It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Last August, former Marine Brandon Raub was arrested by the Secret Service and FBI, taken into custody and placed in a psychiatric institution where he was told he would be forced to take medication which he did not want. He was freed approximately one week later after a federal judge reviewed his detention and found no probable cause by which to hold him. Raub's plight was taken up by The Rutherford Institute, which is suing the government on Raub's behalf for an unspecified amount. In a May 22, 2013 press release, Rutherford stated:
The complaint, filed in federal court in Richmond, alleges that Raub's seizure and detention were the result of a federal government program code-named "Operation Vigilant Eagle" that involves the systematic surveillance of military veterans who express views critical of the government. Institute attorneys allege that the attempt to label Raub as "mentally ill" and his involuntary commitment was a pretext designed to silence Raub's speech critical of the government and that the defendants violated Raub's rights under the First and Fourth Amendments.
Following Raub's highly-publicized case, Rutherford revealed that hundreds of other military veterans had contacted them to relate similar stories of government intimidation and people "disappearing." Rutherford Institute President John Whitehead stated that "Brandon Raub's case exposed the seedy underbelly of a governmental system that is targeting military veterans for expressing their discontent over America's rapid transition to a police state."
Two days before announcing the civil rights lawsuit, Whitehead expounded on Operation Vigilant Eagle, which was launched by the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice and the FBI to observe "veterans" for alleged signs of "extremism" and "oppositional defiance disorder (ODD)." Whitehead also wrote:
www.ppsimmons.blogspot.com...
That the government is using the charge of mental illness as the means by which to immobilize (and disarm) these veterans is diabolically brilliant. With one stroke of a magistrate's pen, these service men are being declared mentally ill, locked away against their will, and stripped of their constitutional rights. Make no mistake, these returning veterans are being positioned as enemy number one.
agist [əˈdʒɪst] vb (tr) Law 1. (Law) to care for and feed (cattle or horses) for payment 2. (Law) to assess and charge (land or its owner) with a public burden, such as a tax [from Old French agister, from gister to lodge, ultimately from Latin jacēre to lie down]
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by JBA2848
that's odd
Originally posted by TheMagus
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by JBA2848
that's odd
The error isn't yours
you used the title given by your source
perhaps the nitpickers should contact your source and inform it of the error
instead of posting off topic comments/nitpicking that fail to address and "debunk" the OP thus allowing the sheeple to go back to their mindless consuming while the nation and world crashes and burns?
i hear the sucking of koolaid slurpees makes you mindlessly parrot whatever BS the government and it's agents [known pathological liars, murderers, and thieves] make up, or print out on official stationary.
something you might want to keep in mind as you deal with replies on this thread.
Originally posted by Dero
Title is misleading.
Originally posted by groingrinder
Why go after imaginary veteran terrorists? Why do they not go after the REAL DOMESTIC TERRORISTS, street gangs?
Originally posted by groingrinder
Why go after imaginary veteran terrorists? Why do they not go after the REAL DOMESTIC TERRORISTS, street gangs?
Originally posted by ANNED
Originally posted by groingrinder
Why go after imaginary veteran terrorists? Why do they not go after the REAL DOMESTIC TERRORISTS, street gangs?
Most street gangs are black or hispanic.
Going after street gangs as domestic terrorist would be racist as per the black and hispanic community leaders.