It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spy66
Ok since you bring this up.
I have a question for you. In this image you have three masses made of the same materials within a vacuume space, but they are different in size. My question is. Which mass attracks which? Or do they stay in the same positions?
Originally posted by spy66
In other words there is no gravity reduction towards center. >A vacuume have no gravity.
So if there is no gravity from N to S how can it fall towards the center?
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by spy66
In other words there is no gravity reduction towards center. >A vacuume have no gravity.
Objects are effected by gravity, being in a vacuum does not matter
So if there is no gravity from N to S how can it fall towards the center?
Why claim there is no gravity?
Originally posted by spy66
A vacuume is a space without gravity.
A vacuume is a space with no matter, temprature or time. Look it up.
Originally posted by spy66
My question is:
If you built a vacuume tunnel that runs from the North pole throught earths center and to the South Pole. And on the North Pole you placed a 10kg weight into the vacuume tunnel. Would the weight fall/travel to the South Pole?
My teacher/Professor tells me that the 10kg weight would fall to the South Pole. I am telling him that the 10kg weight would not travel anywhere.
I have also googled this question and found that a lot of other people agree with my teacher. But they are all wrong. Does anybody here know why my teacher is wrong?
Originally posted by spy66
Totally ignorant guy here, so forgive if this is stupid: Isn't the universe in a vacuum? If so, according to your premise, none of the planets or galaxies would be able to move. Right?
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by alfa1
My opinion is that it would accelerate as it falls, passing through the center of the earth and reaching the south pole 42 minutes later. On its way up to the south pole it would be decelerating and reach zero speed at the surface.
Then, like a pendulum, it would return to you at the north pole another 42 minutes later.... then back to the south pole, and so on forever.
Of course this assumes perfect vacuum, no touching the sides of the tunnel, and so forth.
edit on 20-10-2012 by alfa1 because: (no reason given)
Not true.
In a perfect vacuume isolate inside a tunnel from N to S. There is no way the 10kg would be effected by earths gravity. How can it be effected by earths gravity inside the vacuume tunnel?edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by SpearMint
Yes it would.
The answer is wrong. If i tell you that there is vacuume inside the tunnel all the way from the North pole to the South pole. How could mass travel to the South Pole? Or even to the core?
Why do you think a vacuum would stop it?
My conclusion is that the vacuume is isloleted from earth mass/gravity by the tunnel walls. If you have a equal vacuume from N to S there is no mass to cause motion to the 10kg weight. So it would never move.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
it would stop in the middle...the field differential in centre = 0....it be suspended.
interia = 0.
.
Theoretically, there is 'no gravity' at the center of the Earth, so it should stop and stay suspended there.