It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Dozens of journalists sifted through millions of leaked records and thousands of names to produce ICIJ’s investigation into offshore secrecy.
A cache of 2.5 million files has cracked open the secrets of more than 120,000 offshore companies and trusts, exposing hidden dealings of politicians, con men and the mega-rich the world over.
Up to $32 trillion stashed offshore
Originally posted by freedomSlave...
or am I the fool for paying my taxes.
Originally posted by ForwardDrift
I don't quite understand why stable nations just don't standardize their tax rules and regulations so that tax sheltering becomes difficult, if not obsolete. Any nation directly benefiting from tax sheltering has to realize the folly in thinking that the short-term financial benefit of allowing tax sheltering won't out way the long-term negative impact that tax sheltering has over the broader market. It seems like its just another way to distort the true cost of anything, which usually ends with horrible market-correcting consequences for everyone involved (including the shelter). But then again, I don't have a Ph.D in Economics nor Finance, so what do I really know? But, it just seems intuitively stupid to me to be the shelter-er for any person, knowing that it will impact you one way or another.
Originally posted by gladtobehere
Originally posted by freedomSlave...
or am I the fool for paying my taxes.
You're the fool.
Well, not a fool but you are onto something.
Instead of demanding that these scapegoats hand over more of their money to a corrupt, wasteful system, how about we pay less???
A LOT less.
Originally posted by dean007
well lets just haircut the cr@p out of it
divide it up for everyone on the earth give every person a paycheck straight out of those accounts
or wipe the worlds debt problem solved
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
Originally posted by ForwardDrift
I don't quite understand why stable nations just don't standardize their tax rules and regulations so that tax sheltering becomes difficult, if not obsolete. Any nation directly benefiting from tax sheltering has to realize the folly in thinking that the short-term financial benefit of allowing tax sheltering won't out way the long-term negative impact that tax sheltering has over the broader market. It seems like its just another way to distort the true cost of anything, which usually ends with horrible market-correcting consequences for everyone involved (including the shelter). But then again, I don't have a Ph.D in Economics nor Finance, so what do I really know? But, it just seems intuitively stupid to me to be the shelter-er for any person, knowing that it will impact you one way or another.
Absolutely and its very very simple
1. Flat tax rate for every citizen of x% of GROSS income, no exceptions.
2. Post tax state allowance, flat amount for every citizen, this replaces ALL welfare ALL state pensions etc
3. Optional 1/100th top up. where you can increase 2 by 1/100th of NET RPI adjusted tax paid.
work it out !! and apply known gross incomes and compare to current net incomes.
You can also do a variant of this for company tax:
1. Flat tax rate of the top line of Grossmargin (gross margin is a very difficult number to fiddle. In fact it is counter productive to report a lower value than reality due to stock market valuations)
2. Post tax rebate based on the ratio of highest earner to lowest earner. This encourages more equitable pay rates.