It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Microorganisms that crashed to Earth embedded in the fragments of distant planets might have been the sprouts of life on this one, according to new research from Princeton University, the University of Arizona and the Centro de Astrobiología (CAB) in Spain.
Originally posted by davethebear
Of course it could have happened, why not?
Pretty similar in a way to a tree dropping its seeds and another tree sprouting from that seed......
Originally posted by Miccey
So i read this article at the Science Daily about
a planet that was smashed up. In the debries
they belive that life was present.
And thouse fragments crashed here on earth. Starting life
here...
So i ask, WHY is it so hard to belive that life HERE, DIDNT
start HERE?!?!?
If it started on the other planet, why not here...?!?!?!?
I dont get it...
Article
SNIP:
Microorganisms that crashed to Earth embedded in the fragments of distant planets might have been the sprouts of life on this one, according to new research from Princeton University, the University of Arizona and the Centro de Astrobiología (CAB) in Spain.
edit on 2012/9/25 by Miccey because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by luciddream
Originally posted by Miccey
So i read this article at the Science Daily about
a planet that was smashed up. In the debries
they belive that life was present.
And thouse fragments crashed here on earth. Starting life
here...
So i ask, WHY is it so hard to belive that life HERE, DIDNT
start HERE?!?!?
If it started on the other planet, why not here...?!?!?!?
I dont get it...
Article
SNIP:
Microorganisms that crashed to Earth embedded in the fragments of distant planets might have been the sprouts of life on this one, according to new research from Princeton University, the University of Arizona and the Centro de Astrobiología (CAB) in Spain.
edit on 2012/9/25 by Miccey because: (no reason given)
Its all just theories, we stick to whatever makes the most sense, we could never know where life started.
Panspermia is one of those...
Originally posted by borntowatch
Originally posted by davethebear
Of course it could have happened, why not?
Pretty similar in a way to a tree dropping its seeds and another tree sprouting from that seed......
Because we all know smashed planets are really trees that go into seed
Originally posted by PatrickGarrow17
I think this is the crux of origin theory.
What is the spark that brings forth the life that follows?
It is possible that Earth was impregnated with life from an outside source. But at some point, life must have started without any precedent. This implies two possibilities. One being that there is an element consistent throughout the universe that will drive matter toward life where ever possible. The other is that there are some extreme circumstances that create life as a byproduct, and life is not necessarily the norm throughout.
I lean toward the first explanation, and expect that life exists in many different forms throughout the universe.edit on 9/25/2012 by PatrickGarrow17 because: (no reason given)
...the strongest support yet for "lithopanspermia," the idea that the microorganisms that sprout life came to Earth -- or spread from Earth to other developing planets -- via collisions with meteorite-like planetary fragments.
Nowhere in the article dies it suggest life could not or did not, sprout from Earth. Why are you suggesting that is the case?
NASA's Curiosity rover mission has found evidence a stream once ran vigorously across the area on Mars where the rover is driving. There is earlier evidence for the presence of water on Mars, but this evidence -- images of rocks containing ancient streambed gravels -- is the first of its kind.
Originally posted by Miccey
reply to post by OMsk3ptic
How can we state that, when we dont KNOW, HOW life forms?
So how can we then say earth is too young?
Originally posted by OMsk3ptic
Originally posted by Miccey
reply to post by OMsk3ptic
How can we state that, when we dont KNOW, HOW life forms?
So how can we then say earth is too young?
Do some research and you'll find out why some think that. You have this question that you seem to be puzzled by, but have you even tried finding the answers out for yourself? There whole internet is at your fingertips.edit on 28-9-2012 by OMsk3ptic because: (no reason given)