It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by starwarsisreal
reply to post by Dianec
I am however more afraid of we humans invading an alien world in the name of spreading 'democracy' like what we did in Iraq and Afghanistan. Since we humans can advance at a rapid pace it won't be long before such a scenario happen.
Originally posted by Dianec
The part that gets me in this link is how disclosing is compared to telling a child about Santa Clause and it is necessary so that we can insure our survival.
I'm not a SETI or biblical scholar. All of this is just exploring on my part.
Originally posted by Dianec
I could not find another thread on this but if one exists please just delete this. Thank you.
There has been a lot of discussion of disclosures of extraterrestrial intelligent life not only existing but visiting earth. I asked myself, "so what…what would this truly change?"
Knowing that there is life "out there" might not make a big difference. What would make a difference is acknowledging this on a global scale; that intelligent beings have and are visiting us. This could create the perfect scenario for a one world system. I am sure this possibility would become more probable when crop circles begin to be taken seriously (as messages), or as more people capture images of them. Finally governments would pay attention instead of dismissing the signs right in front of them.
*Nations will become one. There will not longer be a need for us and them on a National level. It will be an us or them on a global scale. When proof we are being visited is firmly proven it will only be a matter of time before the structure of the world governments change.
Neither Daniel or Revelations speaks precisely of a one world order but rather paint a picture that shows us some sort of leader (an antichrist), will exist and run things. We are so accustomed to having one person being the spokesperson I can't see this part changing with a one world government. With being a spokesperson comes power as has been my view of leaders even in a democracy.
Religious leaders would revisit their own interpretations of religious texts. Regardless of their beliefs, I believe that similarities will finally be accentuated and differences will take a back seat. We may be asked to unite in this one belief in order to be as one. Governments might see a need to reign in what would happen on an individual level to values and morals. Whatever this new one belief system is would be created by those in charge instead of those who receive the actual wisdom from God and therefore would be considered false.
Certainly a one world system based on such knowledge of "us and them" would have consequences of a one world currency, a sharing of resources that are divided equally, and who knows what else.
The process of disclosure is accelerating as people demand to have evidence heard and governments share what they know. Countries that have moved to disclosure (or were in process of this as of 2011) are included in the link below
www.educatinghumanity.com...
The part that gets me in this link is how disclosing is compared to telling a child about Santa Clause and it is necessary so that we can insure our survival.
www.huffingtonpost.com...
I'm not a SETI or biblical scholar. All of this is just exploring on my part.