It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
answers.com
www.answers.com...
At least 85 people died during the purge, although the final death toll may have been in the hundreds,[2][3] and more than a thousand perceived opponents were arrested.
Read more: www.answers.com...
Originally posted by korathin
Who else is building a large 100,000+ strong army that they have weak "control" over?
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by korathin
Who else is building a large 100,000+ strong army that they have weak "control" over?
I dunno , the Pope? Oprah?...lol who?edit on 12-4-2012 by EyesWideShut because: (no reason given)
Blomberg and von Reichenau began to conspire with Hermann Göring and Heinrich Himmler against Röhm and the SA. Himmler asked Reinhard Heydrich to assemble a dossier on Röhm. Heydrich recognized that in order for the SS to fully gain national power the SA had to be broken.[12] He manufactured evidence that suggested that Röhm had been paid 12 million marks by the French to overthrow Hitler. Hitler liked Ernst Röhm and initially refused to believe the dossier provided by Heydrich. Röhm had been one of his first supporters and, without his ability to obtain army funds in the early days of the movement, it is unlikely that the Nazis would have ever become established. The SA under Röhm's leadership had also played a vital role in destroying the opposition during the elections of 1932 and 1933. However, Adolf Hitler had his own reasons for wanting Röhm removed. Powerful supporters of Hitler had been complaining about Röhm for some time. The generals were fearful of Röhm's desire to have the SA, a force of over 3 million men, absorb the much smaller German Army into its ranks under his leadership.[12] Further, reports of a huge cache of weapons in the hands of SA members gave the army commanders even more concern.[12] Industrialists, who had provided the funds for the Nazi victory, were unhappy with Röhm's socialistic views on the economy and his claims that the real revolution had still to take place. Matters came to a head in June 1934 when President von Hindenburg, who had the complete loyalty of the Army, informed Hitler that if he did not move to curb the SA then Hindenburg would dissolve the Government and declare martial law
Originally posted by korathin
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by korathin
Who else is building a large 100,000+ strong army that they have weak "control" over?
I dunno , the Pope? Oprah?...lol who?edit on 12-4-2012 by EyesWideShut because: (no reason given)
I could play a guessing game..... But yeah that wouldn't amuse me.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by korathin
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by korathin
Who else is building a large 100,000+ strong army that they have weak "control" over?
I dunno , the Pope? Oprah?...lol who?edit on 12-4-2012 by EyesWideShut because: (no reason given)
I could play a guessing game..... But yeah that wouldn't amuse me.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Ok, well tell me then... don't link me to another members thread. I'm trying to find the correlation between the SA (Which Hitler himself disbanded and killed the leaders) and OWS, can you expand on this? Break it down Barney style, I'm Dense.
Originally posted by korathin
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by korathin
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by korathin
Who else is building a large 100,000+ strong army that they have weak "control" over?
I dunno , the Pope? Oprah?...lol who?edit on 12-4-2012 by EyesWideShut because: (no reason given)
I could play a guessing game..... But yeah that wouldn't amuse me.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Ok, well tell me then... don't link me to another members thread. I'm trying to find the correlation between the SA (Which Hitler himself disbanded and killed the leaders) and OWS, can you expand on this? Break it down Barney style, I'm Dense.
Maybe I was a Gnostic in a past life, but if you can't figure it out maybe your not meant to know?
This thread is mostly a product of my irritation over people misusing the noun "Brownshirts"(when they should be thinking of Mussolini's Black Shirts), and how Hitler used the threat of his own paramilitary force to increase his own power. An act that enabled him to stage the Reichstag fires and become dictator.
Truth is the SA(Brownshirt's) may have been battle hardened Vet's. Back then EVERYONE was battle hardened compared to most civilians today. We are soft and often squishy these day's. Doesn't take much to scare people anymore. All the technology around us has made us grown soft and weak. So an inferior force(inferior to the SA) would still have the same effect as a well organized paramilitary filled with battle hardened vets.
P.S
Hitler never disbanded the SA, they were just kept around(the few remaining members) for ceremonial purposes.edit on 12-4-2012 by korathin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
reply to post by korathin
See , you had the balls to say it "Obama" Obama is in no way shape or form for "OWS". Don't pay attention to what people say, pay attention to their actions. Obama voted for the troubled asset relief program , he supported Jon Corzine in his MF Global Debacle , He brokered the pro bank mortgage fraud setlement 2 months ago, He raised more money in his campaign account from wall street through the DNC than any nominee in American History. You can listen to the GOP rhetoric , or you can look at the facts. At the end of the day everyone in washington is pro Wall St.
That is why this Obama/Hitler Brownshirt/OWS comparison is absurd.
Originally posted by sonnny1
"We cannot to continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we have set. We have got to have a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." Barack Obama
S&Fedit on 12-4-2012 by sonnny1 because: (no reason given)
Recent Gallup poll data on the public’s opinion regarding gun control shows a change in the sentiment of Americans and gun ownership continues to rise. A higher percentage of Americans who own guns lean Republican (55 percent of Republicans surveyed own guns), but the number of residents owning guns that lean Democrat have made huge leaps in the last two years, from 30 percent to 40 percent. True to form, southerners (54 percent) and residents in the Midwest (51 percent) are more likely to own guns than those in the East (36 percent) or West (43 percent). A recent article in guns.com reports that about 34 percent of Americans own guns. Most of them are men, as about 46 percent of men say they own guns as opposed to 23 percent of women. Adults age 35 to 54 without a college education are also more likely to own a gun that any other demographic.