posted on Aug, 18 2012 @ 11:43 AM
There are so many claims which have not been substantiated, and seemingly haven't even been investigated. Furthermore, the SIMPLEST investigation
method is needed to solve some of these questions.
For example:
Claim -- James Holmes was let into the theater by an accomplice.
Refutation -- James Holmes pretended to get a phone call and propped the door open, then returned.
SIMPLE investigation methods:
1 -- Look through Holmes' phone, or phone records.
2 -- IF he bought a ticket then his name is either in the self service kiosk because of his credit card, or his face is on the security camera when he
bought his ticket at the box office.
Claim -- There were 2 shooters, and 2 directions from which the tear gas was thrown.
Refutation -- Witnesses were in shock and couldn't remember - there was only 1 shooter
Refutation 2 -- There was only 1 shooter, and 1 tear gas bomb.
SIMPLE investigation methods:
1 -- How many canisters were found at the scene?
2 -- Were they finger printed?
3 -- Was basic forensic analysis done to find the direction from which they were thrown?
4 -- Did you look at the security camera???
I'm not actually saying that none of this was done, I'm saying that even if it was done it all seems to fall behind the veil of secrecy. Why is
there so much that is unknown still?