It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jepic
Don't know where else to post this, so of course move it if there is a more appropiate forum.
Now we all know this gun control problem there seems to be and after some time thinking a great idea popped into my head.
What if we make the need of having a PHD a basic requirement for owning a weapon. Just to be clear I'm not saying anyone with a PHD should automatically be granted a gun. I mean it should just be a basic requirement to owning a gun and from there of course, further requirements would be to undergo a background check and then some mental tests. After if you are deemed safe, responsible, mature you get any gun you want.
So just to go into more detail here is my plan for the requirements a person would need to have a gun.
1. A PHD in any subject.
2. A wife/husband with at least an undergraduate degree.
3. A stable and happy social circle and social life.
4. At least one son/daughter.
There is my plan. Because if you think about it. Someone without a university education should not own a firearm. And if my plan was implemented neither would he have to own one because you can be certain he won't be massacred by a happy doctor or happy philospher for that reason.
With my plan only people with maturity, responsibility, and respect would have a firearm. You can be certain a shooting such as the Aurora massacre or any school shooting would be very rare.
So top psychologists & psychiatrists are good judges of character?
Originally posted by Jepic
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Originally posted by Jepic
reply to post by CaptChaos
I'm just gonna copy my new answer for everyone.
Okay I'm willing to make some improvements to my plan.
The requirements are now as follow:
1. A background check on your social stability, social circle, personal sanity, ideology and upbringing.
These tests are done regularly.
If you pass the set of tests ago for the first time you get to have a firearm of your choice. Sequent regular tests are done to determine if you can keep having your firearm.
Your new answer is even worse.
I will conduct all background checks, and I will decide who passes or not. Starting with YOU.
The Decider has spoken.
No, not you. A commitee of professionals. Among them top psychologists, psychiatrists, etc...edit on 23/7/12 by Jepic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jepic
reply to post by CynicalWabbit
Do people want peace? My "utopia" offers peace.
Do people want financial security? My "utopia" offers them financial security.
Do people want to be educated and full of knowledge? My "utopia" offers them education and knowledge.
Do people want to explore the stars? Hell! Of course! My "utopia" offers them exploration to the stars and beyond.
To refuse my way, is to refuse what mankind has strived for since the beginning of its conception.
To refuse my way, is to be happy with the problems of today.
Originally posted by Jepic
Don't know where else to post this, so of course move it if there is a more appropiate forum.
Now we all know this gun control problem there seems to be and after some time thinking a great idea popped into my head.
What if we make the need of having a PHD a basic requirement for owning a weapon. Just to be clear I'm not saying anyone with a PHD should automatically be granted a gun. I mean it should just be a basic requirement to owning a gun and from there of course, further requirements would be to undergo a background check and then some mental tests. After if you are deemed safe, responsible, mature you get any gun you want.
So just to go into more detail here is my plan for the requirements a person would need to have a gun.
1. A PHD in any subject.
2. A wife/husband with at least an undergraduate degree.
3. A stable and happy social circle and social life.
4. At least one son/daughter.
There is my plan. Because if you think about it. Someone without a university education should not own a firearm. And if my plan was implemented neither would he have to own one because you can be certain he won't be massacred by a happy doctor or happy philospher for that reason.
With my plan only people with maturity, responsibility, and respect would have a firearm. You can be certain a shooting such as the Aurora massacre or any school shooting would be very rare.edit on 23/7/12 by Jepic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by randomname
reply to post by chr0naut
you live by the sword, you die by the sword.
think about what that actually means.