It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ron Paul supporters came to this caucus despite the fact that they weren't supposed to unless it was for religous reasons. And Ron Paul did win this "special late night" caucus....no one disputes that. He did not win Clark County...and this one caucus site only represented 1.9% of the votes cast in Clark County. He could have won 100% of the 317 votes cast at that caucus site and he still would of lost horribly in Clark County.
You can't take ONE precinct's results and apply it to the entire state....what don't you understand about this?
Originally posted by rstregooski
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
You can't take ONE precinct's results and apply it to the entire state....what don't you understand about this?
It's the only one I've seen so far ON VIDEO.. A publicized vote-counting. That's the whole point to this...edit on 6-2-2012 by rstregooski because: beeredit on 6-2-2012 by rstregooski because: too much beer..
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by rstregooski
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
You can't take ONE precinct's results and apply it to the entire state....what don't you understand about this?
It's the only one I've seen so far ON VIDEO.. A publicized vote-counting. That's the whole point to this...edit on 6-2-2012 by rstregooski because: beeredit on 6-2-2012 by rstregooski because: too much beer..
Do you don't trust Ron Paul and his campaign staff saying that the counts are legit???
That seems kind of odd...Paul isn't crying fraud...do you believe he is in on it?
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by rstregooski
What are you talking about?
First you were upset by the video, calling it "proof". Then when it's clear it's not "proof" you say that it's actually some sort of call to arms, that the "whole" point of your thread, not included in the OP mind, was that all caucus counting should be public. T prevent a conspiracy you have no evidence is actually happening.
This is such a ridiculous thread.
Present evidence of a problem, then wordy about it's solution. There's no evidence anything happened to Ron Paul votes. None.edit on 6-2-2012 by captainnotsoobvious because: (no reason given)
T prevent a conspiracy you have no evidence is actually happening
That seems kind of odd...Paul isn't crying fraud...do you believe he is in on it?
Originally posted by rstregooski
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
That seems kind of odd...Paul isn't crying fraud...do you believe he is in on it?
Logical and critical thinking should tell you that for him to publicly denounce this would be political suicide... Just think of what the media would do with him saying something like the vote-count was tainted..
Originally posted by juveous
So what exactly happened here? Ron Paul won the county that had a larger population than the rest of the counties combined, and still lost?edit on 6-2-2012 by juveous because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by juveous
oh, because from the OP it had looked like he won the entire county. Hmm, would still be interesting if all votes came in live though
Have any more excuses?
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by juveous
oh, because from the OP it had looked like he won the entire county. Hmm, would still be interesting if all votes came in live though
Yes...that is the misinformation the OP is trying to spread. He has said it multiple times despite being told he is wrong.