It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So which modern materials should they have used in the 80s and early 90s while these aircraft were under development?
originally posted by: Jukiodone
From OP:
"A physicist from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory had questions about how the aircraft's onboard systems would interact with a surrounding plasma field. For instance in order for the plasma field to be effective it would have to to be so powerful that the aircraft itself would have to be shielded from it's own stealth system.
originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: FormOfTheLord
For the record, the photos in your post are Prandtl-Glauert singularities, not plasma.
www.military-heat.com...
First developed by the Russians, plasma stealth technology is also known as “Active Stealth Technology”. Plasma stealth is a proposed process that uses ionized gas (plasma) to reduce the radar cross section (RCS) of an aircraft. A plasma stream is injected in front of the aircraft covering the entire body of the aircraft and absorbing most of the electromagnetic energy of the radar waves, thus making the aircraft difficult to detect.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
Maybe it looks something like this. . . .
I wonder if there is any new breakthroughs with this technology?
originally posted by: JMH61
If I am trying to be stealthy, the last thing I want to do is glow or give off radiation. I may be able to absorb photons in the microwave range, but I will be emitting radiation in the UV/visible/infrared range.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: JMH61
The amount of light you're talking about with a system like this, when used for laminar flow control, is going to be no worse than a low light formation light, and is only going to be noticeable at very short ranges. At that point, you're pretty screwed if they can see it or not.