It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I've been hearing about and seeing a lot of 1099 abuse these days. By that, I mean employers hiring more on 1099 than w-2, when they really should be hiring on w-2.
Originally posted by TXTriker
You are correct in that there is a lot more 1099 vs W2. I'm not so sure that its abuse though. A lot of small employers simply cannot hire people on a W2 basis. The taxes, the SS, unemployment taxes and the cost of the paperwork would make it unaffordable for a lot of small business to hire help. I know because I am one of those small business owners. I only have one person working with me but it is on a 1099 basis. If I had to do it on a W2 basis then I wouldn't have an extra person and I would be working a much rougher schedule myself and couldn't grow my business. So, I can help employ one person on a 1099 or leave that person unemployed.
If it is a large company that already has employees then I would be more supicious of abuse. The 1099 allows them to not provide benefits and avoid the taxes.
The construction industry is heavily contracted and gaining employment is a rarity, but being an independent contractor is much more prevalent.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by ownbestenemy
The construction industry is heavily contracted and gaining employment is a rarity, but being an independent contractor is much more prevalent.
In which case it would be required that the contractor have a contractor's license, would it not? Carry their own liability and worker's comp insurance?
edit on 2/4/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)