The impeachment of obama could gain some ground

Well in the real world you would need to have real charges against a President and not the fantasy charges that can survive the light of day or reality that are so popular here. If you are using the word socialist, communist, facist, NWO, police state, UN, Muslim, Kenyan, nazi, welfare state, gun grabber, CIA plant, illuminate, lizard people, aliens, mind control, clone, UN, satanists, tyrant or anything else along those lines then your charges are only valid in fantasy land. Obama, unless he does something worth impeachment will serve out his Presidency and someone esle will run and win in 2016. Then we will have yet another impeachment thread about that President accusing him of all the above once again. And so the cycle will continue.

reply to post by MrSpad


Only a blind man recognizes the power of being told SHHHHHHHHSH!

If bush&cheney who allowed or participated in killing 3000 people on 9-11-2001 could not or would not be impeached then why should obama be impeached? Not saying obama is perfect, but compared to bush he certainly is.

If romney was president this nation would have been far worse imho. The things I disagree with obama and the democrats are rather minor compared to the things I disagree with the republicans. Still I don't plan on voting democrat or republican for the forseable future.

One person that DEFINITELY should be impeached from this administration was eric "the dick" holder. He was responsible for sending arms to the drug cartels in mexico and is trying to cover-up everything. Truckloads of ak-47s and ammo shipped to them.

I also disagree with their severe gun banning agenda. I am for mild gun control, nothing remotely resembling what this administration had in plan. I am also against widespread drone warfare and shrinking the MIC as much as necessary to balance the budget.

reply to post by mactheaxe


Go visit the Bush library, maybe it will help all the confederates realize the south lost.

reply to post by MrSpad


welp! i think you have pretty much hit the nail on the head i salute you.

reply to post by mactheaxe


Lyndon Larouche is as crazy as crazy can be. I honestly cannot believe anyone with a brain would take him seriously for longer than a nanosecond. Just spend 2 minutes and search his name on you tube. He believes the most outrageous and absurd crap imaginable. I cannot believe anyone made a thread about this guy or that anyone would even consider him even remotely credible. Shows what desperation can do to someone. He is a cult leader.

He was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment in 1988 for conspiracy to commit mail fraud and tax code violations, and was released in 1994 on parole. Ramsey Clark, who was LaRouche's chief appellate attorney and a former U.S. Attorney General, said that the prosecution was politically motivated, and that LaRouche was denied a fair trial.[2] The Court of Appeals unanimously rejected the appeal.[3]

en.m.wikipedia.org...


The fact anyone would take him seriously has made me laugh out loud for the first time today.

The publications included Executive Intelligence Review, founded in 1974 and known for its conspiracy theories, alleging that Queen Elizabeth II is the head of an international drug-smuggling cartel, and that the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing was part of a British attempt to take over the United States.[20

More of Larouche genius at work. I could go on and on with his just totally crazy and off the wall ideas

Douglas Foster wrote in Mother Jones in 1982 that the briefings consisted of disinformation, "hate-filled" material about enemies, phony letters, intimidation, fake newspaper articles, and dirty tricks campaigns. Opponents were accused of being gay or Nazis, or were linked to murders, which the movement called "psywar techniques."[24]

If you think the impeachment of Obama will pick up steam based off anything this clown says I do have a bridge to sell you at a reasonable rate.


To say he was paranoid is an understatement. He is dangerously paranoid.

It'd only happen because half of America is Republican. And the thing is, it won't happen. Things will probably not get better if he gets impeached. Impeachment just means another authoritarian leader takes control of the country. Also, he's far from being a communist. If he were communist, we'd have a command economy, he'd ban all guns (which he isn't doing), he'd veto CISPA (if it had passed the Senate), etc. Any of the political leaders are more corporatist than anything else. Money generates more words for them than their brains. Therefore, we should be fighting against corporatism, not every single ideology that's slightly left.

Obama impeached, for what?

Helping JP Morgan, and other big banks make more money while raping us?

Helping Monsanto take monopoly on our food industry?

Helping create fear, and confusion about terrorists who can destroy us all?

Helping to show Americans that without government holding our hands, we are unable to do for ourselves?

Helping to write bills into law, that's sole intentions are to take away our rights?

Helping to start wars across the globe?

Come on people wake up this is all for our own good. If it wasn't then someone would have said something many years ago. Someone would have wrote I don't know, maybe a document that explains how a free country should be run.

Obviously this was never done, so Obama must be one of the greatest presidents ever, right up there with Bush.

The adminstration is beginning to be riddled with evidence and people coming forward with evidence of scam after scam. Look at Solyndra. How about delivery drivers coming forward saying the majority of the Obama phones they deliver goes to addresses that have addressees stating that person doesn't live there. 600phones to one address.
Fiskars anybody?
How about the recently vindicated Breitbart that was sued for defamation to only read after his death he was right all along regarding the massive multibillion $$ fraud at the USDA. This story can be found in the NY Times of all plces.
This man and his cronies have no regard for laws or the processes of law. I believe time will tell he is truelly a crook and a thug. Crook by making sure our monies go to special interests for votes and that he uses his office solely for personal financial gain under the premise of campaigning. A thug by silencing and in timidating whistleblowers.

Originally posted by sirjunlegun
The adminstration is beginning to be riddled with evidence and people coming forward with evidence of scam after scam. Look at Solyndra. How about delivery drivers coming forward saying the majority of the Obama phones they deliver goes to addresses that have addressees stating that person doesn't live there. 600phones to one address.
Fiskars anybody?
How about the recently vindicated Breitbart that was sued for defamation to only read after his death he was right all along regarding the massive multibillion $$ fraud at the USDA. This story can be found in the NY Times of all plces.
This man and his cronies have no regard for laws or the processes of law. I believe time will tell he is truelly a crook and a thug. Crook by making sure our monies go to special interests for votes and that he uses his office solely for personal financial gain under the premise of campaigning. A thug by silencing and in timidating whistleblowers.

edit on 28-4-2013 by sirjunlegun because: (no reason given)

very well said. I am of the opinion we nee an across the globe sweep. How it needs to be done, Is somethingh I cant say. but the banks, governements and corporations. We need a cleaning on it all.

Keep dreaming.

Obama has a team of lawyers who analyze the constitution and current laws/precedents.

reply to post by mactheaxe

Iceland has a great model. If alot of these folks were in the private sector they would be in prison.
i

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
If bush&cheney who allowed or participated in killing 3000 people on 9-11-2001 could not or would not be impeached then why should obama be impeached? Not saying obama is perfect, but compared to bush he certainly is.

If romney was president this nation would have been far worse imho. The things I disagree with obama and the democrats are rather minor compared to the things I disagree with the republicans. Still I don't plan on voting democrat or republican for the forseable future.

One person that DEFINITELY should be impeached from this administration was eric "the dick" holder. He was responsible for sending arms to the drug cartels in mexico and is trying to cover-up everything. Truckloads of ak-47s and ammo shipped to them.

I also disagree with their severe gun banning agenda. I am for mild gun control, nothing remotely resembling what this administration had in plan. I am also against widespread drone warfare and shrinking the MIC as much as necessary to balance the budget.

edit on 28/4/13 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)

If you think Eric Holder should be taken out, why shouldn't Obama take responsibility for ordering the sealing of Fast and Furious documents?

Bush should've been impeached and Obama should be impeached too. They make it so that these 'figureheads' are able to fall back on let their underlings take blame. Real reasons for impeachment are probably far and few between...which is a shame.

Originally posted by Ghost375
Keep dreaming.

Obama has a team of lawyers who analyze the constitution and current laws/precedents.

Are you trying to argue that going into Libya was Constitutional and legal? LOL!

2 lawyers deciding the fate of the 16 year old who was the target of a drone strike makes it 'legal'? LOL!

Come on now, Obama supporter, you have to try harder than that.

The funny thing is even if Obama were impeached nothing would change. People on here act like they're knowledgable about the government and yet they buy into the MSM illusion that the President is all powerful. Before you start blaming Obama for anything you may want to take a look at your Congress.

Originally posted by six67seven
no offense OP but how is this on the front page already?

mods must think this is going to be riveting! or not

Oooooohhhh, now I understand. This explains everything

edit on 27-4-2013 by six67seven because: (no reason given)

Sometimes it's important, for perspective, to remember
how some mods around here...are not very moderate.
And that's their perrogative .
But it's also mine to note it.

reply to post by MrSpad


Thank you for your refreshing dose of sanity

Originally posted by MrInquisitive
And then there was Bill Clinton who didn't do anything worthy of impeachment, and yet he was.

You forgot about lying under oath.

If you had been caught doing that, do you honestly think you would have just received a slap on the wrist?

Granted, what he did was more of a personal affront that I am sure he paid a price for to his wife (LOL).

The stack of race cards are all in neat rows filling stadium after stadium with quivering hands over them aching to start heaving them through the partnered MSM.

I'm in Idaho so... real news doesn't get here. I actually had to surf the web for an unbiased source of information. Don't trust word of mouth in these parts.

Obama Shying Away from Executive Orders - The Hill

This article explains how the Obama Administration uses its executive powers for anyone who is interested.

But Obama’s powers are far from absolute. His orders could be undone by judicial action, new laws passed by congress or future presidents. That said, the president enjoys a measure of flexibility thanks to the lack of consensus about the limits of his authority, a subject that has been debated for generations, Mayer said.

“It comes from his power as chief executive and the fact that no one really knows what that means,” he said. “When authority is ambiguous, presidents act.”