does not mean that they are true at all.