It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't see it happening any time soon. I tend to believe that the microchip or sign of the beast is going to be more of a secular thing. People simply won't do it so then what? Medical care will go underground. But then what happens when the banking industry requires it? I could see a lot more people accepting the microchip then but a black market based on trade would eventually develop for those that altogether refuse the microchip. What do you think will happen when March 23 rolls around and most people don't comply? I'm thinking that some kind of new pandemic could be created at which point the president is authorized to send foreign troops onto US soil to enforce vaccinations. The president can then confiscate food, water, and communications and only permit people with the microchip access. I'm not convinced that all of this will happen in March but it may happen sooner or later. What do you think would happen?
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.” link
Originally posted by micmerci
Personally, I do not think this is the mark of the beast. I think it is one of many precursors that will get people accustomed to the system by which the mark will be administered. Scripture states that people will willingly take the mark and will basically know what they are doing. It will not be administered under the guise of a helpful program or entitlement.
The Obama Health care bill under Class II (Paragraph 1, Section B) specifically includes ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable." Then on page 1004 it describes what the term "data" means in paragraph 1, section B:
14 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to in15
formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1),
16 including claims data, patient survey data, standardized
17 analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
18 data from disparate data environments, electronic health
19 records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the
20 Secretary" www.opencongress.org...
Originally posted by kluskinoodle
reply to post by chizeled
If you read the original quote carefully, it's referring to "medical devices". Medical devices encompass a multitude of things: hip replacements, knee replacements, pacemakers, etc. They are calling for a registry of medical devices in order to analyze the functionality after the device has been utilized. It's like a big database of what was used when so they can identify patterns in issues related to the products...so manufacturers, etc. know whom to notify in case the device has issues. Kind of like a recall notification.
The people on the video suggest that it is being implemented in remote regions...perhaps to keep it out of the news? I suppose that they could be experimenting on people in remote regions before taking it to the masses...
Originally posted by SrWingCommander
reply to post by chizeled
I know 3 people that just got back from working in the Phillipines, and they did not mention it (I would think they would if they had)....i'll try to ask them if they heard about it.
However, the wording is left vague so that it can be used to refer to just about anything that could be construed as a device. A microchip is a device that is used to plug into a "big database" of patient identification, insurance, and medical records "so they can identify patterns in issues related to" health.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by kluskinoodle
reply to post by chizeled
If you read the original quote carefully, it's referring to "medical devices". Medical devices encompass a multitude of things: hip replacements, knee replacements, pacemakers, etc. They are calling for a registry of medical devices in order to analyze the functionality after the device has been utilized. It's like a big database of what was used when so they can identify patterns in issues related to the products...so manufacturers, etc. know whom to notify in case the device has issues. Kind of like a recall notification.
Thanks for bringing some sense and rationality to this crazy thread.
Whether or not the microchip requirement in the bill is implemented by 2013, remains to be seen