Ron Paul - “It is no coincidence that the century of total war coincided with the century of centr

If you watch any of the Bill Still series on the creation of central banking (Money Masters, Secret of Oz etc), you know that the central banksters LOVED wars.

In their view, it was (and is) the best way to generate debt, which is the lifeblood of the debt based monetary scheme.

Ron Paul knows this as well, which is why he is such a huge advocate against foreign militarism.

Not only does he see it as morally objectionable but he realizes that its bankrupting the United States.

He states it very well at the end of this video:

oh....dude....good eye catching this!! stars....a flag, my man I'll write him in....

Ron Paul said a LOT of things

”Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. These aren’t my figures, that is the assumption you can gather from” the report.”

“The Criminals who terrorize our cities – in riots and on every non-riot day – are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are.”

“I wouldn’t vote against getting rid of the Jim Crow laws.”

“Immigrants can spread diseases for which we may have no immunity. There is also the question of crime and culture. Many immigrants come from countries with different legal structures and are not willing to behave in the way we expect American citizens to behave.”

Yet Ron Paul supporters generally don't seem to accept his views on race.
Just because Ron Paul says something does not make it so

Central banking is a FORM of warfare.. IMF, World Bank, etc. have mastered this on a geopolitical scale. -Mags

reply to post by Superhans


I am still trying to wrap my head around how you can dispute any of the things he said that you posted there.

Maybe stepping beyond the thought that everyone that points this out is a "racist" would help.
Open your mind a bit. There is nothing said there that isn't factual.
(Even the Jim Crow thing. It has nothing to do with race. Taking that sound bite and acting like it does is small-minded and more than likely comes from your personal bias. Hint, it is about whether it is constitutional or not)

I won't debate that....The rest of those quotes are truth.

Not to mention, I am not sure how "pointing out" what you perceive as "racism" negates the quote from the OP.
Oh, that's right, it doesn't. You just pointed that out to divert attention to the "race issue".......

Obviously....when all else fails, throw the "race card". Works on some every time. (Nice try though)

Originally posted by Superhans
Ron Paul said a LOT of things

”Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. These aren’t my figures, that is the assumption you can gather from” the report.”

“The Criminals who terrorize our cities – in riots and on every non-riot day – are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are.”

“I wouldn’t vote against getting rid of the Jim Crow laws.”

“Immigrants can spread diseases for which we may have no immunity. There is also the question of crime and culture. Many immigrants come from countries with different legal structures and are not willing to behave in the way we expect American citizens to behave.”

Yet Ron Paul supporters generally don't seem to accept his views on race.
Just because Ron Paul says something does not make it so

I'm a local living in Singapore. I have to say his speaks the word of truths.

And I know that Bilderberg Group consider him as a real threat.

Originally posted by Superhans
Ron Paul said a LOT of things

”Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. These aren’t my figures, that is the assumption you can gather from” the report.”

“The Criminals who terrorize our cities – in riots and on every non-riot day – are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are.”

“Immigrants can spread diseases for which we may have no immunity. There is also the question of crime and culture. Many immigrants come from countries with different legal structures and are not willing to behave in the way we expect American citizens to behave.”

Yet Ron Paul supporters generally don't seem to accept his views on race.
Just because Ron Paul says something does not make it so

Amazing - for a moment there I thought all those quotes were referring to Australia - especially that last one.

If it looks like a spade, and it acts like a spade, chances are it IS a spade.

Ron Paul calls a spade a spade - it's not racism - its the truth.

Sometimes its hard to swallow but.............behave like a human with morals and ethics or suffer the consequences, integrate into our societies' customs and traditions or bugger off.

reply to post by wisdomnotemotion

And I know that Bilderberg Group consider him as a real threat.

A member of the Bilderberg group steering committee (Peter Theil) donated millions to his SuperPac so, they clearly like him.

reply to post by Superhans


Ron Pauls newsletters said those things, which are really just as bad, because it means he has no sense of oversight and his fan base clearly gets off on whitey should black fear porn (like many on ATS).

The more ridiculous/stupid quotes include;

Of course his cult will somehow defend these quotes too.

The November 1990 issue of the Political Report had kind words for David Duke.

After the Los Angeles riots, one article in a newsletter claimed, "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

On AIDS! "A politically protected disease thanks to payola and the influence of the homosexual lobby that will poison the blood supply."

Beware the “Malicious Gay”: African-Americans are not the only target of the newsletters’ ire. Ron Paul’s publications also feature unusually bad medical advice punctuated with anti-gay fantasies. “Those who don’t commit sodomy, who don’t get a blood transfusion, and who don’t swap needles, are virtually assured of not getting AIDS unless they are deliberately infected by a malicious gay, as was Kimberly Bergalis.”

A March 1993 Survival Report describes Bill Clinton’s supposedly “illegitimate children, black and white: ‘woods colts’ in backwoods slang.”

Instructions on Murdering Black Youth: A 1992 newsletter provided fairly detailed instructions on the best way to shoot and kill an African-American and get away with it. “If you live in a major city, you’ve probably already heard about the newest threat to your life and limb, and your family: carjacking. It is the hip-hop thing to do among the urban youth who play unsuspecting whites like pianos. . . . An ex-cop I know advises that if you have to use a gun on a youth, you should leave the scene immediately, disposing of the wiped off gun as soon as possible. Such a gun cannot, of course, be registered to you, but one bought privately (through the classifieds, for example). I frankly don’t know what to make of such advice, but even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense. For the animals are coming.”

Needlin’: Paul’s December 1989 newsletter claims that roving bands of African-Americans are trying to give white people HIV. According to the newsletter, “at least 39 white women have been stuck with used hypodermic needles-perhaps infected with AIDS-by gangs of black girls between the ages of 12 and 14. . . . Who can doubt that if the situation had been reversed, if white girls had done this to black women, we would have been subjected to months-long nation-wide propaganda campaign on the evils of white America? The double standard strikes again.”

One referred to Martin Luther King Jr. as "the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours" and who "seduced underage girls and boys."

Another referred to Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist and congresswoman as "Barbara Morondon," the "archetypical half-educated victimologist."

An October 1990 edition of the Political Report ridicules black activists, led by Al Sharpton, for demonstrating at the Statue of Liberty in favor of renaming New York City after Martin Luther King. The newsletter suggests that “Welfaria,” “Zooville,” “Rapetown,” “Dirtburg,”and “Lazyopolis ” would be better alternatives—and says, “Next time, hold that demonstration at a food stamp bureau or a crack house.”

On Homosexuals "Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressures forced them to hide their activities."

www.buzzfeed.com...

And of course is against the civil rights act because of "property rights"......

In May 2011, Paul told MSNBC that he would have voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended Jim Crow. He questioned the act because it took authority away from property owners. Evidently, Paul values the rights of racist property owners over those of African Americans whose housing, employment, schooling and leisure activities were all dictated by Jim Crow.

reply to post by gladtobehere


Nice thread OP! I hope a MOD comes in and throws the flag on all of those who are trying to derail the thread!

I do believe the thread is about how the central bank came into power from all of the wars? Just so happens it was said, by Ron Paul!

For a second I thought this thread was about Ron Paul's views on central banking and the constant wars/conflicts the western world is in but lo and behold who knew this thread was really about the Ron Paul's Newsletters from the 1990s.....

So forget central banking and millions upon millions of lives lost and lets focus on whether Ron Paul is a racist............................................................................................................................ because that point hasn't been discussed to DEATH on ATS and everywhere else on the web......................................................................................................

reply to post by Superhans

Nope.

Youre quoting from a newsletter with a ghost writer.

Next.

reply to post by wisdomnotemotion

And I know that Bilderberg Group consider him as a real threat.

And that is why he will never be POTUS.

Without the backing of the Bilderberg group, you will never be leader of a western country.

ETA:- Of course central bankers love warfare. Western countries borrow to spend on weapons that destroy countries, who need to borrow to rebuild!. It's a no brainer, surely?

reply to post by RealSpoke

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by Superhans

 

In May 2011, Paul told MSNBC that he would have voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended Jim Crow. He questioned the act because it took authority away from property owners. Evidently, Paul values the rights of racist property owners over those of African Americans whose housing, employment, schooling and leisure activities were all dictated by Jim Crow.

Thats some "source".

Here is the interview. At 5:27, Ron Paul says: "I wouldnt have voted against getting rid of Jim Crow laws"...


The media lies or distorts and the Obama sheeple just eat it up.

I love you big government lap dogs. You're oblivious of the fact that government creates the problem, then applaud it for correcting itself. Its the government that allowed slavery and Jim Crow laws by ignoring the Constitution in the first place, but dont let facts get in the way. Lets praise them for passing the Civil Rights Amendment.

Same pattern over and over and over. Pick your issue, government creates the problem, eventually corrects itself (usually a fail as well), congratulates itself and basks in the praise of the adoring sheeple.

Oh and, "OutKast Searcher", welcome back. Howd you get around your ban?

Ron Paul always tells the truth...even when that truth is unpopular.

He never cared for politically correct speech...and that's why I like him.

He has the guts to stand up and tell it like it is. He has the guts stand up
to big government. He has the guts to stand up for all Americans....

....But too many Americans didn't seem to have the guts to stand up for him...

...and some of the dumber schmucks even attempt to deride him for his honesty....it's a sad day for liberty

Originally posted by Superhans
Ron Paul said a LOT of things

”Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. These aren’t my figures, that is the assumption you can gather from” the report.”

“The Criminals who terrorize our cities – in riots and on every non-riot day – are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are.”

“I wouldn’t vote against getting rid of the Jim Crow laws.”

“Immigrants can spread diseases for which we may have no immunity. There is also the question of crime and culture. Many immigrants come from countries with different legal structures and are not willing to behave in the way we expect American citizens to behave.”

Yet Ron Paul supporters generally don't seem to accept his views on race.
Just because Ron Paul says something does not make it so

You can never agree 100% with what a single person says or thinks. You won't like all that either Obama or Romney for that matter has to say about a lot of things.

However, in the big picture now, where the world is terrorized by the self-righteous wars by the western forces, having a clear mindset or a no-war policy is above all THE most important reason to get elected. Noting is more important today than ending all struggles and ALL western involvements in the middle-east or else where, including shutting down all foreign military bases around the world.

Then once that is accomplished, we can look at the internal affairs capabilities of our so-called elected officials, and kick their ass to the curb if we don't like their policy on that area.
4 Years to Ron Paul would mean the end of American tyranny in the middle-east and not enough time to make life bad for the middle and lower class. I think the goal here most definitely justifies the means...

...and that is indeed what politicians are... a means towards a goal. We just gotta make damn sure we enforce our democratic rights and don't end up with a corporatocracy for too long.

reply to post by gladtobehere


I hate to be off topic but I was curious, Outkast Searcher was banned? What for? His Ron Paul views and Obama supporting always irked the hell out of me but I appreciated a lot of his knowledge on other aspects of politics.

As you can probably see by my avatar I'm a Dr Paul fan and have supported him since 08. He speaks so much truth people cannot handle it, since they are used to living in their realm of blissful ignorance.

Many say this is the very reason both JFK and RFK were killed. Neither wanted America to have anything to do with sending troops to Vietnam, or continuing the war once it got started. It is FACT that many large businesses were making huge amounts of money off of this war, and they did not want it to end. And they wanted it to start before it started, and since JFK likely was not going to get the US involved, he had to be eliminated.

RFK was eliminated over Vietnam as well, but also because he made a bunch of people very nervous because it was obvious he would re-open the investigation into his brother's assassination. And he had more information already than the general public, so he likely would have gotten somewhere. Anyway, all wars are good for a variety of big businesses. I'm pretty sure this is common knowledge by now, and this is a LARGE part of the reason, if not the ONLY reason Bush went into Iraq, and that we currently have troops overseas fighting an unseen enemy...I mean we are at war all the time, but there is absolutely no opposing army. Yet we are at war how long now?

One shouldn't be able to declare WAR on terrorists, as they don't have armies or nations. I mean seriously, the Korean Conflict was not even called a war, and there were many more Americans dying overseas then than there are today. That actually pisses me off, as I feel bad for those who fought in Korea. I have relatives, and have talked to old timers, and it pisses them off as well that despite their efforts and the lives lost, many politicians acted like it wasn't a real war. War is war, with or without a declaration.

Anyway, Dr. Paul is absolutely right that there is no coincidence, because once centralized banking was developed, crooks in the system, and politicians, were going to make as much money as possible, anywhere they absolutely could do so. If them making more money means sacrificing the lives of thousands upon thousands of American men, who cares right? I mean it is MONEY. This has always been the most important thing to people like that.

And this is exactly why I preach that these people are evil. They make money off of the suffering of other people. This is also why I say many of the super-rich are cold hearted people who lack compassion. Because to make that much money, you have to get your hands dirty, either directly or indirectly. Either way they still hold the same responsibility for the atrocities that are committed. This is also why I dog Republicans so much for not having compassion. If there were ever a poll done, or statistics pored over, it would become obvious fairly quickly that there is much more money on the Republican side than the Democratic, as far as voters are concerned. And considering what I said above, the profit of one man is damage to another, to put it as Montaigne did...although if I recall he disagreed, but the times were much different, and his examples quite outdated. Plus there wasn't such a centralized bank as there is today.

Originally posted by wisdomnotemotion

Originally posted by Superhans
Ron Paul said a LOT of things

”Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. These aren’t my figures, that is the assumption you can gather from” the report.”

“The Criminals who terrorize our cities – in riots and on every non-riot day – are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are.”

“I wouldn’t vote against getting rid of the Jim Crow laws.”

“Immigrants can spread diseases for which we may have no immunity. There is also the question of crime and culture. Many immigrants come from countries with different legal structures and are not willing to behave in the way we expect American citizens to behave.”

Yet Ron Paul supporters generally don't seem to accept his views on race.
Just because Ron Paul says something does not make it so

I'm a local living in Singapore. I have to say his speaks the word of truths.

And I know that Bilderberg Group consider him as a real threat.

edit on 10/14/2012 by wisdomnotemotion because: missing word

I like Ron Paul - he's just a little too far off in his version of Utopia for any of his vision to ever become reality. That said, if you're living in Singapore, you can count yourself as part of that last quote - just a disease-spreading incubator ready to unleash plague on the rest of us should you ever return home.

Now I haven't fact-checked these quotes - much if what is said or quoted of politicians is complete b.s., but some of those read as though Paul has a strong double-standard. I wonder if some of that may have started since the Tea Party wasurned from Libertarian to Neo-Neocon after the Palin Infiltration about 6 months into the movement.

reply to post by Superhans


Cant help but notice you quote all these off site "quotes" yet you offer no source at all? Care to provide one?