It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jiggerj
I would never dislike someone over their religious beliefs. It's just frustrating that they are so willing to NOT hear the falseness of what even they are offering as proof.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by jiggerj
Sorry Jiggerj. I tend to agree with most of your posts, but when it comes to Padre Pio I have to disagree with you. The information on Padre Pio is modern, well sourced, and documented. He had the stigmata.
ignorant and self-mutilating psychopath And this is from a Friar. Why would he lie?
Controversies It is claimed that no more than Anecdotal evidence supports Pio’s alleged mystical abilities. Some of his bilocations are consistent with hallucinations and the supposed odor of sanctity was purported to be Eau de Cologne. He was never watched continually to ensure that chemicals like carbolic acid or iodine were not used to prevent wounds from healing, as has been claimed. Pio over many years wore fingerless gloves which concealed his wounds or prevented him having to tend to the wounds. Near his death Pio avoided covering his hands and there was no sign of injury.[15][16][17][unreliable source?] The founder of Milan's Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, friar, physician and psychologist Agostino Gemelli, who met Padre Pio once, for a few minutes, but was unable to examine his stigmata,[18] concluded Padre Pio was "an ignorant and self-mutilating psychopath who exploited people's credulity."
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by jiggerj
So the founder of a university meets Padre Pio for a few minutes ... fails to inspect Padre Pio's wounds or even get into an investigation of any kind ... he gets indignant and disgruntled and he starts calling Padre Pio names ... "Ignorant and self mutilating' .... :shk: That's hardly a scientific or complete study .. ya' know??
I've smelled the odor of sanctity a few times. It's a very strong smell of roses.
So it does happen.
Padre Pios wounds disappearing near his death is in line with other stigmatics and disfigured saints through the centuries. In the months before their death .. or right after death ... the wounds or disfigurements disappear. That's historically how it happens. I don't know why.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Why would this Friar, who is also a physician, only be allowed a few minutes time?
Could it be that Pio wouldn't let the doctor examine him?
Also, you are talking about the smell of roses. I thought the smell was supposed to be lilacs, but either way, why would this article claim the smell to be a perfume out of a bottle?
the wounds or disfigurements disappear. Isn't that convenient?
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by MamaJ
(Adam-Jesus-Man-You-Me-All-One) all around.
Aw, Mama, there was no Adam. Even the church is now stating this. The topic starts around 3:50 in this clip.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by MamaJ
Regardless of what we want to believe, there is only one truth. I'm not so sure we have found that truth yet...at least, not in its entirety. But we have plenty of time to work on it, right? Thousands and thousands of years.edit on 24-8-2013 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)
reply to post by FlyersFan
Lemme' ask you jiggerj ... why do you believe what you believe?
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by colbe
We're still friends I hope, colbe
Of course. I would never dislike someone over their religious beliefs. It's just frustrating that they are so willing to NOT hear the falseness of what even they are offering as proof. If you go to :50 of that clip you will hear how the woman admits to gaining sight BEFORE meeting Pio.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
P.S. It's a valid concern I suppose, but real and authentic unconditional love doesn't deal in fear or threats, so there's an obvious flaw in traditional "Christian" theology/doctrine...*snip*
*snip*
In truth there can be no real heaven including heaven on earth unless and until the very prospect of hell no matter how far removed, is utterly removed, because only then can we be motivated to realize true goodness and love for the sake of goodness and love itself, in all it's reward.
No good Christian therefore argues for hell, nor uses hell as a prod by which to bring people to Christ. It's not "Good News" if there's a catch, that unless you accept, you'll be damned and doomed, forever. That's absurd and pathetic, and God as infinite intelligence is quite well aware of the dilemma and if he hasn't already is in the process of working out a new system of governance which needn't compromise with sin and evil to deal with it appropriately, according to his unconquerable love.
*snip*
Originally posted by colbe
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by colbe
We're still friends I hope, colbe
Of course. I would never dislike someone over their religious beliefs. It's just frustrating that they are so willing to NOT hear the falseness of what even they are offering as proof. If you go to :50 of that clip you will hear how the woman admits to gaining sight BEFORE meeting Pio.
This proves God even more, another divine to add, He knew her intention and her Grandmother's intention before they even voiced it to Padre Pio. They were on the way to see Pio. God gave sight to woman without pupils. How is that possible? God can do anything. Believe jigger.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Just browsed a few religious threads and the religious sincerity of some of you is frightening.
Look, somehow you all cuddle up to the idea of a loving biblical god, beautiful angels, and a place in paradise just for little ol' you. Isn't that special.
Well, if you're going to embrace all the deliciously ooey-gooey stuff with such fervor and unyielding faith, then you HAVE to believe in the malignant horrors that awaits you with the same exact intensity.
If there is a heaven, then there's a hell; a hell with an evil entity so malicious, so malevolent, that he's just drooling at the chance of torturing you throughout all of eternity. Comparing your soul to your physical body, this Satan just can't wait to rape you for a few hundred thousand years. And, as he does this he will dig his claws in and rip your flesh right off your bones. He'll crunch on your fingers. He'll roast you over a searing fire. And then, he'll heal you so he can start all over again. He'll throw you in a dark lonely void for a million years, or until you go stark raving mad. He'll sever a vein in your neck and drink your blood while you are wide awake. He'll make you watch as he does the same gruesome things to your loved ones that also landed in hell. He will delight in your endless screams, screams that will fall on deaf ears from above. You will have no hope, no escape, no relief, no release.
Is THIS what you want to believe in???????? Are you completely out of your minds???????
Originally posted by honested3
reply to post by jiggerj
Thanks for the colorful description of what hell was there in your original post, all of which are from your imagination. Hell is the lack of God. I am not sure what your post is trying to say, other than to accept there is something good, there has to be something bad? Look around you, the way humans treat each other is already far worse than what you described or are capable of imagining.
Acknowledging God acknowledges that you are in need of saving. If I am understanding your post correctly, then I could stipulate the follow: You believe that mankind is good? Well you are deranged because it means you believe that mankind is also bad? No, it just means you can see the difference between good and evil, and choose the good.
Originally posted by jiggerj
If there is a heaven, then there's a hell;
Is THIS what you want to believe in???????? Are you completely out of your minds???????