It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

United Nations W/Bill Clinton WWIII

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 22 2004 @ 07:03 PM
link   
Clinton U.N. WWIII

ww1.mid-day.com...


..........

Could be a start of something bad in the world (WWIII); If Clinton becomes leader of the UN, and Bush is in office, UN could divide our country in the name of America ignoring UN's due-diligence policy (in reference to armed conflict). It would be Clinton, China, France, Germany, Spain and other non-Iraq supporting countries calling for a change in American policy. We may even embrace the claims of the UN seeing that America is divided.

Picture United States 2006 (if under Bush); UN could use international force to unseat a threat to "world peace" (Bush admin). There could be a revolutionary war, Americans with Bush (also UN countries with Bush) Vs. Americans with Clinton & UN.

Ending ~2012.


This could happen what if the U.S. invades Iran/Saudi Arabia next......?



posted on Oct, 22 2004 @ 07:28 PM
link   
Where in that article does it state that WWIII will occur? It just states that Bill Clinton is interesting in taking over the UN...
, still, it is odd. o_o.



posted on Oct, 22 2004 @ 07:29 PM
link   
But according to your point of view, it would be better if Kerry gets elected, so they won't have a world war.



posted on Oct, 22 2004 @ 11:35 PM
link   
not exactly.... Kerry would feed the plan of Clinton, and let us all remember just as many peolple hate Kerry as hate Bush......



posted on Oct, 22 2004 @ 11:38 PM
link   
Of for the love of...

Lately, everytime ANYTHING happens its being seen as the precursor to the coming apocalypse.

Don't be so freakin' paranoid.



posted on Oct, 23 2004 @ 06:23 AM
link   
Forget the middle east for a second and consider a war with North Korea.
after all the second largest american deployment is on the Border of the DMZ between North and South Korea and we all know the tales of the Korean soldiers from vietnam they are a fierce fighting force the type of soldier that we had trouble fighting in vietnam and tht is after we had experienced jungle soldiers.

anyway not a paranoid call for the end of the world just a thought



posted on Oct, 23 2004 @ 07:13 AM
link   
~~

WOAH... The Second Coming of ...'Caligula'

(hot-words; encephalitis, orgy (Drucilla), Statue in Jerusalem (of who else))

& the ever present 'spin meisters', then & now...
who explained Caligulas' insanity & tyranny as merely......

a product of a 'painful childhood' & simply being 'misunderstood

With only casual inspection, the Caligula & Clinton stories might be intertwined....seperated by time

? anyone want to run with this morsel??



posted on Oct, 23 2004 @ 07:30 AM
link   
WWIII? Hardley.
Imagine this. Bill Clinton as head of the UN. John John Kerry as president of the United States. I DREAM about a plan like this!
A Democrate in the white house, and a Democrate as leader of world disputes
It doesnt get any better than that.

[sarcasm] First the Dems took the white house, then they took the UN, next THE WORLD!!!!MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH[/sarcasm]

Get a grip. Your daily life will be no different than it is now. And even if NWO is in there plans, then Im for it. It would make it easier to go into Pakistan, or China, or wherever Ilikelittleboys Bin Laden is that week.



posted on Oct, 23 2004 @ 10:33 AM
link   
Clinton would fit right into the UN. He likes to covertly embezzle funds (China missiles)... Then you have France and the oil for food scandal. UN is morally bankrupt.

Coffee Cup Annan will be impeached by next year (Oil scandal). And another impeached leader will step in (Clinton).



posted on Oct, 23 2004 @ 11:01 AM
link   
Clinton, unless the way the UN works were to change, would never be able to be Secretary General. That position is given to a member nation classified as a 'third world' country.

Although the scary thought, at its logical end, would be President Kerry, Secretary of State Clinton, Secretary General Clinton. The I guess Kerry would get his wish of only deploying US troops at the direction of the United Nations. After all, according to Kerry, US military deaths are only justified when the occur under the banner of the UN, and not the US. He said so in 1994, and again said a similair thing in April of this year.

Now that should be a submission in the Halloween Short Story Contest.



posted on Oct, 23 2004 @ 11:47 AM
link   
Clinton, unless the way the UN works were to change, would never be able to be Secretary General. That position is given to a member nation classified as a 'third world' country.

________________________________________________________

How Stupid Where They When They Made That Rule?

What Are the Responsibilities of the Secretary General Anyway? Isn't that a Powerless Position?

I am a compassionate conservative and would Love to See Clinton in the UN.

I don't see that tearing the country apart.

Clinton would be good for the world. He would make US sign the Kyoto.



posted on Oct, 23 2004 @ 12:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nerdling
Of for the love of...

Lately, everytime ANYTHING happens its being seen as the precursor to the coming apocalypse.

Don't be so freakin' paranoid.


Nerdling does have a point.
This amount of paranoia isnt good for you...



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join