It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpearMint
For it to be plausible that God made the universe, God has to be able to exist without time. This is probably dismissed commonly with "he can", but when you understand what time actually is it seems impossible.
Originally posted by SpearMint
For it to be plausible that God made the universe, God has to be able to exist without time. This is probably dismissed commonly with "he can", but when you understand what time actually is it seems impossible.
Originally posted by daaskapital
Originally posted by SpearMint
For it to be plausible that God made the universe, God has to be able to exist without time. This is probably dismissed commonly with "he can", but when you understand what time actually is it seems impossible.
"Time" as we understand it is just a human construction...
Originally posted by KingAtlas
reply to post by SpearMint
Also, I never stated that God had created the Universe, that is an assumption that you made.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by daaskapital
Originally posted by SpearMint
For it to be plausible that God made the universe, God has to be able to exist without time. This is probably dismissed commonly with "he can", but when you understand what time actually is it seems impossible.
"Time" as we understand it is just a human construction...
How can you say that without knowing for sure how time works? We observe and we learn, so no, it's not a human construction.
Originally posted by daaskapital
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by daaskapital
Originally posted by SpearMint
For it to be plausible that God made the universe, God has to be able to exist without time. This is probably dismissed commonly with "he can", but when you understand what time actually is it seems impossible.
"Time" as we understand it is just a human construction...
How can you say that without knowing for sure how time works? We observe and we learn, so no, it's not a human construction.
No one knows for sure what time is. Time is created purely on speculation and assumptions on behalf of the Human species.
It isn't really 1:14 AM where i am...as this specific "time" was created by humans. Prehistoric humans never used time as we do today, therefore, time as we know it now is a human construction.
Originally posted by KingAtlas
reply to post by daaskapital
I think the "time" he was referring to was the correlation between space and time, and that space-time does not exist outside a universe. (although I could be wrong)
It could be argued that the Universe is the expansion of space-time itself.
Although one must be careful of the thin grey line between correlation and causation.
edit on 24-8-2012 by KingAtlas because: forgot an quotation marke, and clarity
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by KingAtlas
reply to post by daaskapital
I think the "time" he was referring to was the correlation between space and time, and that space-time does not exist outside a universe. (although I could be wrong)
It could be argued that the Universe is the expansion of space-time itself.
Although one must be careful of the thin grey line between correlation and causation.
edit on 24-8-2012 by KingAtlas because: forgot an quotation marke, and clarity
Time does not exist, period. The reality is... We experience life as an assembly/ reassembly point - point (e.g. the displays on monitors/ flat screens set to various frame rates). We are a display of vectors while 'digging' streams of consciousness.
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by KingAtlas
reply to post by daaskapital
I think the "time" he was referring to was the correlation between space and time, and that space-time does not exist outside a universe. (although I could be wrong)
It could be argued that the Universe is the expansion of space-time itself.
Although one must be careful of the thin grey line between correlation and causation.
edit on 24-8-2012 by KingAtlas because: forgot an quotation marke, and clarity
Time does not exist, period. The reality is... We experience life as an assembly/ reassembly point - point (e.g. the displays on monitors/ flat screens set to various frame rates). We are a display of vectors while 'digging' streams of consciousness.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by Americanist
Originally posted by KingAtlas
reply to post by daaskapital
I think the "time" he was referring to was the correlation between space and time, and that space-time does not exist outside a universe. (although I could be wrong)
It could be argued that the Universe is the expansion of space-time itself.
Although one must be careful of the thin grey line between correlation and causation.
edit on 24-8-2012 by KingAtlas because: forgot an quotation marke, and clarity
Time does not exist, period. The reality is... We experience life as an assembly/ reassembly point - point (e.g. the displays on monitors/ flat screens set to various frame rates). We are a display of vectors while 'digging' streams of consciousness.
If that is true, then time is that "frame rate". Time exists no matter what it's definition is, we can clearly observe it, and we can observe time being slowed as the observer (a watch) increases in speed. We know time exists and we know it's relative.