It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
Its simple really. Reduce the crop yields, reduce the amount of food and you increase the prices. The rest follows in a logical order. People who in many cases live on less than $2 a day would be harmed badly. Imagine what even a 25% rise in food prices would do to the significant part of the world that lives on that much.
Originally posted by AlphaHawk
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
Why do you feel the need to be so rude in your reply?
I have an education, that's how I know that food crops have been manipulated and changed to fit our needs.
And how our methods have changed as our knowledge and technology change.
GM is the next logical step really.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
There's an interesting blog here:
blogs.discovermagazine.com...
with the rather arresting title of "Why Organic Advocates Should Love GMOs."
I was reluctant to post this because it seems to be outside the bounds set for this topic. Maybe it would be best f you just looked at it and commented somewhere else. I'm suggesting that only to preserve covertpanther's feelings.
Originally posted by Superhans
All for GMOs
One day people will look back and laugh about how many people were afraid of the new technology. Just like the masses are often frightened by anything new. But before that this organic/eco/green fad will fade and people will stop caring.edit on 8-8-2013 by Superhans because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by calstorm
Originally posted by Superhans
All for GMOs
One day people will look back and laugh about how many people were afraid of the new technology. Just like the masses are often frightened by anything new. But before that this organic/eco/green fad will fade and people will stop caring.edit on 8-8-2013 by Superhans because: (no reason given)
No, I am not afraid of something new. I am afraid of the facts.
As far as organic goes, I am severely affected by pesticides and it is happening to more and more people, so I do not believe it is a passing fad.
What utter nonsense! Stop distorting the facts. Organic farms use NATURAL methods to control pests. Monsanto's Poisons are NOT natural.
Originally posted by Superhans
You are mixing up issues here, organic farming uses pesticides too
Yet more nonsense! I you knew what you were talking about you'd know that those who choose organic food are NOT driven by fashion, they are driven by FEAR of whats in the non organic food.
Originally posted by Superhans
And it is a passing fad,claiming to be deeply effected by food and being more organic than thou is just fashionable right now.
What utter nonsense! Stop distorting the facts. Organic farms use NATURAL methods to control pests. Monsanto's Poisons are NOT natural.
Yet more nonsense! I you knew what you were talking about you'd know that those who choose organic food are NOT driven by fashion, they are driven by FEAR of whats in the non organic food.
Research Confirms Organic Farming Produces Higher Yields
But a spate of new research has shown that organic farming actually yields better results than modern techniques when evaluated more holistically. A series of peer-reviewed papers published by the international journal, Nature, showed that organic methods for growing rice, corn and wheat all produced significantly higher yields—and at less the cost—than monoculture farms. And research at England’s Essex University has shown that farmers in India, Kenya, Brazil, Guatemala and Honduras have doubled or tripled their yields by switching to organic agriculture. Cuban farmers, who cannot access fertilizers and pesticides due to the U.S. embargo, have also realized greater yields by taking up organic farming.
Originally posted by Superhans
You should really look that up before you continue to come off as uneducated. Organic farmers use chemicals and pesticides on their crops...
www.ocf.berkeley.edu...
The reason for that is simple. Here in the UK, and just like in the USA, those who make the laws changed them!
Genuine organic farms DO NOT USE chemicals!
Since the laws have changed farmers are now allowed to use certain products and still be allowed to call there produce organic.
Those of us who take it seriously do not buy from those farms!
What we have now is a society full of people who are so confused they just dont understand what is happening to them. In the UK shops we now see products on the shelves that boast "Contains organic ..whatever..".
Those of us who understand whats going on would not touch that product. To boast that it has one ingredient thats organic is rediculous because the rest of it is NOT organic. The people who buy those products are the people YOU claim are driven by fashion. It does not include me or the many tens of millions of other people who buy GENUINE oganic food.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
reply to post by groingrinder
Link
Research Confirms Organic Farming Produces Higher Yields
But a spate of new research has shown that organic farming actually yields better results than modern techniques when evaluated more holistically. A series of peer-reviewed papers published by the international journal, Nature, showed that organic methods for growing rice, corn and wheat all produced significantly higher yields—and at less the cost—than monoculture farms. And research at England’s Essex University has shown that farmers in India, Kenya, Brazil, Guatemala and Honduras have doubled or tripled their yields by switching to organic agriculture. Cuban farmers, who cannot access fertilizers and pesticides due to the U.S. embargo, have also realized greater yields by taking up organic farming.