Originally posted by FissionSurplus
Oh jeez! Sorry, I cannot feel sympathy for these men. They went with her voluntarily, the first three times or so was fine by them, then they found
they were too used-up to continue, and she kept demanding it. So why couldn't they just walk away at that point? Did she hold them at gun or knife
point? Did she hang on them like a monkey, making it hard to just exit the situation?
Seems to me that they were hounded for sex when they were all petered out (pun fully intended), and they tried to keep up, but couldn't. That's when
they started to whine. Yeah, she may have been pushy, but they could have knocked her out of the way and ran off (unless she was one of those big
German gals who could whip any guy's butt).
The difference between a male and a female rapist is obvious. If the rapist is male, it's gonna happen, whether the woman wants to or not. With a
female, if the male can't or doesn't want to, it won't happen.
I don't feel sorry for these "victims". Funny story, though, thanks for sharing it, OP!
I find your post pretty disgusting....
Lets change the story a little bit:
"Woman found laying on the side of the street crying. When asked what was wrong, she told the police officers how a man had held her in his apartment
and raped her 8 times over the course of 36 hours. She said it was awful, and was unable to walk as a result of being raped 8 times"
Now, if that story was posted, how would YOU feel, how would most women here on ATS feel, if I responded by saying:
"I don't feel bad for that woman "victim" at all. She shouldn't have taken the chance to go back to his apartment and sleep with him if she didn't
want to be raped 8 times, and held against her will for 36 hours. The "victim" just couldn't handle all the sex the man wanted and decided to whine
about it. Funny story, OP, I love to hear about women getting raped! Good times!"
That would be incredibly insensitive, cruel, and disgusting to post. But it's basically exactly what you did.
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
The difference between a male and a female rapist is obvious. If the rapist is male, it's gonna happen, whether the woman wants to or not. With a
female, if the male can't or doesn't want to, it won't happen.
That's total BS, for many reasons.
First of all, many men will achieve an erection due to physical stimulation, REGARDLESS of whether or not they are "into it"
Second, there are also many drugs you can give to a man that will cause him to hold an erection for long periods of time.
And lastly, there are rings that, once erection is achieved, can be placed around the base of the penis, that will contain the blood and maintain an
erection past the point of ejaculation.
The article doesn't go into much detail, but I find it hard to believe the men were free to go and only stayed to "be nice" They might have been
drugged, tied up, or anything number of things. We don't really know. But it's fairly obvious they WANTED to escape, they did NOT want to engage in
further sexual acts, and after she fell asleep they did escape. That's called rape, regardless of your sexist attitude on the manner.
There have also been stories of men being accused and convicted of rape, not because they physically overpowered and penetrated a woman, but because
they tricked a women into sex against her will, or blackmailed or manipulated her into having sex against her will. If you do NOT want to have sex,
and someone else makes you, by whatever means, that is RAPE and it's WRONG and ILLEGAL. Just because the victim (yes , victim, not "victim") is man
doesn't make it funny, it doesn't make it any less despicable. Shame on people who are so obvious biased to hate men that they refuse to see them as a
victim and perpetually paint males and nothing but aggressors and people that victimize others.
I'm so tired of the mentality women usually hold that it's impossible for men to be victims. So much for equality. It's shameful and disgusting.
edit on 14-6-2012 by James1982 because: (no reason given)