It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DJW001
As has been pointed out, you are simply rephrasing the statement. The redshift is caused by the interaction of photons in spacetime, which is expanding.
Originally posted by Ghost375
A thread trying to prove/disprove physics content with no math.
smh.
When you have polka dots on a fabric, and stretch this fabric, polka dots NEVER collide with each other.
No, they are not sensitive to elevation etc...
In a series of experiments described in the September 24 issue of Science, researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colo., registered differences in the passage of time between two high-precision optical atomic clocks when one was elevated by just a third of a meter or when one was set in motion at speeds of less than 10 meters per second.
Google atomic clocks, I assure you it is not a malfunction, it is functioning perfectly,
This is an exact measurement, doesnt matter if the cloxk is kechanical digital or other, the exact same measured reukt will occur, it is not the clocks function, it is time dilation.
Originally posted by Phage
Bread analogy? I don't know what you mean.
But perhaps you might consider that galaxies are do not have fixed locations within space.
But no physicists ever agreed at that time.
Originally posted by Phage
Just because none agreed with your theory doesn't mean that they don't think galaxies move.
Then apparently you misunderstood what you were being told.
I was under the impression, when I talked to other physicists, that cosmologists never did.
Again your use of an inadequate analogy is confusing you. Inflation doesn't stretch space, it is an expansion of space.
But I still don't think spacetime stretch will explain redshift.