It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lawmakers from the group of 56 European and Central Asian nations have been observing U.S. elections since 2002, without incident. Their presence has become a flashpoint this year, however, as Republicans accuse Democrats of voter fraud while Democrats counter that GOP-inspired voter ID laws aim to disenfranchise minority voters. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott further fueled the controversy on Tuesday when he sent a letter to the OSCE warning the organization that its representatives “are not authorized by Texas law to enter a polling place” and that it “may be a criminal offense for OSCE’s representatives to maintain a presence within 100 feet of a polling place's entrance.” The letter goes on to accuse the group of having met with liberal organizations that oppose Voter ID laws. The OSCE put out an interim report last week saying that “recent state-level legislative initiatives to limit early voting and introduce stricter voter identification have become highly polarized.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by Juggernog
I don't see the issue here? I read the article and I fail to see the problem? Why are Texan officials so scared of the international observers? If the Texan election process is secure, and if it promotes equal voting rights for all citizens, why the aggression against the observers?
Texas could set an example to others of how the election process is suppose to work, so I fail to see what they have to hide by these observers coming in.
Originally posted by Juggernog
They have no business butting into our business
The OSCE, which sends monitoring teams to elections around the world, has been observing U.S. elections since 2002, when the Bush administration invited them after the hotly contested 2000 presidential election. They are expected to observe in 15 states on November 6th.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Originally posted by Juggernog
They have no business butting into our business
But we have business in their countries?
Again, you still have not addressed the fundamental question here. What do they have to hide from these elections observers?
Originally posted by Phoenix
Must be a young-un, Ann Richards (RIP) was last Democrat Governor in Texas 91' - 95' God bless Texas!
Anything UN sponsored is suspect in my book but theres a storm a coming from what I hear.edit on 25-10-2012 by Phoenix because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Fuzzy Wabbit
Makes you wonder what the conservatives in Texas fear. Absolutely shameful!
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by Juggernog
I don't see the issue here? I read the article and I fail to see the problem? Why are Texan officials so scared of the international observers? If the Texan election process is secure, and if it promotes equal voting rights for all citizens, why the aggression against the observers?
Texas could set an example to others of how the election process is suppose to work, so I fail to see what they have to hide by these observers coming in.
Originally posted by BobbyTarass
It's as funny as it is sad, really.
So when it comes to the USA monitoring the voting process in other countries you don't hear a single complain from any person in Texas and yet when that is applied to them it's all about "butting in our business".
Those guys were send to keep an eye on the votes in order to avoid fraud, why in the hell would you be against that for god's sake ? It's not like they play another role in the election, they're making sure everything is going according to the law.
How retarded can you be ?
The international community supports one candidate.
The UN is biased and as crooked as the day is long. This alone is enough reason to deny them the opportunity to interfere.
If they were invited by official channels then the states need to know this so they can handle the situation appropriately.
Even federal intervention must be requested by the governor in any state of emergency, let alone an internationally self assigned group that is openly hostile to the US except when we pay half of the UN's budget.
Let the UN go take care of someone who needs it and stop interfering in our politics.
I see it as hostile intervention from foreign powers because that's really all it is.