It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Secrets Revealed 2

page: 1
10
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 07:53 AM
link   
Description:
2,1,5,1,6,2,6,3,2,10,3,2,77,4,1,3,3,3,7,4,6,6,2,6,7,8,1,1,5,5,1,3,5,4,1,1

en.wikipedia.org...




Note: This is a conspiracy treasure hunt that is intended to be unravelled in a similar format to this thread - www.abovetopsecret.com... The secrets being revealed are not by me but by those that follow the clues!



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 08:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by II HAL II
Description:
2,1,5,1,6,2,6,3,2,10,3,2,

77

,4,1,3,3,3,7,4,6,6,2,6,7,8,1,1,5,5,1,3,5,4,1,1



Please tell me you missed a comma between those two 7's...
That stretch is killing me!







posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 08:28 AM
link   
reply to post by II HAL II
 


I got no clue what you mean, what are those numbers and where did you get them.



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 08:32 AM
link   
reply to post by havok
 


Hee hee... that is a 77.

If your on the correct lines you may be able to see why it had to be 77.

Trueman - I can't tell you that
... yet.
edit on 26-8-2012 by II HAL II because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 08:34 AM
link   
So.

I gathered that there is an Aztec weapon called the Macuahuitl.
There's supposedly one left in existance in a warehouse somewhere.
But that rash of numbers...now that's where I'm freaking out a bit.






posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 08:47 AM
link   
reply to post by II HAL II
 


Haha....well, at least I know now that you didn't put the wrong link on your initial post.

edit on 26-8-2012 by Trueman because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 09:14 AM
link   
I have to admit this one is a lot harder than the previous thread so... maybe it would help if I presented the numbers like this -

Description:
2,1, 5,1, 6,2, 6,3, 2,10, 3,2, 77,4, 1,3, 3,3, 7,4, 6,6, 2,6, 7,8, 1,1, 5,5, 1,3, 5,4, 1,1

en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 09:25 AM
link   
reply to post by II HAL II
 

nvm

edit on 26-8-2012 by zilebeliveunknown because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 10:06 AM
link   
reply to post by II HAL II
 


Binary and Morse has been ruled out.



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 10:18 AM
link   
reply to post by SarnholeOntarable
 


Lol that's great... and to quote "I think you know what the problem is, just as well as I do".

If this is of any help - the numbers need to be applied to the link provided.
edit on 26-8-2012 by II HAL II because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 10:59 AM
link   
reply to post by II HAL II
 


..I got it
...



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 11:07 AM
link   
reply to post by SarnholeOntarable
 


Cool... I'm hoping you do.

Please share and explain.



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 11:09 AM
link   
Perhaps the latest of forum games? Oh goodie!



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 11:09 AM
link   
Perhaps the latest of forum games? Oh goodie! double post -_-
edit on 26/8/12 by IntoxicatingMadness because: doubled.



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 01:14 PM
link   
Are those numbers 3 set of 9 numbers?



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 02:18 PM
link   
Yippeeee,

Thanks Hal!

Ok, now someone work on those numbers.

Eta, did the Aztecs have an alphabet?

It isn't a word count, I tried to apply it to the note numbers, and description numbers. Hmmm....my eyes keep getting drawn to the florentine codex, but I don't think that is it either.
edit on 26-8-2012 by Doodle19815 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 03:29 PM
link   
reply to post by SarnholeOntarable
 


There needs to be a few help for my decipher....Maybe I have it all backwards hal



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 03:44 PM
link   
reply to post by SarnholeOntarable
 


Throw out what you got and we can work on some ideas. I am stumped so far.



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 03:48 PM
link   
Ok big clue coming...

What if I said, for example 77,4 = K

Also look at the OP again to see what the numbers apply to, it's doesn't just point to a link but a place within the link.



posted on Aug, 26 2012 @ 03:49 PM
link   
reply to post by II HAL II
 


Ah ha, description! Totally overlooked that, thanks.

In the word lacks.....I am onto something. Grrrr...gotta fix supper. Will be back
edit on 26-8-2012 by Doodle19815 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
10
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join