It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At the time Big Ear recorded the radio signal that later became known as the "Wow!" signal ... there was no audio recording equipment attached to the output of that radio telescope. Hence, it is impossible to provide an audio tape of that signal.
Since we obtained one data point per channel every 12 seconds (10 seconds for observing plus 2 seconds for analysis and printout), any variation in the signal more frequently than once every 12 seconds could not be detected. The average value of the signal was almost perfectly constant over the total time of 72 seconds that it was in our beam
Originally posted by shiman
The software I used is very outdated, built originally for Windows 98, called Spectrogram 16. If anybody knows newer software that allows for higher resolution capture, then I could probably convert that waveform back into sound In my free time.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by jhn7537
Threads like this are so much fun... Just an interesting topic overall. Going back to the WOW signal and how its never been found again since, it really makes you wonder what's out there. I also believe that the reason why we've never found it again is because we found a needle in a haystack once, now we're trying to find that same needle again in the vastness that is space... I would bet good money on that signal being terrestrial, but I also WANT to believe, so its definitely easier to reach towards such extremes like that.
Originally posted by jhn7537
Threads like this are so much fun... Just an interesting topic overall. Going back to the WOW signal and how its never been found again since, it really makes you wonder what's out there. I also believe that the reason why we've never found it again is because we found a needle in a haystack once, now we're trying to find that same needle again in the vastness that is space... I would bet good money on that signal being terrestrial, but I also WANT to believe, so its definitely easier to reach towards such extremes like that.
Interstellar scintillation of a weaker continuous signal—similar in effect to atmospheric twinkling—could be an explanation, but that would not exclude the possibility of the signal's being artificial in origin. But even the significantly more sensitive Very Large Array could not detect the signal, and the probability that a signal below the Very Large Array level could be detected by the Big Ear due to interstellar scintillation is low.
Other speculations include a rotating lighthouse-like source, a signal sweeping in frequency, or a one-time burst.Ehman has voiced doubts that the signal was of intelligent extraterrestrial origin: "We should have seen it again when we looked for it 50 times. Something suggests it was an Earth-sourced signal that simply got reflected off a piece of space debris."
He later recanted his skepticism somewhat, after further research showed an Earth-borne signal to be very unlikely, given the requirements of a space-borne reflector being bound to certain unrealistic requirements to sufficiently explain the signal. Also, the 1420 MHz signal is problematic in itself in that it is "protected spectrum": bandwidth reserved for astronomical purposes in which terrestrial transmitters are forbidden to transmit. In his most recent writings, Ehman resists "drawing vast conclusions from half-vast data"—acknowledging the possibility that the source may have been military or otherwise a product of Earth-bound humans.
Scientists say that if the signal came from extraterrestrials, they are likely an extremely advanced civilization, as the signal would have required a 2.2-gigawatt transmitter, vastly more powerful than any on Earth.