j.f.k. went on his merry way!

The events in Dealey Plaza were a Psy-Op

The ‘shots’ and JFK’s ‘headwound’ were simulated, the purpose was to create an immense MYTH in plain sight.

The ‘Proof’ has always been with us in the form of the Zapruder Film. 29 seconds long, 500 frames at 16 frames per second. We have 2 “Complete” versions here. A completely Stabilized, 720/1040 High Definition, 3D Version. And an ‘Enhanced’ completely Stabilized (1) Frame Per Second Version.
.........

The Short Version:

JFK had a flesh colored explosive ‘dye-pack’ type device attached to the right side of his face and the top of his head. It also covered at least his right eye with the same flesh colored material. The controls for the device were located under his chin or neck-tie area.

But since he was blind in at least his his right eye, (the left eye and side of his face are never shown after they drive past the sign. That could of been protected too.) due to the flesh colored protection, he might have problems setting off the device.

truedemocracyparty.net... batman-shooting/
please click the link for accompanying visuals.



(taken from the link below).

i know many will have difficulties with this one, but remember that there is no going back.
we are the innocent. we are the manipulated. we are the victims. disregard them all
because they messed so flippantly with our emotions, our lives and the lives of our children.

but by hating we only hurt ourselves. best is to forgive, but not to forget.
never, ever forget.

here the hoax is fleshed out completely and leaves absolutely no doubt.
The J.F.K. 'Murder Was a Staged/Hoaxed Event

this hoax was the prequel to the 9/11 hoax with most of the same players
intricately involved.
www.cluesforum.info

we finally see the reason for all the added conspiracy junk.
it is to disguise the fake heart of all these matters.

it is time now friends. it will continue for as long as we allow it.
choose freedom, if not for ourselves, then for our beautiful children.

i know there will be much resistance to this one, but it won't make it any less true.

E Howard Hunt of watergate fame
confessed on his deathbed to being involved and is there at the plaza on film apparantly dressed as a bumb while this takes place ( standard false flag alphabet invlvement )...of course we know that LHO was a patsy
(also standard FF )
sandf for curiosity sake anyhow

I look forward to seeing how this thread works itself out

reply to post by OutonaLimb


I don't know about white cords or face-exploding devices,

seems to complicated.

The Gif in your link does look like she fired a small gun from under his chin,

then got rid of it quick and her hands were back on his shoulder and arm.



No flinching, nothing. Cool as ice.

One of the things I can't buy into on this story is the supposed red liquid sprayed on the man in the front passenger seats back, so as to allegedly "fake" an injury. I honestly don't think this would look convincing enough to the naked eye (albeit the lack of evidence there is around these days) to constitute a real looking injury. I think it would be easy to spot from a mile off.

Just my thoughts...

He's dead Jim.

Originally posted by Theflyingweldsman
reply to post by OutonaLimb

 

I don't know about white cords or face-exploding devices,

seems to complicated.

The Gif in your link does look like she fired a small gun from under his chin,

then got rid of it quick and her hands were back on his shoulder and arm.

No flinching, nothing. Cool as ice.

edit on 3/5/2013 by Theflyingweldsman because: there is a reason for everything

you can see the squib peeling up his face. it is a hollywood style special effect that needs
to be activated close up. jackie was the activator. she was cool as ice, not because she
was mind controlled, but because she knew exactly the script that was to be followed.
they are actors, the lot of them.
the 'jackie shot jfk' is just more of the conspiracy junk always thrown into the mix of
these faked events.
they encourage any and all conspiracy pathways, so long as the essential faked heart
of matters (and the fact that no-one dies) is never considered.

Go watch another movie.

You have no idea how things were that day.

The pain.

Some of us still desire answers to this day.

But answers that make sense.

Originally posted by Danbones
E Howard Hunt of watergate fame
confessed on his deathbed to being involved and is there at the plaza on film apparantly dressed as a bumb while this takes place ( standard false flag alphabet invlvement )...of course we know that LHO was a patsy
(also standard FF )
sandf for curiosity sake anyhow

I look forward to seeing how this thread works itself out

it is all theatre. watergate was not what it was reported and understood to have been.
hunt was playing a role, as was oswald (whose death was also clearly staged).
anything and everything regarding the (official and official conspiracy) narratives
is suspect and needs to be viewed with your fakery goggles held firmly in place
around your brain.

see this for what it is and then take another look at 9/11. (or vice versa).

fakery fakery everywhere
and we lap it up.

Originally posted by fairguy
One of the things I can't buy into on this story is the supposed red liquid sprayed on the man in the front passenger seats back, so as to allegedly "fake" an injury. I honestly don't think this would look convincing enough to the naked eye (albeit the lack of evidence there is around these days) to constitute a real looking injury. I think it would be easy to spot from a mile off.

Just my thoughts...

since it was all theatre, some effects are more convincing that others. i am sure
that on the day it sufficed. also notice that the areas in and around where the
'shootings' occurred were very sparcely occupied by spectators, most of whom
were probably insiders with pre-scripted testimonies waiting to be delivered.

Originally posted by Xeven
He's dead Jim.

it's worse than that...he lives.

Originally posted by OutonaLimb

Originally posted by fairguy
One of the things I can't buy into on this story is the supposed red liquid sprayed on the man in the front passenger seats back, so as to allegedly "fake" an injury. I honestly don't think this would look convincing enough to the naked eye (albeit the lack of evidence there is around these days) to constitute a real looking injury. I think it would be easy to spot from a mile off.

Just my thoughts...

since it was all theatre, some effects are more convincing that others. i am sure
that on the day it sufficed. also notice that the areas in and around where the
'shootings' occurred were very sparcely occupied by spectators, most of whom
were probably insiders with pre-scripted testimonies waiting to be delivered.

But even if one effect was as unconvincing as this one sounds, surely that could easily blow the lid off the whole thing?
Would they take such a risk with something so easy to spot when trying to fake the death of the President of the United States?

I really can't imagine why...

Originally posted by SIEGE
Go watch another movie.

You have no idea how things were that day.

The pain.

Some of us still desire answers to this day.

But answers that make sense.

you are the one who has been watching a movie for all these years (just like 9/11!)

i suggest you evaluate the conclusive evidence presented in the links in the OP
you can see the squib rolling up his cheek as jackie activates it, for bobs sake.


i know it is hard but is it too hard to accept that your pain was in vain,
or that you and indeed the world were had by insider elite con merchants?
j.f.k. was never who he was reported to be. he was an actor placed into a role.
no more, no less.

or would you still really rather believe that so many government agencies and personnel
colluded and conspired together to kill the 'most important man in the world'?
(i assume you don't go along with the oswald killed jfk 'truthlayer'.)

impossible, i tell thee!

i am sorry for the internal conflict my friend, but the conclusions are inescapable
when all the evidence is examined.

reply to post by OutonaLimb


Ok, I never heard of the "Jackie shot John" theory.

Just saying what I see.

The "hollywood effects" theory is not much better, IMHO.

Interesting stuff though.

Tfw.

why not just fake a heart attack in the comfort of your living arrangements.
why fake something in public and be court doing it if all didn't go to plan?

Originally posted by fairguy

Originally posted by OutonaLimb

Originally posted by fairguy
One of the things I can't buy into on this story is the supposed red liquid sprayed on the man in the front passenger seats back, so as to allegedly "fake" an injury. I honestly don't think this would look convincing enough to the naked eye (albeit the lack of evidence there is around these days) to constitute a real looking injury. I think it would be easy to spot from a mile off.

Just my thoughts...

since it was all theatre, some effects are more convincing that others. i am sure
that on the day it sufficed. also notice that the areas in and around where the
'shootings' occurred were very sparcely occupied by spectators, most of whom
were probably insiders with pre-scripted testimonies waiting to be delivered.

But even if one effect was as unconvincing as this one sounds, surely that could easily blow the lid off the whole thing?
Would they take such a risk with something so easy to spot when trying to fake the death of the President of the United States?

I really can't imagine why...

the ink was sprayed from the back. take a look at how many people are
behind connollys wife on the green. very few indeed, and on the day she herself
would have been obstructing the view of most. the zapruder film wasn't released
'till over 10 years later, obviously long before the internet, where investigators can
now peruse the footage at their leisure. even now almost all assassination researchers
refuse to consider fakery so anyone broaching the issue is quickly shouted
down and drowned out. (are we foolish enough to believe that no 'researchers'
have been put in place to push some aspects over others for all the enquiring
conspiracy minded people out there to follow and traipse after?) (think 9/11!))

even now it is clear as day that kennedy is wearing a squib on and around his
cheek, yet how many will still call me loopers for pointing out the blatantly obvious?
and is the lid blown off the whole thing yet?

i have other thoughts on the apparent sloppiness of it all, and why this fakery
possibility (certainty) is being addressed more and more now.

Originally posted by Theflyingweldsman
reply to post by OutonaLimb

 

Ok, I never heard of the "Jackie shot John" theory.

Just saying what I see.

The "hollywood effects" theory is not much better, IMHO.

Interesting stuff though.

Tfw.

friend, go through the links i posted to prove to yourself that fakery is the case.
if you are interested enough that is. (i was and i'm not even american).

here is an index for thread for your convenience.
letsrollforums.com....

learn how not only was jfk's death faked, but also was lee harvey oswalds and
mary pinchott meyers (jfk's reported lover).

it all connects and fakery connects it all. next jump to 9/11.
not such a big jump after this.

i see the thread has been moved to skunkworks.

oh well, just shows how language has been twisted and turned around
when proven becomes highly speculative. it is similar to any thread talking of (proven)
media fakery with 9/11 being dumped into the hoax bin. oh well.

Originally posted by amraks
why not just fake a heart attack in the comfort of your living arrangements.
why fake something in public and be court doing it if all didn't go to plan?

there is a greater agenda at play here. this was part of a social engineering
programme. the beatles were introduced into america early 1964 to console
the broken hearts of the american public.

the roman empire is alive and kicking, for whom the U.S. army became the bulldogs
for after 1913. after the war is won, the bulldogs need to be put down.

is the war won yet? i would say almost!

Originally posted by OutonaLimb

Originally posted by amraks
why not just fake a heart attack in the comfort of your living arrangements.
why fake something in public and be court doing it if all didn't go to plan?

the beatles were introduced into america early 1964 to console
the broken hearts of the american public.

I'm sorry but I strongly disagree with this....
I think this is one of the most idiotic things I have ever read regarding the death of JFK.
Sorry.

Right, so, if i buy into this crock and i believe he's not dead...where did he go...and why.

Was it so Jackie could claim the insurance...??

Does he share an apartment with Jimmy hoffa....??

Was it so he could go to Thailand and have a sex change...??

Or did someone BLOW HIS BRAINS OUT...

Ockams razor..when you here the clip clop of horses hooves, why look for a donkey????

reply to post by amraks


You don't kill the king in his bedchamber. You wait until the king enters the court and then you stab him in the back, where everyone can see him die. So that everyone will see and know and then go spread the word.

As far as this theory goes, it's terribly interesting and I do believe it is the first time I've heard it. I had heard of Jackie pulling the trigger though. As far as I am concerned, she was one of the only people who truly knew what happened that day, but I don't feel like she ever really told any of it. Although, I doubt I would want to speak of such an event had I been her. It's just at every turn there are more questions then answers. Like why did she crawl onto the trunk of the car????

I always thought that JFK's death was a part of the cleansing or purification of the 1960's wherein every actual leader that America had was murdered. JFK, Bobby Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr, Malcolm X, and more that I'm forgetting. I assumed that these people needed to die in order for TPTB to enact/continue their plans. It is possible that JFK was already involved though. It is also possible that the man who died in that car was Kennedy's body double.

To clarify what I meant by the king/bedchamber/court thing. I don't think they were counting on the Zapruder film existence. The only evidence that they meant to leave for the people in Dealey Plaza was eye witness testimony. The wanted everyone to see a head explode and then go talk on the news about it. It was meant to be public, I just don't think the Zapruder film was meant to exist.

Kennedy was executed in public, for all to see, I've always been interested in the fact that Oswald was executed in exactly the same public manner.

And to whomever said that being there allows you to have a different perspective or longing for the truth. Hogwash to that. I was born 20 years after this all went down. The only presidents I've seen have been puppets and corporate mouthpieces. I think everyone born after Kennedy's assassination looks back on that day and knows that he was the last real leader this country had.