It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
In its April cover story, Wired has an exclusive report on the NSA's Utah Data Center, which is a must read for anyone who believes any privacy is still a possibility in the United States: "A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks....
Originally posted by johncarter
.....
It is sad. If this nation is to be destroyed from within like the last days of rome then may it be so. If any, we truly have reached a point where the stench of our actions (yes even us ordianry shmoes voting forth these bastards) have made the world hate us like no other nation in the history of man. We have become worse then the Nazis.
Originally posted by Schkeptick
Originally posted by johncarter
.....
It is sad. If this nation is to be destroyed from within like the last days of rome then may it be so. If any, we truly have reached a point where the stench of our actions (yes even us ordianry shmoes voting forth these bastards) have made the world hate us like no other nation in the history of man. We have become worse then the Nazis.
This was an interesting post. Then you lost me with this gem. If you think we are currently worse than the Nazis, you need to review your world history.
But then again, as soon as anyone mentions "Nazis" as a comparison, I roll my eyes and click away. It's becoming cliche.
Reductio ad Hitlerum, also argumentum ad Hitlerum, (Latin for "reduction to" and "argument to" and dog Latin for "Hitler" respectively) is an ad hominem or ad misericordiam argument whereby an opponent's view is compared to a view that would be held by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party.
It is a fallacy of irrelevance, in which a conclusion is suggested based solely on something's or someone's origin rather than its current meaning. The suggested logic is one of guilt by association.
Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies) is a humorous observation made by Mike Godwin in 1990 that has become an Internet adage.
It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."
In other words, Godwin observed that, given enough time, in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably criticizes some point made in the discussion by comparing it to beliefs held by Hitler and the Nazis.
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Don't shoot me, but I actually embrace a totalitarian, NWO state.
And actually, its about time.
Look at it this way, the inclusion of a Nazi comparison is an efficient barometer to identify either a lack of historical perspective or a desire to provoke a reaction through insult.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by johncarter
I am starting to think that it is more mocking contempt, rather than distrust. Like waving it in our faces and laughing because we continue take it.
Originally posted by Bakatono
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Don't shoot me, but I actually embrace a totalitarian, NWO state.
And actually, its about time.
So, I am going to assume you are being sincere and aren't just a troll.
I think your statement, if genuine, is interesting. Can you elaborate on your statement? Why would you welcome a totalitarian NWO state? Why do you think it is overdue? What are the benefits of it vs. existing governments (not just the US, but any government)?