I think I know What Chemtrails are... and it's worse than you can imagine!

Korg Trinity

alienDNA

Korg Trinity
reply to post by DenyObfuscation

 

There is insufficient data to ascertain if those trails are chemtrails or persistent contrails. I also never said that the image was or was not chemtrails.

Could you show us ONE picture please, where there is SUFFICIENT data to ascertain that the picture show us a Chemtrail?

Just one will be enough.

Why not absorb this...

Korg.

Are you farmiliar with Chaff?

Please see this to understand how smart folks get duped into looking stupid.

Korg Trinity

alienDNA

Korg Trinity
reply to post by DenyObfuscation

 

There is insufficient data to ascertain if those trails are chemtrails or persistent contrails. I also never said that the image was or was not chemtrails.

Could you show us ONE picture please, where there is SUFFICIENT data to ascertain that the picture show us a Chemtrail?

Just one will be enough.

Why not absorb this...

Korg.

First the Snowden one and now this! Do you ever check your information?

reply to post by Korg Trinity


Okay, I see there is no point in further discussion with you.
The reason I say this is because you again, and again, and again, fail to realise it is not we who must prove that chemtrails doesnt exist.
That is practically impossible. Furthermore, the evidence burden lies not on us.
It is like asking someone to disprove pink unicorns. Its virtually impossible to do so.


It is you who must prove that they DO exist. And you seem to not grasp it, so therefore, it is zero point in further discussing this.

reply to post by Korg Trinity

There is insufficient data to ascertain if those trails are chemtrails or persistent contrails. I also never said that the image was or was not chemtrails.

Actually there isn't, but you just don't want to understand it.

That would be why the question was asked.

reply to post by network dude

Please see this to understand how smart folks get duped into looking stupid.

Shouldn't that be Duppel instead of duped.

reply to post by tsurfer2000h


Perhaps Korg is "absorbing" the information provided.

reply to post by alienDNA

It is like asking someone to disprove pink unicorns.

I may be wrong, but I think that has come up in this thread.

reply to post by network dude

Perhaps Korg is "absorbing" the information provided.

One could only hope so.

network dude
reply to post by tsurfer2000h

 

Perhaps Korg is "absorbing" the information provided.

It usually seems to wash off

reply to post by tsurfer2000h

Yes I know.
It is nearly impossible. To disprove something.
I could claim there is a tree growing right now from my computer monitor. Without you actually coming to my house to witness it, there is no way you can disprove it.
However I can easily prove it just by taking a picture of it.

Im not very good with analogies. But I think point comes across. Its not up to us to disprove chemtrails.
That would be virtually impossible to do! By simple logic alone, it cannot be done and doing it would require an immense amount of work by identifying EVERY SINGLE contrail out there, as just being contrails.

The burden lies on the chemtrailers. You must provide evidence or it doesnt exist. Simple as that.
And no, noone is denying the POSSIBILITY.

reply to post by Korg Trinity


No, it was a direct reply to a statement of mine that YOU quoted. You are being dishonest. We can see it throughout the thread. When confronted with something you said you wriggle and squirm and pretend you said something else. I am not playing your silly game any more

Korg Trinity

alienDNA

Korg Trinity
reply to post by DenyObfuscation

 

There is insufficient data to ascertain if those trails are chemtrails or persistent contrails. I also never said that the image was or was not chemtrails.

Could you show us ONE picture please, where there is SUFFICIENT data to ascertain that the picture show us a Chemtrail?

Just one will be enough.

Why not absorb this...

Korg.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

Oh well played sir.

reply to post by alienDNA

The burden lies on the chemtrailers. You must provide evidence or it doesnt exist. Simple as that.
And no, noone is denying the POSSIBILITY.

From your lips to deaf ears...chemtrail believers ears that is.

reply to post by Korg Trinity

Why not absorb this...

Ah yes, it was just about time for the Tankerenemy video...

This video shows your scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to show any evidence for chemtrails.

He is trolling us ;(

reply to post by alienDNA


I think it's been going from the start.

network dude
reply to post by alienDNA

 

I think it's been going from the start.

I mean come on... you reap what you sow!

Korg.

Korg Trinity

network dude
reply to post by alienDNA

 

I think it's been going from the start.

I mean come on... you reap what you sow!

Korg.

You reap what you sow?


Are you saying you believe posters who oppose this conspiracy are trolling and this was your revenge trolling?

Get outta here,

For a member of 3 years, maybe leave and clear your head if these are the games you're playing.

I cant speak for any other posters but I have a real concern/interest for/in this Chemtrail conspiracy not because its possible or not but because of the social impact it has on people minds, especially those that are convinced something is happening and it has a negative effect.

reply to post by InhaleExhale


amen

Korg Trinity

network dude
reply to post by alienDNA

 

I think it's been going from the start.

I mean come on... you reap what you sow!

Korg.

So you wasted all this time, bandwidth, and energy to troll people who don't believe in chemtrails?

Prove to me you are not a troll.