It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Imagewerx
No one either animal or human can "manipulate" frequencies.A frequency is the period over which an event repeats itself.Radio waves,visible light,and the radiation used to cook food in a microwave oven all have a specific frequency but no physical form so can't be manipulated by any living being.Waves in a pond have physical form and can be manipulated by simply wading into the pond or lowering say a piece of wood into it.
I put up a picture of what the IRI looks like when it is transmitting. I don't know if it was transmitting at the time but it doesn't matter because that's what it looks like whether it's transmitting or not.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Phage
I put up a picture of what the IRI looks like when it is transmitting. I don't know if it was transmitting at the time but it doesn't matter because that's what it looks like whether it's transmitting or not.
Aren't you at all curious about what HAARP looks like when it's on?
Has social media wizardry so clouded your sense of discovery that information like 180 towers on 23 acres, connected by sF6 spark gaps ......
The photo of Tesla in the camp chair that I previously put up is only a 22 foot arc. We're talking 180 towers on 23 acres for heavens' sake. The noise alone must be deafening.
Originally posted by Bedlam
If you go back to page 1, the op was about HIPAS testing spark gap powered radiators.
They have SF6 filled gaps in the center, the halves of the dipole are charged to a very high voltage then they fire it with a laser pulse.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Bedlam
And as well as it no longer existing, it is also not HAARP - HIPAS had antennas that were horizontal and 53m long, and since the spark gap is pressurized SF6 you wouldn't see it unless looking through a built in window in the container anyway!
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by Imagewerx
No one either animal or human can "manipulate" frequencies.A frequency is the period over which an event repeats itself.Radio waves,visible light,and the radiation used to cook food in a microwave oven all have a specific frequency but no physical form so can't be manipulated by any living being.Waves in a pond have physical form and can be manipulated by simply wading into the pond or lowering say a piece of wood into it.
oh dear, so in your world no one talks, or sings, or makes a noice. All done by manipulating frequencies.
Radio is done by also manipulating a radio frequency, either by Amplitude, Frequency or Phase modulation. etc.
BTW even if these were spark gaps they would not ba "SF6 spark gaps" - these would be "air spark gaps" - since the insulating material between them is air, not SF6 (Sulphur Hexafluoride).
Originally posted by luxordelphi
Aren't you at all curious about what HAARP looks like when it's on? Has social media wizardry so clouded your sense of discovery that information like 180 towers on 23 acres, connected by sF6 spark gaps doesn't make you go dang, what does that look like when it's on?
Originally posted by luxordelphi And if the gap is filled, with SF 6, how is it a gap?
Originally posted by luxordelphi
So, Gaul, in the interests of building the HAARP array from the ground up, and understanding the difference between HIPAS and HAARP and why HAARP would content itself with less than half the ERP that HIPAS was capable of at the time it disappeared into the night:
how exactly do you know that there are no spark gaps of whatever type at HAARP?
We know that Tesla and Eastlund understood HAARP.
Where does that leave us?
Originally posted by Bedlam
Tesla didn't live into the tube age, he would not have understood phased arrays, he likely didn't have a clue about the ionosphere. So to say "he understood HAARP" is incorrect. Eastlund probably did - he designed that sort of thing.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
BTW even if these were spark gaps they would not ba "SF6 spark gaps" - these would be "air spark gaps" - since the insulating material between them is air, not SF6 (Sulphur Hexafluoride).
So, Gaul, in the interests of building the HAARP array from the ground up, and understanding the difference between HIPAS and HAARP and why HAARP would content itself with less than half the ERP that HIPAS was capable of at the time it disappeared into the night:
how exactly do you know that there are no spark gaps of whatever type at HAARP?
And if the gap is filled, with SF 6, how is it a gap?
Please appreciate my dilemma: I know that you know absolutely squat about HAARP.
I have openly admitted knowing just slightly above squat about HAARP in the first thread on HAARP I ever made. We know that Tesla and Eastlund understood HAARP.
We know that one of the few people able to actually contribute salient points in this thread had a number of their posts removed.
Where does that leave us?
But what you got for a high ERP at HIPAS was a very low duty cycle and low average power output. It's the nature of that sort of transmitter. You get about a half-cycle of high ERP, then squat.
It's not that sort of transmitter. Hertzian dipoles don't really HAVE a transmitter in a classical sense, it's a tuned dipole with a spark gap. Gakona is a CW output rig using stock class AB finals. You don't need or want spark gaps in that sort of rig.
With a half dozen posters who know what they're talking about?