It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Blue Shift
tanka418
As far as we know at this point, life is extremely rare, and possibly a cosmic fluke, happening on Earth but nowhere else anywhere.
What's being learned about life is that it can exist and thrive almost anywhere; in super heated waster (volcanic vents), in arsenic environments (life doesn't have to be carbon based), in extreme cold, at the edge of space... Venus and Mars both currently have environments that can support life, as does a moon of Jupiter and Saturn. Life does not have to exist there now for the "life is ubiquitous" rule to apply. Further it is being discovered that planets are also ubiquitous, so it is save to presume that there is life at probably 4 or 6 location around every "K" through "B" class star over 1 billion years old. Advanced life on stars over around 3 billion.
This is 2013 man, ideas on this change with nearly every bit of new data, and that is almost daily.
John_Rodger_Cornman
Notice UFO/USOs don't give a sonic boom nor do they register with radar/sonar.
Good luck detecting a trans-dimensional spacecraft (within a space-time bubble maybe or in another dimension entirely) with conventional radar.
tanka418
reply to post by Harte
Here please go read.
I know there is a lot of material there, but, it will show you that there is nothing speculative about this. It is hard, real, contemporary science. Perhaps a bit novel for some, but real none the less.
On the other hand, current physics has no explanation for the existence of exactly four fundamental forces that is, there is a belief only about the existence of four fundamental interactions. The question therefore arises, are there any additional fundamental physical interactions? Perhaps it is classical physics and not quantum mechanics that is incomplete, i.e., there might exist additional long range interactions. This question was discussed and analyzed in more detail in several recent papers, for instance9, 14–16 .
For several years, novel physical ideas have been presented under the name Extended Heim Theory, (EHT) a by complementing spacetime with an internal eight-dimensional space H8 . No extra spatial dimensions exist. that is, spacetime is 3+1. Although these physical concepts of EHT were
laid out in previous publications, see for instance,9, 14–16 a concise presentation for the sake of understanding of the essential features will be given in this paper. Most important, EHT is postulating the existence of six fundamental forces. According to EHT, there should be three gravitational forces in combination with the known electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions. Beside Newtonian gravitation (graviton ng attractive, coupling constant GN), EHT requires the existence of two additional gravitational fields, termed gravitophoton interaction ngp both attractive and repulsive, which results from the conversion of electromagnetic energy into gravitational energy, and quintessence nq, (repulsive)9
tanka418If photons have no mass then how is it they are affected by gravity?
tanka418
If photons have no mass how can they be considered a particle?
tanka418Photons have mass, even if it is infinitely small. Logically no individual object can have infinite mass, regardless of velocity. And, of course; even the infinitely small can become infinitely large, if infinity large is possible.
1) While it's true that there is a belief that there are only 4 forces (actually, the belief is that there is one force,) this belief is evidenced based. That is, there exists no evidence for any other currently unknown (and unobserved) force.
Photons are massless, as are gluons.
Photons are traditionally said to be massless. This is a figure of speech that physicists use to describe something about how a photon's particle-like properties are described by the language of special relativity.
tanka418
reply to post by Harte
Here please go read.
I know there is a lot of material there, but, it will show you that there is nothing speculative about this. It is hard, real, contemporary science. Perhaps a bit novel for some, but real none the less.
This science uses Heim - Lorentz force to create propulsion...no reactions.
mbkennel
Heim theory is extremely speculative, so much so that almost nobody understands it.
It's rather intriguing for something so crazy, but it does tend to predict a zoo of unobserved particles.
cavtrooper7
Developing a drive is only 1/2 of the issue. What about navigation? It's great to have this epic ability to speed out into space but where are the hazards?
mbkennel
tanka418
reply to post by Harte
Here please go read.
I know there is a lot of material there, but, it will show you that there is nothing speculative about this. It is hard, real, contemporary science. Perhaps a bit novel for some, but real none the less.
This science uses Heim - Lorentz force to create propulsion...no reactions.
Heim theory is extremely speculative, so much so that almost nobody understands it.
It's rather intriguing for something so crazy, but it does tend to predict a zoo of unobserved particles.
Wirral Bagpuss
I think UFOs are a mixed bag of things
1. Black project man made craft made out of the ashes of the Nazi flying saucer programme
2. Reversed Engineered technology from crashed ET craft
3. ET spacecraft capable of warp speed using star trek type technology
4. Interdimensional craft piloted by ET or future humans or a mix of both
5. Ancient Indian Vinammu technology recreated from ancient texts.