It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by b3l13v3
They are saying "The Chairman was removed".
Read these two articles...this convention was well aware of the trouble the Paul supporters were going to try to cause, so they amended the rules to prevent them from doing so.
www.nola.com...
www.nola.com...
From what I can tell, the Paul people probably tried to still vote out the sitting chairman...but with the new rules they needed two thirds vote to do so...which they didn't have.
From the video, I would guess the Paul supporters just tried to ignore the new rules and claim they voted out the chairman and put the guy being escorted out as the new chairman. The reason the original chairman is still talking is because he IS the official chairman.
Just more antics from the Paul people that are making Paul look bad...and he specifically asked his supporters not to do this kind of thing.
Originally posted by N3k9Ni
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Rules were set up specifically to disenfranchise Ron Paul supporters? Is that legal?
I'm not sure exactly what happened there, but it sounds pretty underhanded.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by N3k9Ni
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Rules were set up specifically to disenfranchise Ron Paul supporters? Is that legal?
I'm not sure exactly what happened there, but it sounds pretty underhanded.
The GOP is a private organization...they can make any rules they want to.
I worked the Caucses down here. And I have more to add to this. This is the same strategy used in Louisiana every year. Whomever controls the caucuses, in this state, lords it over the primaries--it's been that way for a long time. To be in a slate, to be voted for, you just have to meet the standards for that slate. So, a lot of Ron Paul delegates were on slates that would be for Mitt Romney or Santorum. These laws, enacted, were to stop what has always been the process down here. So, it could go to court. But we're just watching, for now.
The Santorum and Romney campaigns asked that its choices for delegates be honored, and late this week, the state party's executive committee issued supplemental rules for the convention to ensure that the Santorum and Romney delegates were the genuine article.
"The Ron Paul people evidently are offended by this," said Jeff Giles, a party activist from Houma who chairs the Credentials Committee. "They want to select their people to go to Tampa masquerading as Romney delegates or Santorum delegates. We have ascertained reading their blogs around the country -- this is no big secret -- that they call it `stealing delegates.' They want to steal the delegates of Romney and Santorum."[/quote]
Your source doesn't paint the picture you were wishing to paint. There's a huge problem with 1 man favoring ANY delegate at all having so much control. And no, he's not a Ron Paul supporter.
Wrong, said Charlie Davis, field marshal for the Paul forces. "We are going to select delegates who will vote for whoever they were bound to vote for," and "we'll probably see a lot of the same people," as the Romney and Santorum campaigns requested.
But, said Davis, the 16 pages of new rules "were so overdone it is hard to read them with a straight face." For example, Villere was made permanent chair of the convention, it would take a three quarters vote of the convention to overrule him, and only a third of the delegates constituted a quorum, apparently to enable it to work its will even if the Paul forces walk out. The rules also tightly scripted events down to the minute, guaranteeing the convention would end by 2 p.m.
Originally posted by N3k9Ni
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by N3k9Ni
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Rules were set up specifically to disenfranchise Ron Paul supporters? Is that legal?
I'm not sure exactly what happened there, but it sounds pretty underhanded.
The GOP is a private organization...they can make any rules they want to.
No. They cannot make rules that allow them to commit election fraud.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by N3k9Ni
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by N3k9Ni
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Rules were set up specifically to disenfranchise Ron Paul supporters? Is that legal?
I'm not sure exactly what happened there, but it sounds pretty underhanded.
The GOP is a private organization...they can make any rules they want to.
No. They cannot make rules that allow them to commit election fraud.
These aren't government election...they are meetings of a private organization.
The GOP could cancel the primary process right now and just appoint anyone they want as the GOP presidential candidate if they wanted to.edit on 2-6-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)