It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by NeoVain
While we may not be certain about its name, function or composition, it could surely at least be termed an unexplained aerial phenomenon. By unexplained I mean explained satisfactorily.
It seems to have become progressively worse in the last few years. A ramping-up effect almost.
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
A rocket?? What has that got to do with contrails??
Originally posted by FissionSurplus
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
A rocket?? What has that got to do with contrails??
The Patent states "ROCKET HAVING BARIUM RELEASE SYSTEM TO CREATE ION CLOUDS IN THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE United States Patent: - US3813875 / Issued/Filed Dates: June 4, 1974 / April 28, 1972 "
Creating ion clouds in the upper atmosphere with barium using a rocket. The point being that they are putting barium in the upper atmosphere, and what goes up must come down.
I'm sure they have been able to use this technology for jet aircraft as well as rockets.
What rocket do you know that goes up in the atmosphere these days and then comes right back down without reaching outer space? The patent was for 1972.
Please note the following patents: " Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids United States Patent / 4,412,654 Yates / November 1, 1983" and "Liquid atomizing apparatus for aerial spraying United States Patent / 4,948,050 / Picot"
Aerial spraying. Aerial, as in AIR. Spraying, as in SPRAY. They're not spraying this crap in space, but in our atmosphere.
Sorry if you don't understand this, and I am sorry for you that all your posts try to debunk chemtrails, because you and your family have to breathe it too.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
I don't know if you guys are deliberately missing the point (I strongly suspect so but that aside), the difference between a chemtrail and a contrail for us "believers" is that one is hanging around for hours forming grid, box or X patterns, when another is gone within a matter of minutes or sometimes even seconds and that is not due to weather, height or speed as the mixed "phenomena" have been observed on the same day, with the same type of planes flying at the same (apparent) height and speed. Hope it clarifies.
16We estimate a total cost of lifting mass into the stratosphere on wide-body commercial aircraft to be
~$0.3/pound, whereas the current cost of putting a pound-mass of payload into low Earth orbit by– 6–
microscopic scattering particles of anthropogenic
17
and natural
18
origins is comparable to the halfdecade residence time of its molecular components,
19
so that appropriately fine-scale particulate
loadings of the middle stratosphere will persist for five-year intervals. However, the stratosphere
is a chemically uncongenial location due to the high flux of ultraviolet radiation from the Sun and
the presence of oxygen, particularly in the more reactive form of ozone
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Why would multiple versions of the same event exist in identical conditions if it really was the same event? Con, chem and none.
As for clouds that's not a good comparison, clouds are naturally formed.
Originally posted by LightSpeedDriver
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Multiple versions of the same event, ie contrail, chemtrail and little or no trail all visible in the same sky, on the same day with the same conditions.
And...because I doubt that clouds are formed naturally as a result of aircraft exhaust.