It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aug 31 (Reuters Point Carbon) - President Barack Obama issued an executive order on Thursday that would increase the number of cogeneration plants in the U.S. by 50 percent by 2020, a move that would boost U.S. industrial energy efficiency and slash carbon emissions by 150 million tons per year.
"The Federal Government has limited but important authorities to overcome … barriers, and our efforts to support investment in industrial energy efficiency and CHP should involve coordinated engagement with a broad set of stakeholders," the order says.
BYPASSING GRIDLOCK
The Obama administration has been unable to get Congress to pass comprehensive energy and climate legislation that would set a price on carbon pollution and stimulate investment in renewable energy and CHP.
The administration has focused instead on devising direct regulations through cabinet agencies to help the U.S. meet the president's goal to cut greenhouse gas emissions 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020.
Thursday's executive order came just two days after the White House finalized a rule - developed with U.S. automakers - that would double fuel efficiency standards for automobiles and light trucks to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025.
Originally posted by Kharron
reply to post by 46ACE
This is great new OP... I'll give you a flag because this should be seen but no star as I really don't understand your tone with this -- are you trying to say lower carbon emissions and investing in cleaner energy is a bad thing?
It seems that this will force the companies who do not want to invest money into cleaning up their business to actually be motivated to do so. This is similar to the order where the president mandated American car companies start producing more fuel efficient cars by such and such year -- a good thing.
I look at the government as a tool of the people, it should be enacting and enforcing the rules and regulations that should benefit the people, the country and the world. I can't look as clean energy as anything else than a benefit to all three.
Khar
...this order directs certain executive departments and agencies to convene national and regional stakeholders to identify, develop, and encourage the adoption of investment models and State best practice policies for industrial energy efficiency and CHP (combined heat and power); provide technical assistance to States and manufacturers to encourage investment in industrial energy efficiency and CHP; provide public information on the benefits of investment in industrial energy efficiency and CHP; and use existing Federal authorities, programs, and policies to support investment in industrial energy efficiency and CHP.
The Departments of Energy, Commerce, and Agriculture, and the Environmental Protection Agency, in coordination with the National Economic Council, the Domestic Policy Council, the Council on Environmental Quality, and the Office of Science and Technology Policy, shall coordinate policies to encourage investment in industrial efficiency in order to reduce costs for industrial users, improve U.S. competitiveness, create jobs, and reduce harmful air pollution. In doing so, they shall engage States, industrial companies, utility companies, and other stakeholders to accelerate this investment. Specifically, these agencies shall, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law...
(a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
...and the nation's energy companies rejoice alongside the tatters of the alternative energy companies Obama "stimulated" at a complete loss for the taxpayers (see: Solyndra).
Moves like this are so blatently obvious. This has NOTHING to do with lowering carbon footprints and reducing emissions.
Originally posted by links234
reply to post by 46ACE
No, it doesn't increase or decrease anything. It's the executive telling a handful of his cabinets, "Hey...you all are going to work together to improve industrial efficiency."
That's really all it boils down to, giving the various departments some direction on something. If you want to see some nefarious plot in it, that's all up to you, you'll see whatever you want to see.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by Kharron
reply to post by 46ACE
This is great new OP... I'll give you a flag because this should be seen but no star as I really don't understand your tone with this -- are you trying to say lower carbon emissions and investing in cleaner energy is a bad thing?
It seems that this will force the companies who do not want to invest money into cleaning up their business to actually be motivated to do so. This is similar to the order where the president mandated American car companies start producing more fuel efficient cars by such and such year -- a good thing.
I look at the government as a tool of the people, it should be enacting and enforcing the rules and regulations that should benefit the people, the country and the world. I can't look as clean energy as anything else than a benefit to all three.
Khar
When I read posts like this I just say "God helps us" to myself...Sigh. Yeah that is why cars still on average only get 25-35 miles to the gallon The friggen model T got 35 miles to a gallon of gas... So zero progress in 100 year!... Lot of good those orders did...
The OP's point you completely missed is that the President has no authority to "force" private businesses to do anything. Also the government is the main enabler/protector for the energy cartels which is why we're still using 150 year old technology for transportation and burning oil. They stifle real energy progress they are lackeys for the oil cartels which is why our young people are dying in foreign countries to procure their resources ...
edit on 4-9-2012 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 46ACE
Then Don't you complain if Romney unilaterally closes abortion clinics; after all "It's what's best for us"...
I'm done here.
Somebody is getting "greased"; it's politics. .
g'day.edit on 4-9-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kharron
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by Kharron
reply to post by 46ACE
This is great new OP... I'll give you a flag because this should be seen but no star as I really don't understand your tone with this -- are you trying to say lower carbon emissions and investing in cleaner energy is a bad thing?
It seems that this will force the companies who do not want to invest money into cleaning up their business to actually be motivated to do so. This is similar to the order where the president mandated American car companies start producing more fuel efficient cars by such and such year -- a good thing.
I look at the government as a tool of the people, it should be enacting and enforcing the rules and regulations that should benefit the people, the country and the world. I can't look as clean energy as anything else than a benefit to all three.
Khar
When I read posts like this I just say "God helps us" to myself...Sigh. Yeah that is why cars still on average only get 25-35 miles to the gallon The friggen model T got 35 miles to a gallon of gas... So zero progress in 100 year!... Lot of good those orders did...
The OP's point you completely missed is that the President has no authority to "force" private businesses to do anything. Also the government is the main enabler/protector for the energy cartels which is why we're still using 150 year old technology for transportation and burning oil. They stifle real energy progress they are lackeys for the oil cartels which is why our young people are dying in foreign countries to procure their resources ...
edit on 4-9-2012 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)
Listen I know that you guys try to turn everything into a partisan debate but really, leave this one alone. You need to recognize that sometimes it may be a good thing for all of us.
And you don't think the government should tell private businesses what to do? You mean like the government can't tell private businesses not to discriminate based on race? Can't tell ERs to have to take every injured person, even though they'd rather not take them?
I don't like big government, but when it actually performs the function it's intended to perform, for the benefit of us all -- then it makes no difference who is in office.
But whatever, you'll say again that I, of course, don't see the big picture like you do... meh.
Kharedit on 4-9-2012 by Kharron because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by Kharron
It's all good so long as the King issuing decrees is issuing decrees you agree with? Okay, but I will remember this when the boot is on the other foot. You put in a vote in favor of the desecration of our constitution. Do not complain later.
Originally posted by 46ACE
Originally posted by MsAphrodite
reply to post by Kharron
It's all good so long as the King issuing decrees is issuing decrees you agree with? Okay, but I will remember this when the boot is on the other foot. You put in a vote in favor of the desecration of our constitution. Do not complain later.
Thankyou... Somebody gets it.