+90 more
posted on Jun, 17 2013 @ 05:01 AM
While sifting through old maps of the Viking orbiter missions on Google Mars, I came across something that got me a bit confused. It's the
colorization and shading of the imagery that got me thinking.
Actually, I just wanted to see what certain areas look like on the Viking maps. But then I noticed the rather clear difference between dark surface
features and the lighter ones. While rotating the globe for a while, some of these extensive dark-areas somehow reminded me of something very
familiar:
(Click here for a bigger version of the above image)
(Click here for a bigger version of the above image)
I hope you see what I'm up to. The first thing I thought was: this cannot be, that's complete BS and it would be ridiculous to assume that the rough
resemblance is more than Pareidolia, more than a random similarity or sheer coincidence ... and probably there's a technical reason for some areas to
look darker than they would be in real Mars coloring, but I'm clearly not an expert on that matter.
Here's a projected map of the Viking imagery (rotated by 180°, slightly increased contrast):
(Click here for a big version of the above image)
I'm also posting this, because it reminded me of
this thread by another ATS member
some time ago which explores the possibility of the planets in our solar system being representations of one and the same celestial body at different
stages of evolution, in different dimensions and eras. I'm fully aware that this might sound stupid and would require making truly absurd assumptions
about things like planet size, angular inclinations, space-time etc., but I thought I'd still post this to check if anybody else sees what I see.
Given the lack of facts & evidence as well as my purely
morphological interpretation, I think this is the right forum to discuss something as
highly speculative as this ... and apologies (in advance) if this should be too much of a stretch for all of us, I'd be happy to put this absurd idea
to rest as quickly as possible!